Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anesth Essays Res ; 16(2): 203-207, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36447913

RESUMO

Background and Objectives: The study sought to compare the postoperative analgesia after ultrasonography (USG)-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus quadratus lumborum (QL) 1 block with lower concentration of bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower-segment cesarean section (LSCS). Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital, Bengaluru, from 2019 to 2021. Fifty-six patients belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Class I and II aged 20-40 years posted for LSCS under subarachnoid block were divided into two groups. Patients in Group I were given bilateral TAP block and patients in Group II were given bilateral QL1 block under USG guidance at the end of surgery using 0.125% bupivacaine (20 ml) and 4 mg dexamethasone. Patients were monitored for postoperative pain with Numerical Pain Intensity Scale (NPIS) at 0, 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h. Rescue analgesic was given if NPIS score was 6 or more. Time to first dose of rescue analgesic was noted. NPIS scores and time to rescue analgesic were compared using independent t test. P < 5% was considered statistically significant. Results: Average NPIS scores were less at 0, 1, and 4 h (<6) and higher at 8, 12, and 24 h in both the groups postoperatively. NPIS scores at 8 h were significantly higher in Group I compared to Group II (P = 0.02). Time to first dose of rescue analgesic was 7.32 h in Group I and 9.07 h in Group II (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Postoperative analgesia was better with USG-guided QL1 block versus USG-guided TAP block with 0.125% bupivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone in patients undergoing LSCS.

2.
Indian J Anaesth ; 66(12): 854-860, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36654893

RESUMO

Background and Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant infections among healthcare workers and deaths warranting the need for personal protective equipment. This study aimed to estimate the proportion of anaesthesiologists adhering to safety precautions and to evaluate their adherence patterns, difficulties faced and coping mechanisms in the operation theatre during the pandemic. Methods: This was a multicentric mixed methods study conducted among anaesthesiologists from two tertiary care hospitals. A paper-based questionnaire was given to all participants. The first part consisted of 21 questions regarding safety measures and extent of adherence. The second part was a response sheet regarding the various difficulties faced and coping mechanisms adopted. Following this, an in-depth interview was conducted to understand the same. The proportion of anaesthesiologists in different categories of adherence, patterns of adherence, difficulties faced, and coping mechanisms were computed and compared. Thematic framework analysis was done for in-depth interview. Results: Sixty participants were included. The adherence levels for N95 masks and face shields were higher. Most participants practised frequent handwashing and took showers after work. Fogging, difficulty in communication, marks on the face were the commonly faced difficulties. Self reassurance, adjusting the fit of masks/face shields, or taking breaks were the coping mechanisms mostly followed. Themes generated from in-depth interview include waning of caution, adaptation through innovative methods and stress due to uncertainty. Conclusion: The N95 mask was the most preferred safety precaution. Ease of use and safety were important considerations for adherence. Physical and mental acclimatisation and improved knowledge of disease played a vital role.

3.
Anesth Essays Res ; 9(1): 118-20, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25886436

RESUMO

Hyperhomocysteinemia is a genetic disorder of metabolism and transport of amino acid, commonly present as a pro-coagulant state. Evan's syndrome is an autoimmune disorder with pancytopenia, a diagnosis of exclusion. The present report highlights the anesthetic management of a rare case, where both these clinical entities coexist. A 26-year-old male, a known case of hyperhomocyteinemia on medication for 4 years, came with a history of severe headache, blurring of vision and bleeding gums. Computerized tomography brain report showed subdural hematoma (SDH) of 16 mm with 9 mm right midline shift and on investigation had thrombocytopenia (5000 cells/cumm). Patient was diagnosed to have Evan's syndrome. Because he was refractory to the medical management, taken up for emergency splenectomy, followed by burr hole evacuation of SDH. Successful anesthetic management of the case is presented in this report.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...