A rare case of combined immunodeficiency with cytopenia whose symptoms were controlled by cyclosporine.

Combined Immunodeficiency (CID) is a group of inborn error of Immunity (IEI) that may present with both infectious and non-infectious complications. Autoimmunity is an unusual presentation of CID and can be presented as cytopenia. The initial management of cytopenia is corticosteroids and IVIG. The role of other cytotoxic and immunosuppressive drugs in management of cytopenia is not fully understood. The objective of this clinical case report is to highlight the possibly beneficial role of cyclosporine in controlling cytopenia in CID patients. A 26-month-old child with generalized ecchymosis was referred to Mofid Children's Hospital in Tehran, Iran. Physical examination revealed no substantial findings other than ecchymosis, and complete blood count (CBC) revealed thrombocytopenia. Diagnosis of CID and cytopenia followed. The patient was treated by 5 times prednisolone and 4 times Rituximab. Finally, his ecchymosis was controlled by Cellcept, which was then tempered and substituted by cyclosporine.

The Place of Fluvoxamine in the Treatment of Non-critically ill Patients with COVID-19: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BackgroundFluvoxamine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is known to be used as antidepressant. Repurposing of Fluvoxamine for the treatment of COVID-19 is theorized to help in the prevention of the clinical deterioration of SARS CoV-2 patients. In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to assess the safety and efficacy of the drug under study in terms of its effect on the mortality and the risk of hospitalization and mechanical ventilation in non-critically ill COVID-19 patients. MethodsWe performed a systematic search of seven electronic databases. The search results were screened based on the previously determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We determined the data related to our objectives. The mortality rates, rates of hospitalization, risk of mechanical ventilation and serious side effects were extracted from the studies that successfully met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, the extracted data from the included studies was included in the meta-analysis. ResultsThree studies, two randomized clinical trials and one observational cohort study, with 1762 patients, were the final outcome of our search and screening processes. Among all participants, 886 patients received Fluvoxamine while 876 were controls. Follow up periods ranged from 7 days to 28 days. There was no significant difference in the intention-to-treat mortality rates between the two groups (RR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.36 - 1.21, p-value = 0.18; I2 = 0%). However, Fluvoxamine decreased the per-protocol mortality compared to both placebo alone or placebo/standard care (RR = 0.09; 95% CI: 0.01 - 0.64, p-value = 0.02; I2 = 0% and RR = 0.09; 95% CI: 0.01 - 0.72, respectively). As compared to placebo or standard care, the all-cause hospitalization was significantly reduced in the fluvoxamine group (RR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.54 - 0.93, p-value = 0.01; I2 = 61%). This risk reduction was not significant when compared to placebo alone (RR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.57 - 1.00; p-value = 0.051; I2 = 48%). Furthermore, the risk of mechanical ventilation was not improved in the fluvoxamine group as compared to placebo (RR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.43 - 1.16, p-value = 0.17; I2 = 0%). The serious adverse effects were almost the same in the treatment group and the control (13% and 12% respectively). ConclusionFluvoxamine does not significantly reduce the mortality rates or the risk of mechanical ventilation in SARS CoV-2 patients. Nonetheless, it was found to have a good impact on reducing all cause hospitalization among patients with COVID-19 disease. Therefore, further clinical studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of the drug and its mechanisms of action.