RESUMO
A recent resolution with approximately 100 signatories entitled "Sunsetting All Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Programs" administered by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) sparked controversial debate within the field. Despite the AAD voting against the proposal to eliminate DEI initiatives, many underrepresented medical groups (URMs) wondered how to move forward and create safe spaces for everyone. We discuss the relevance of DEI programs in today's society and the ethical challenges that may arise. We conclude with actionable recommendations on how organizations can improve their current DEI strategies to ensure they are more inclusive and not perceived as discriminatory.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dermatologists are trained in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for cutaneous lesions, yet comparative trends for basic dermatologic procedures across dermatology providers are lacking at the national level. OBJECTIVE: To trend common dermatologic procedures among general dermatologists, Mohs surgeons, primary care providers or primary care physicians (PCPs), and nonphysician clinicians (NPCs). METHODS: Longitudinal analysis of 2016 to 2021 Medicare Public Use Files. RESULTS: Aggregate dermatologic procedural volume decreased 3.0%. Procedural volume declined among general dermatologists (-11.7%), Mohs surgeons (-16.7%), and PCPs (-41.7%) but increased among NPCs (+57.5%). The proportion of procedures by general dermatologists decreased substantially for premalignant destructions (-6.2%), skin biopsies and shave removals (-4.7%), and malignant excisions (-4.1%) and more notably in counties that were nonmetro (-7.1%), low in income (-6.1%), and with <4.0 dermatologists per 100,000 population (-7.0%). CONCLUSION: Aggregate procedural volume decreased across the study period with general dermatologists, Mohs surgeons, and PCPs performing a progressively smaller proportion. The increase in procedures by NPCs may help to address demand but underscores the value of formalized procedural training. The procedural decline by general dermatologists in rural and low-income counties and those with baseline dermatologist shortages may exacerbate existing unmet need. Primary limitation included lack of commercial data.
RESUMO
Doxxing, a type of cyberbullying, occurs when an individual's personal information is shared without consent and with malintent. Doxxing can be seen as a form of vigilantism, a way to hold others accountable for their actions or opinions; however, this form of justice can have catastrophic impacts on the victim, especially physicians. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, where physicians and healthcare providers strongly led public health advocacy efforts on social media, the frequency of doxxing and cyberbullying has increased. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have also recently sparked controversy in dermatology and medicine, where advocates for DEI and those opposed to DEI initiatives have also been doxxed. This behavior is incredibly taxing on an individual's mental health, with substantial negative implications on a person's social, personal, and professional life. We discuss the ethical considerations of doxxing and avenues for better protecting physicians.
RESUMO
Despite most Americans having healthcare coverage, coverage does not equate to access. For many, healthcare coverage is being threatened by contractual disagreements between major health insurers and hospitals. In New York, in efforts to control costs, Aetna and United Healthcare have recently engaged in contentious contract negotiations with NewYork-Presbyterian and Mount Sinai medical centers, resulting in unprecedented ripples in patients' health plans and access. These disruptions have been shown to negatively impact patient health and result in patients managing their treatment at steep out-of-pocket rates or scrambling to find new providers in-network. We discuss the ethical implications of fallouts between insurance companies and hospitals and their impacts on patients.
RESUMO
Race, ethnicity, language, sex, age, income, insurance status, location, and other socioeconomic and demographic factors influence access to and quality of care for patients with psoriasis, which can potentially lead to inequitable outcomes.
