RESUMO
Anesthesia for fetal and neonatal surgery requires subspecialized knowledge and expertise. Attention to important anatomic, physiologic, and metabolic differences seen in pregnancy and at birth are essential for the optimal care of these patients. Thorough preoperative evaluations tailored intraoperative strategies and careful postoperative management are critical when devising the anesthetic approach for each of these cases.
Assuntos
Anestesia , Anestésicos , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Humanos , Feto/cirurgia , Feto/fisiologia , Anestésicos/uso terapêutico , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Cuidado Pré-NatalRESUMO
The use of medical tattoos can potentially be life-saving. We present a 16-year-old patient who chose to tattoo a medical condition on her forearm. Her tattoo is more extensive than most medical tattoos and shows the measures a mother will take to ensure her daughter's safety. To our knowledge, there are no published guidelines recommending an ideal location or symbology for a medical tattoo. Such guidelines would be useful to artists, as well as to medical personnel in emergencies if the patient has a tattoo.
Assuntos
Etiquetas de Emergência Médica , Tatuagem , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Segurança do PacienteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends including the parents in completion of the pediatric surgical safety checklist. At our hospital, the preinduction surgical safety checklist is conducted in the preoperative holding with anesthesia, nursing, and often with the parents of children undergoing an operative procedure. We hypothesized that adherence to the preinduction checklist is better when parents are engaged in surgical safety checklist performance. METHODS: An observational study of adherence to the preinduction checklist for nonemergent pediatric operations was performed (2016-2017). Adherence was defined as verbalization of checkpoints. Only checkpoints (patient identification, procedure, site marking, weight, allergies, and NPO status) relevant to parental knowledge were evaluated. Parental engagement was based on: positive body language, eye contact, lack of distractions, and understanding of checkpoints. RESULTS: 484 preinduction surgical safety checklists were observed (interrater reliability >0.7). Partial completion occurred in 55% cases; only 41% checklists were fully completed. Parents were present for 81% of checklists, and more checkpoints were performed when parents were present (5, IQR 4-6) versus absent (2, IQR 1-3, P < .001). Increased preinduction adherence was associated with increased parent engagement by linear regression analysis (1.20, 95%CI 1.05-1.33). Staff confirmed more checkpoints with engaged parents (28-78%) versus when parents were not engaged (1-9%, P < .001 for all checkpoints). CONCLUSION: Overall preinduction surgical safety checklist performance was poor (less than half of checklists fully completed). In contrast, checklist adherence improved with parental presence and engagement during performance of the checklist.