Effectiveness of a virtual reality trainer for retention of tourniquet application skills for hemorrhage control among emergency medicine residents.

Background: With a rise in mass casualty incidents, training in hemorrhage control using tourniquets has been championed as a basic-and lifesaving-procedure for bystanders and medical professionals alike. The current standard for training is in-person (IP) courses, which can be limited based on instructor availability. Virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated the potential to improve the accuracy of certain medical tasks but has not yet been developed for hemorrhage control. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a VR hemorrhage trainer in learner retention of tourniquet application when compared to traditional IP instructor teaching among a cohort of emergency medicine residents practicing in a Level I trauma center. Methods: This was a prospective, observational study of 53 emergency medicine residents at an inner-city program. Participants were randomly assigned to either the control or the VR group. On Day 0, all residents underwent a training session (IP vs. VR) for the proper, stepwise application of a tourniquet, as defined by the American College of Trauma Surgeons. Each participant was then assessed on the application of a tourniquet by a blinded instructor using the National Registry Hemorrhage Control Skills Lab rubric. After 3 months, each resident was reevaluated on the same rubric, with subsequent data analysis on successful tourniquet placement (measured as under 90 s) and time to completion. Results: Of the 53 participants, the IP training group had an initial pass rate of 97% (28/29) compared to 92% (22/24) in the VR group (p = 0.58). On retention testing, the IP training group had a pass rate of 95% (20/21) compared to 90% (18/20) in the VR group (p = 0.62). Stratifying the success of tourniquet placement by level of resident training did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences. Conclusions: In this pilot study of emergency medicine residents, we found no significant differences in successful hemorrhage control by tourniquet placement between those trained with VR compared to a traditional IP course among emergency medicine residents. While more studies with greater power are needed, the results suggest that VR may be a useful adjunct to traditional IP medical training.

Stress Testing the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Novel Use of In Situ Simulation to Identify and Mitigate Latent Safety Threats During Acute Airway Management.

INTRODUCTION: Although uncommon, cardiac arrests in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) are often catastrophic and likely to increase with rising case complexity. In situ simulation (ISS) has been used to identify latent safety threats (LSTs) in inpatient units but has not yet been studied in the CCL. METHODS: Three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles leveraging ISS were conducted focused on acute airway management. Data collected through debriefs focused on (1) airway management, (2) equipment availability, and (3) interdepartmental communication. The LSTs were subcategorized and plotted on the Survey Analysis for Evaluating Risk (SAFER)-Matrix. A SAFER score was calculated based on quantifying the likelihood of harm, scope, and the number of times a threat was identified during simulation. Time to definitive airway was collected as a secondary measure. Interventions were developed using cause and effect and driver diagrams between PDSA cycles. RESULTS: Eleven total simulations through 3 PDSA cycles were conducted between January and December 2021 (5 in PDSA 1, 4 in PDSA 2, and 2 in PDSA 3). One hundred one LSTs were identified with 14 total subcategories. The mean SAFER score decreased from 5.37 in PDSA 1, to 2.96 in PDSA 2, and to 1.00 in PDSA 3. Bivariate regression analysis showed a decrease in SAFER score of 2.19 for every PDSA cycle ( P = 0.011). Ordinary least squares regression had a decrease of 1.65 in airway-related threats every PDSA cycle ( P < 0.01) as well as an increase in intubation time of 35.0 seconds for every 1-unit increase in communication threat identified ( P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully leveraged ISS and existing quality improvement initiatives in the CCL, resulting in a decrease in airway-related threats as measured through simulation.

Telehealth Pharmacist Approach to Comprehensive Medication Management in Post-Discharge High-Risk Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Introduction: Clinical Pharmacist-led Comprehensive Medication Management (CMM) has the potential to mitigate medication errors during transitions in care, but current evidence is underdeveloped. The objective of this work was to assess the impact of optimized CMM services through a telehealth pharmacist clinic on hospital readmission and Emergency Department (ED) utilization rates. Methods: A quality improvement study with patients discharged home from an urban, nonacademic Hospital in Westchester County, New York, receiving telehealth CMM was used. Participants included adult patients discharged home from an internal medicine unit considered high risk for preventable adverse medication errors based on comorbidities and prescribed medications. Eligible patients were offered to enroll in telehealth CMM visits with a clinical pharmacist immediately, 30 days, and 60 days post-discharge versus the current standard of care. Results: Primary outcomes included the impact on 30- and 90-day readmission and ED visit rates. Secondary outcomes included quantifying the outcomes on patient engagement, enrollment, and volume resulting from the program's process improvements. In this study, 3,060 patients were discharged from June 14, 2021, to May 10, 2022; 1,547 were eligible and offered CMM visits, and 889 completed enrollment (Treated). There was a 2.1% absolute difference in 30-day readmission rates between untreated and attempted (p = 0.07), and a 2.9% difference between the untreated and treated group (p = 0.04). Thirty-day ED utilization decreased by 1.6% between untreated and attempted (p = 0.3), and 3.5% between the untreated and treated (p = 0.03). There were four Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles in this program, in which the process improvements resulted in an overall average increase in patient volume, enrollment rates, and patient engagement for this QI initiative. Conclusions: This study yielded significant reductions in readmission and ED utilization rates among treated patients, highlighting successful process improvements that improved patient engagement and the potential for enhancing care coordination in vulnerable populations.

Telehealth-based transitional care management programme to improve access to care.

BACKGROUND: The transition from hospital to home is a vulnerable time for patients and families that can be improved through care coordination and structured discharge planning. LOCAL PROBLEM: Our organisation aimed to develop and expand a programme that could improve 30-day readmission rates on overall and disease-specific populations by assessing the impact of a telehealth outreach by a registered nurse (RN) after discharge from an acute care setting on 30-day hospital readmission. METHODS: This is a prospective observational design conducted from May 2021 to December 2022 with an urban, non-academic, acute care hospital in Westchester County, New York. Outcomes for patients discharged home following inpatient hospitalisation were analysed within this study. We analysed overall and disease-specific populations (congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pneumonia (PNA)) as compared with a 40-month prestudy cohort. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were identified in a non-random fashion meeting criterion of being discharged home after an inpatient admission. Participants received a telephonic outreach by an RN within 72 hours of discharge. Contacted patients were asked questions addressing discharge instructions, medication access, follow-up appointments and social needs. Patients were offered services and resources based on their individual needs in response to the survey. RESULTS: 68.2% of the 24 808 patients were contacted to assess and offer services. Median readmission rates for these patients were 1.2% less than the prestudy cohort (11.0% to 9.8%). Decreases were also noted for disease-specific conditions (CHF (14.3% to 9.1%), COPD (20.0% to 13.4%) and PNA (14.9% to 14.0%)). Among those in the study period, those that were contacted between 24 and 48 hours after discharge were 1.2 times less likely to be readmitted than if unable to be contacted (254/3742 (6.8%) vs 647/7866 (8.2%); p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Using a multifaceted telehealth approach to improve patient engagement and access reduced 30-day hospital readmission for patients discharged from the acute care setting.

The Impact of a Narrative Medicine Life Story Pilot Program on Press Ganey™ Scores in an Outpatient Cancer Center.

Oncology patients face challenges beyond those directly affecting their cancer management. Guided personal narrative programs have been shown to help patients with chronic conditions and life-framing events. Few such narrative programs have been reported for cancer patients or analyzed for their impact on patient experience. We established our Life Story Narrative Program, modeled on the United States Veterans Affairs' "My Life, My Story" for outpatient oncology patients in our hospital's cancer center. Press Ganey™ patient experience scores from program participants were compared retrospectively with scores from patients who were not participants. Over an eight-month period, we invited 30 cancer center outpatients to participate. Twenty-seven individuals accepted, and 18 had their stories edited, approved, and scanned into their electronic health record. Cohort matching yielded a control arm consisting of 255 responses from 48 surveys, while the intervention arm consisted of 68 responses from 12 surveys. 78.4% of responses from the control arm were rated 5 compared with 100% in the intervention arm. The mean Press Ganey™ score response in the control arm was 4.71 compared with 5.00 from the intervention arm. Wilcoxon U value was 10,540 with p < .001. An outpatient narrative medicine program for cancer patients to tell their life stories can easily be organized. Patients were willing to participate, enrollment was brisk, and the use of resources was limited. Although our sample size was small, participation in our Life Story Narrative Pilot Program resulted in a statistically significant improvement in Press Ganey™ scores.

Use of Cognitive Aids to Augment Point of Care Hemorrhage Control Skills in Laypersons.

OBJECTIVE: The Stop the Bleed course aims to improve bystander hemorrhage control skills and may be improved with point-of-care aids. We sought to create and examine a variety of cognitive aids to identify an optimal method to augment bystander hemorrhage control skills in an emergency scenario. METHODS: Randomized trial of 346 college students. Effects of a visual or visual-audio aid on hemorrhage control skills were assessed through randomization into groups with and without prior training or familiarization with aids compared with controls. Tourniquet placement, wound packing skills, and participant comfortability were assessed during a simulated active shooter scenario. RESULTS: A total of 325 (94%) participants were included in the final analyses. Participants who had attended training (odds ratio [OR], 12.67; P = 9.3 × 10-11), were provided a visual-audio aid (OR, 1.96; P = 0.04), and were primed on their aid (OR, 2.23; P = 0.01) were superior in tourniquet placement with less errors (P < 0.05). Using an aid did not improve wound packing scores compared with bleeding control training alone (P > 0.05). Aid use improved comfortability and likelihood to intervene emergency hemorrhage scenarios (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using cognitive aids can improve bystander hemorrhage control skills with the strongest effects if they were previously trained and used an aid which combined visual and audio feedback that they were previously introduced to during the course training.

In Situ Simulation as a Quality Improvement Tool to Identify and Mitigate Latent Safety Threats for Emergency Department SARS-CoV-2 Airway Management: A Multi-Institutional Initiative.

BACKGROUND: In situ simulation has emerged as a powerful quality improvement (QI) tool in the identification of latent safety threats (LSTs). Following the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 at an urban epicenter of the disease, a multi-institutional collaborative was formed to integrate an in situ simulation protocol across five emergency departments (EDs) for systems improvement of acute airway management. METHODS: A prospective, multi-institutional QI initiative using two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles was implemented across five EDs. Each institution conducted simulations involving mannequins in acute respiratory failure requiring definitive airways. Simulations and systems-based debriefs were standardized. LSTs were collected in an online database, focused on (1) equipment availability, (2) infection control, and (3) communication. RESULTS: From June 2020 through May 2021, 58 of 70 (82.9%) planned simulations were completed across five sites with 328 unique individual participants. Overall LSTs per simulation (7.00-4.69, p < 0.001) and equipment LSTs (3.00-1.46, p < 0.001) decreased from cycle 1 to cycle 2. Changes in mean LSTs for infection control and communication categories varied among sites. There was no correlation between total LSTs or any of the categories and team size. Number of beds occupied was significantly negatively correlated with total and infection control LSTs. CONCLUSION: This study was unique in simultaneously running a structured in situ protocol across numerous diverse institutions during a global pandemic. This initiative found similar categories of threats across sites, and the protocol developed empowered participants to implement changes to mitigate identified threats.

The Impact of the Addition of a Virtual Reality Trainer on Skill Retention of Tourniquet Application for Hemorrhage Control Among Emergency Medical Technician Students: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma is a leading cause of preventable death in the United States. Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) often arrive first at the scene of traumatic injuries to perform life-saving skills such as tourniquet placement. While current EMT courses teach and test tourniquet application, studies have shown efficacy and retention of EMT skills such as tourniquet placement decay over time, with educational interventions needed to improve retention of skills. METHODS: A prospective randomized pilot study was conducted to determine differences in retention of tourniquet placement among 40 EMT students after initial training. Participants were randomly assigned to either a virtual reality (VR) intervention or a control group. The VR group received instruction from a refresher VR program 35 days after initial training as a supplement to their EMT course. Both the VR and control participants' tourniquet skills were assessed 70 days after initial training by blinded instructors.  Results: There was no significant difference in correct tourniquet placement between both groups (Control, 63% vs Intervention, 57%, p = 0.57). It was found that 9/21 participants (43%) in the VR intervention group failed to correctly apply the tourniquet while 7/19 of the control participants (37%) failed in tourniquet application. Additionally, the VR group was more likely to fail the tourniquet application due to improper tightening than the control group during the final assessment (p = 0.04).  Conclusion: In this pilot study, using a VR headset in conjunction with in-person training did not improve the efficacy and retention of tourniquet placement skills. Participants who received the VR intervention were more likely to have errors relating to haptics, rather than procedure-related errors.

In Situ Simulation as a Tool to Longitudinally Identify and Track Latent Safety Threats in a Structured Quality Improvement Initiative for SARS-CoV-2 Airway Management: A Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: In situ simulation has emerged as a powerful tool for identifying latent safety threats (LSTs). After the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, an urban community emergency department (ED) identified opportunities for improvement surrounding acute airway management and particularly focused on infection control precautions, equipment availability, and interprofessional communication during acute resuscitation. Using the Model for Improvement, a hybrid in situ/quality improvement initiative was implemented using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to enhance systems for intubating patients with SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Three PDSA cycles consisting of 10 simulations each were conducted from June 2020 through February 2021. Latent safety threats (LST) were identified through an in situ simulation scenario involving a patient with SARS-CoV-2 in acute respiratory failure. LSTs were collected through structured debriefs focused on (1) infection control, (2) equipment availability, and (3) communication. The SAFER-Matrix was used to score LSTs according to frequency and likelihood of harm by members of the ED QI team (SAFER score). The research team worked with the same QI leaders to implement action plans based on scored threats using cause-and-effect and driver diagrams. The Donabedian model was used to conceptually evaluate the quality of interventions upon conclusion of the third PDSA cycle. RESULTS: The median SAFER score decreased from 10.94 in PDSA cycle 1 to 6.77 in PDSA cycle 2 to 4.71 in PDSA cycle 3. Across all identified LSTs, the SAFER score decreased by 3.114 for every additional PDSA cycle ( P = 0.0167). When evaluating for threats identified as being primarily structure based, there was a decrease in SAFER score of 1.28 per every additional PDSA cycle ( P = 0.001). There was a decrease in total count of LST of 0.20 per additional simulation run ( P = 0.02) after controlling for shift type, census, perceived workload, team size, and prior attendance in simulations across all PDSA cycles. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a blueprint for the utilization of in situ simulation through multiple waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic to identify LSTs and use the SAFER score as a surrogate marker to monitor the impact of interventions for a safer environment for both medical staff and patients.

Interprofessional In Situ Simulation to Identify Latent Safety Threats for Quality Improvement: A Single-Center Protocol Report.

In situ simulation has frequently been used to improve team performance and provide an opportunity for the practice of critical skills and identify latent safety threats, which are undetected risks that may lead to adverse outcomes. However, the use of known quality improvement tools to prioritize and mitigate these safety threats is an area requiring further study. Over the course of 9 in situ simulations of a pediatric shock case, postcase debriefs were held to identify latent safety threats in an emergency department and a mixed pediatric and adult inpatient unit. Latent safety threats identified included structure-related threats such as inability to locate critical equipment, knowledge-based threats relating to rapid intravenous fluid administration, and communication-based threats such as lack of role designation. Identification of latent safety threats in the health care environment may assist clinician leaders in mitigating risk of patient harm. The protocol described may be adopted and applied to other critical event simulations, with structured debriefing used as a tool to identify and mitigate threats before they affect the patient.

The Comparative Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Versus E-Module on the Training of Donning and Doffing Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized, Simulation-Based Educational Study.

Introduction Preventing errors in donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) is critical for limiting the spread of infectious diseases. Virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated itself as an effective tool for asynchronous learning, but its use in PPE training has not been tested. The objective of this study was to compare donning and doffing performance between VR and e-module PPE training. Methods A prospective randomized open-blinded controlled trial was conducted to determine differences in donning and doffing performance after VR and e-module PPE training among medical staff and medical students at a single institution. The primary outcome was donning and doffing performance with real PPE, assessed using a 64-point checklist. The secondary outcome was participant preparedness and confidence level after training.  Results Fifty-four participants were randomized, mostly consisting of medical students (n=24 {44%}) or emergency medicine and otolaryngology residents (n=19 {35%}). The VR group (n=27 {50%}) performed better than the control in the overall PPE scores but this was not statistically significant (mean {SD}, VR: 55.4 {4.4} vs e-module: 53.3 {8.1}; p = 0.40). VR participants also reported higher levels of preparedness and confidence after training. Residents as a subgroup achieved the highest increases after VR training compared to their counterparts in the control training group (mean {SD}, VR: 55.6 {4.9} vs e-module 48.4 {5.5}, p = 0.009).  Conclusion In this randomized trial, VR training was found to be non-inferior to e-module for asynchronous PPE training. Our results suggest that in particular residents may benefit most from VR PPE training. Additionally, VR participants felt more confident and prepared to don and doff PPE after training compared to e-module participants. These findings are particularly relevant given the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Future studies need to focus on VR integration into residency curriculum and monitoring for long-term skill retention.

Safety Considerations for In Situ Simulation in Closed SARS-CoV-2 Units.

SUMMARY STATEMENT: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic placed a tremendous strain on the healthcare system, which led to the deployment of new personnel into acute care settings, early graduation of medical students, and development of new treatment spaces. Education teams at the Montefiore Health System and New York Health and Hospitals/Jacobi Medical Center found simulation, both laboratory-based and in situ, critical to the training of medical staff and investigation of latent safety threats. Through our experience, we encountered unique infection control concerns based on in situ sessions, which prompted us to redesign our programs for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. Using this experience, we outline our rationale for the use of in situ simulation for newly developed SARS-CoV-2 spaces along with recommendations on safety checks to consider before starting.

Successful Pancreatic Cancer Screening Among Individuals at Elevated Risk Using Endoscopic Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Community Hospital Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Guidelines for testing individuals at risk (IAR) for developing pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (PC) are being advanced from university hospital populations. We implemented a screen-in criteria and protocol for IAR for PC in our community hospital setting. METHODS: Eligibility was based on germline status and/or family history of PC. Longitudinal testing continued, alternating between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary objective was to analyze pancreatic conditions and their associations with risk factors. The secondary objective was to evaluate the outcomes and complications resulting from testing. RESULTS: Over 93 months, 102 individuals completed baseline EUS, and 26 (25%) met defined endpoints of any abnormal findings in the pancreas. Average enrollment was 40 months, and all participants with endpoints continued standard surveillance. Two participants (1.8%) had endpoint findings requiring surgery for premalignant lesions. Increasing age predicted for endpoint findings. Analysis of longitudinal testing suggested reliability between the EUS and MRI results. CONCLUSIONS: In our community hospital population, baseline EUS was effective in identifying the majority of findings; advancing age correlated with a greater chance of abnormalities. No differences were observed between EUS and MRI findings. Screening programs for PC among IAR can be successfully performed in the community setting.

The Development of an Assessment Rubric for the Core and Contingency Team Interaction Among Rapid Response Teams.

INTRODUCTION: Teamwork training is critical in the development of high-functioning rapid response teams (RRT). Rapid response teams involve interactions between a patient's core care team and a hospital contingency team, which can lead to disorganized and unsafe resuscitations, largely due to problems with communication and information dissemination. An extensive literature search found no assessment tools specific to the unique communicative challenges of an RRT, and thus, this study sought to develop an assessment rubric validated for training RRTs. METHODS: This study elucidates the development, implementation, and testing of an RRT rubric based on Kane's framework for validating testing instruments. Twenty-four inpatient code teams underwent team training using a Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) didactic, an online module on the TeamSTEPPS RRT program, and a subsequent presimulation and postsimulation experience. Two raters were randomized to give a bedside assessment for each team using the proposed RRT rubric. Simulation scores were assessed with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Interrater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. These analyses were then used to argue Kane's scoring, generalization, and extrapolation inferences. RESULTS: All teams significantly improved from the presimulation to postsimulation scenarios across all TeamSTEPPS domains. Content validity was obtained from 5 resuscitation experts with a scale-level content validity index of 0.9, with individual content validity index of 0.8 to 1.0. Intraclass correlation coefficient for "pre" scores were 0.856 (n = 24, P < 0.001), "post" scores of 0.738 (n = 24, P < 0.001), and a total of 0.890 (n = 48, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The authors argue for the validity of a new RRT rubric based off Kane's framework, with a specific focus on teamwork training to improve coordination and function of core and contingency teams. A follow-up study with longitudinal data along with external validation of this rubric is needed.

Using a Logic Model to Enable and Evaluate Long-Term Outcomes of a Mass Casualty Training Program: A Single Center Case Study.

PURPOSE: Global health disasters are on the rise and can occur at any time with little advance warning, necessitating preparation. The authors created a comprehensive evidence-based Emergency Preparedness Training Program focused on long-term retention and sustained learner engagement. METHOD: A prospective observational study was conducted of a simulation-based mass casualty event training program designed using an outcomes-based logic model. A total of 25 frontline healthcare workers from multiple hospital sites in the New York metropolitan area participated in an 8-hour immersive workshop. Data was collected from assessments, and surveys provided to participants 3 weeks prior to the workshop, immediately following the workshop, and 3 months after completion of the workshop. RESULTS: The mean percentage of total knowledge scores improved across pre-workshop, post-workshop and retention (3 months post-workshop) assessments (53.2% vs. 64.8% vs. 67.6%, P < 0.05). Average comfort scores in the core MCI competencies increased across pre-workshop, post-workshop and retention self-assessments (P < 0.01). Of the participants assessed at 3 months retention (n = 14, 56%), 50.0% (n = 7) assisted in updating their hospital's emergency operations plan and 50.0% (n = 7) pursued further self-directed learning in disaster preparedness medicine. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the logic model provided a transparent framework for the design, implementation, and evaluation of a competency-based EPT program at a single academic center.

The Impact of a Mobile Phone Application for Retention of Bleeding Control Skills.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Bleeding Control Course (B-Con) empowers bystanders with hemorrhage control skills to manage prehospital emergencies, but demonstrates poor skill retention. The point of care use of a free Stop the Bleed mobile phone application on the retention of hemorrhage control skills from the B-Con Course was explored. METHODS: Convenience sample of college students previously trained in B-Con were randomized into mobile application (MA) or control groups. The use of a mobile application during a simulated emergency scenario with tourniquet and situational awareness skills was assessed. Wound packing skill retention without intervention was also assessed. Survey data allowed for comparison of participant perceptions of skills with actual performances. RESULTS: MA (n = 30) was superior to control (n = 32) in correct tourniquet application (62.5% versus 30.0%; P = 0.01) with longer placement times (163 sec versus 95 sec; P < 0.001) and in calling 911 (31.3% versus 3.3%, P = 0.004). Participants maintain inflated perceptions of their skills, but generally feel underprepared for a future bleeding emergency. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile apps improve tourniquet and situational awareness skills and may serve as potential aids to improve bystander hemorrhage control skills in real-time, but require further prospective investigation into its use.

Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Emergency Cricothyrotomy Task Trainer.

Background Emergency cricothyrotomy is a critical, yet infrequently performed and time-sensitive procedure that requires practice in order to be reliably completed in emergent airway situations. Many physicians never have the opportunity to practice this rarely performed but highly impactful procedure during their training due to a lack of an affordable, high-fidelity training model. In this study, the educational impact and realism of a new synthetic cricothyrotomy training model (high-fidelity emergency cricothyrotomy, HiFEC) were compared with those of a standard porcine explant model. Methodology A total of thirty-one attending physicians from four medical specialties were recruited on a volunteer basis to participate in a cricothyrotomy simulation workshop. Participants were randomly assigned to complete the initial workshop using one of the two models but had the opportunity to practice on both trainers. Pre- and post-workshop comfort level as well as the realism of the models were surveyed using questionnaires and evaluated using a five-point Likert scale. Results Improvements in self-reported comfort levels were seen in both the porcine group (p = 0.0014) and HiFEC group (p = 0.0036) as well as overall (p < 0.001). The realism rating of both training models was similar with a median score of 4 on a five-point Likert scale. When comparing the cost of conducting our workshop using these models, the synthetic model saved over $650. Conclusions Given the similar realism of the models and the improvement in participant comfort level, the synthetic HiFEC trainer is an effective and more affordable alternative training model for emergency cricothyrotomies.

Predictors for inpatient mortality during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic overwhelmed healthcare systems, highlighting the need to better understand predictors of mortality and the impact of medical interventions. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined data from every patient who tested positive for COVID-19 and was admitted to White Plains Hospital between March 9, 2020, and June 3, 2020. We used binomial logistic regression to analyze data for all patients, and propensity score matching for those treated with hydroxychloroquine and convalescent plasma (CP). The primary outcome of interest was inpatient mortality. RESULTS: 1,108 admitted patients with COVID-19 were available for analysis, of which 124 (11.2%) were excluded due to incomplete data. Of the 984 patients included, 225 (22.9%) died. Risk for death decreased for each day later a patient was admitted [OR 0.970, CI 0.955 to 0.985; p < 0.001]. Elevated initial C-reactive protein (CRP) value was associated with a higher risk for death at 96 hours [OR 1.007, 1.002 to 1.012; p = 0.006]. Hydroxychloroquine and CP administration were each associated with increased mortality [OR 3.4, CI 1.614 to 7.396; p = 0.002, OR 2.8560, CI 1.361 to 6.160; p = 0.006 respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated CRP carried significant odds of early death. Hydroxychloroquine and CP were each associated with higher risk for death, although CP was without titers and was administered at a median of five days from admission. Randomized or controlled studies will better describe the impact of CP. Mortality decreased as the pandemic progressed, suggesting that institutional capacity for dynamic evaluation of process and outcome measures may benefit COVID-19 survival.

The Addition of High-Technology Into the Stop the Bleed Program Among School Personnel Improves Short-Term Skill Application, Not Long-Term Retention.

INTRODUCTION: The Stop the Bleed (STB) program trains the general public on identifying and treating life-threatening bleeding. Data on efficacy and retention of skills taught through this program are limited, with the role of high-technology modalities to augment the program, such as simulation and feedback devices, untested. METHODS: A convenience sample of 66 school personnel participated in an open-label observational study from January to August 2019. The control group received the standard bleeding control course, while the intervention group received the bleeding control course with addition of a simulation and a feedback device for wound packing. Assessment was performed by STB instructors using performance metrics from prior studies as well as a feedback device. Retention testing was performed 2 to 8 months after intervention. The study was approved by the hospital's institutional review board. RESULTS: The intervention group performed better than the control group on correct tourniquet application [90.3% vs. 71.0%; odds ratio (OR) = 11.28; P = 0.015; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.86 to 104.67] wound packing scores (59.5% vs. 29.6%; OR = 0.33; P = 0.007; 95% CI = 9.36 to 56.00) and were more likely to assess their safety (OR = 5.49; P = 0.034; 95% CI = 1.28 to 27.66), and reported higher comfort scores on stepping into an emergency scenario (OR = 11.19; P = 0.004; 95% CI = 2.51 to 63.11), wound packing (OR = 5.16; P = 0.025; 95% CI = 1.35 to 22.46), and using a tourniquet (OR = 11.41; P = 0.003; 95% CI = 2.57 to 67.59). Thirty-one participants (46.9%) were assessed again at retention 2 to 8 months later where scores for tourniquet placement and wound packing were not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Augmenting STB with simulation and feedback improved both self-reported comfort level and skill set of participants, but the retention of skills was poor in both groups.