Trochanteric Fixation Nail® with Helical Blade Compared with Femoral Neck Screw for Operative Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to compare outcomes of the Trochanteric Fixation Nail (TFN®) with a helical blade versus TFN® with a femoral neck screw for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single center, retrospective cohort study. Patients (>18 years of age) with an intertrochanteric femoral fracture, who were operated on between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016 were included. Primary and secondary outcome measures were cut-out rate and intervention variables, respectively. Data from X-ray examinations and patient medical files were collected and analyzed. The chi-square test or Student's t-test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 631 patients were surgically treated for an intertrochanteric femoral fracture. Of this group, 239 patients (37.9%) were treated with a TFN® with helical blade and 392 patients (62.1%) with a TFN® with femoral neck screw. There were no statistically significant differences between the baseline characteristics of both groups. A total of 17 (2.7%) cut-outs were recorded, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.19). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcome measures between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There are no statistically significant differences in primary and secondary outcomes following treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with the TFN® helical blade or TFN® femoral neck screw. These findings suggest that the choice of collum implant for the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures cannot be made based on the surgical outcomes of the two implants evaluated here.

More adverse events than expected in the outcome after use of the reamer-irrigator-aspirator.

PURPOSE: The reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) system is described as having high success rates and only few complications. The RIA was originally designed to ream the intramedullary canal in a single step prior to the placement of an intramedullary nail for femur fixation. Its purpose was to collect and evacuate marrow contents during reaming to prevent embolism into the systemic circulation. Marrow evacuation is also used to stimulate healing in nonunion fractures, segmental bone defects, and osteomyelitis. Despite the described success rates, we experienced severe adverse events. Our aim was to describe these events and point out possible complications. METHODS: A retrospective study of all consecutive patients treated for nonunion fractures, bone defects, or osteomyelitis from October 2007 to March 2010. All patients were treated with the RIA system. We analyzed demographic characteristics, consolidation on X-rays, time from injury to healing, complications, and postoperative pain caused by the reaming procedure. RESULTS: We included 32 patients (21 males) with an average follow-up of 277 days. Successful healing was achieved in 66 % of all patients, and 18 % suffered from postoperative pain. A complication due to the use of the RIA system was registered in 31 % of the patients. Recorded complications were bone defects, signs of lung embolism, a myocardial infarction, and fissure fractures. CONCLUSIONS: The RIA system has benefits in the treatment of nonunion and osteomyelitis defect, but is not without risk. Meticulous surgical technique is mandatory and peroperative constant monitoring of patients and the assembled device is mandatory.

Hip fracture surgery and performance indicators: an analysis of 941 patients operated in a large teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, two performance indicators for the treatment of hip fracture patients have been recently implemented. Both indicators state that surgery within 24 h after admission improves the outcome with regard to 1-year mortality and the amount of re-operations within 1 year. To determine the value of these performance indicators, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 941 hip fracture patients. METHODS: In the period from January 2003 to December 2006, a total of 941 consecutive hip fracture patients were included in this study. We determined the amount of re-operations and the mortality at 1 year after surgery. From June 2005 to December 2006, we could determine whether patients were operated on within 24 h after admission. In this group of 379 patients, we determined if there were differences in the 1-year mortality and the number of re-operations at 1 year with regard to the time window in which these patients were operated on (<24 h or >24 h). RESULTS: Our overall mortality rate at 1 year is 21% (202 patients) and the amount of re-operations within 1 year is 8% (77 procedures). In our subgroup analysis, we found no significant difference in mortality or re-operations if patients were operated on within 24 h or not (number needed to treat of 59 and -31, respectively). CONCLUSION: We conclude that hip fracture surgery within 24 h does not provide significantly better results in terms of 1-year mortality and the amount of re-operations within 1 year.

Pitfalls in determining knee alignment: a radiographic cadaver study.

Full-length anteroposterior (AP) radiographs provide the basis for evaluating leg alignment. A cadaver study was performed to determine the effect of knee flexion and hip rotation on projected angles on full-length AP radiographs. The outcomes were verified mathematically. The results of the cadaver study were similar to the mathematical results. Flexion of the knee without rotation of the lower extremity has little effect on angles as projected on full-length AP radiographs. Rotation of the lower extremity without flexion of the knee also has little effect. Simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg, however, cause large changes in projected angles. Full-length radiographs can be taken without fluoroscopic control as long as the knee can be fully extended. In flexion contracture, a full-length AP radiograph taken under lateral fluoroscopic control is necessary to obtain accurate determination of the mechanical axis.

Osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee can be treated with a correction osteotomy. The goal of the correction osteotomy is to transfer the load bearing from the pathologic to the normal compartment of the knee. A successful outcome of the osteotomy relies on proper patient selection, stage of osteoarthritis, achievement and maintenance of adequate operative correction. This is an update of the original review published in Issue 1, 2005. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of an osteotomy for treating osteoarthritis of the knee. SEARCH STRATEGY: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE (Current contents, Health STAR) up to October 2002 in the original review and in the update until May 2007. Reference lists of identified trials were screened. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and controlled clinical trials comparing a high tibial osteotomy or a distal femoral osteotomy in patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the medial or lateral compartment of the knee. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data and assessed trial quality. Due to heterogeneity of the studies, pooling of outcome measures was not possible. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen studies involving over 693 people were included; 11 studies were included in the first version and two studies and one longer follow-up study were included in this update. All studies concerned a valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Six studies, in which two studies were included in this update, compared two techniques of HTO. One study compared HTO alone versus HTO with additional treatment. Four studies compared within the same type of HTO, different peri-operative conditions (two studies) or two different types of post-operative treatment (two studies). Two studies, including the longer follow up, compared HTO with unicompartmental joint replacement. No study compared an osteotomy with conservative treatment. Most studies showed improvement of the patient (less pain and improvement of function scores) after osteotomy surgery, but in the majority of the studies there was no significant difference with other operative treatment (other technique of HTO/ unicompartmental joint replacement). Overall, the methodological quality was low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on 13 studies, we conclude that there is 'silver' level evidence (www.cochranemsk.org) that valgus HTO improves knee function and reduces pain. There is no evidence whether an osteotomy is more effective than conservative treatment and the results so far do not justify a conclusion about effectiveness of specific surgical techniques.

Osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee can be treated with a correction osteotomy. The goal of the correction osteotomy is to transfer the load bearing from the pathologic to the normal compartment of the knee. A successful outcome of the osteotomy relies on proper patient selection, stage of osteoarthritis, achievement and maintenance of adequate operative correction. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of an osteotomy for treating osteoarthritis of the knee. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE (Current contents, Health STAR) were searched up until October 2002 for controlled clinical trials. The reference lists of publications in the identified trials were also screened. SELECTION CRITERIA: Extracted studies were included in the final analysis if they met the pre-defined inclusion criteria: 1) a randomised controlled clinical trial or a controlled clinical trial 2) all patients had unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the medial or lateral compartment of the knee 3) the intervention in one of the studied groups was a high tibial osteotomy or a distal femoral osteotomy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected the trials, assessed the methodological quality using a validated tool and extracted the data. The planned analysis was to pool the results where appropriate, however, due the heterogeneity of the studies, pooling of the outcome measures was not possible. Results are described for each study and presented as a best evidence synthesis. MAIN RESULTS: Following the search strategy and applications of selection criteria, eleven studies were included in this review. All the studies concerned a valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Four studies compared two techniques of HTO. One study compared HTO alone versus HTO with additional treatment. Four studies compared within the same type of HTO, different per-operative conditions (two studies) or two different types of post-operative treatment (two studies). Two studies compared HTO with unicompartmental joint replacement. No study compared an osteotomy with conservative treatment. Most studies showed improvement of the patient (less pain and improvement of function scores) after osteotomy surgery, but in the majority of the studies there was no significant difference with other operative treatment (other technique of HTO/ unicompartmental joint replacement). Overall, the methodological quality was low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on 11 studies, of which 6 were high quality, we conclude that there is silver level evidence that valgus HTO improves knee function and reduces pain. There is no evidence whether an osteotomy is more effective than conservative treatment and the results so far do not justify a conclusion about effectiveness of specific surgical techniques.

Braces and orthoses for treating osteoarthritis of the knee.

BACKGROUND: Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee can be treated with a brace or orthosis (shoe insole). The main purpose of these aids is to reduce pain, improve physical function and, possibly, to slow disease progression. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of a brace or orthosis in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE (Current contents, Health STAR) up to October 2002. The reference lists of the publications in the identified trials were also screened. SELECTION CRITERIA: Extracted studies were included in the final analysis if they met the pre-defined inclusion criteria: 1) a randomised controlled clinical trial or a controlled clinical trial, 2) all patients had osteoarthritis of the knee, 3) the intervention in one of the studied groups was a brace or an orthosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected the trials and assessed the methodological quality using the Delphi-list and one additional question about care programs. Three reviewers independently extracted the data on the intervention, type of outcome measures, follow-up, loss to follow-up, and results, using a pre-tested standardized form. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Four trials involving a total of 444 people were included in this review. One study investigated a knee brace and three studies examined different types of orthoses for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Two studies were of high methodological quality while the other two studies were low. Notably, the randomisation and the blinding procedures were either insufficient or not described. The follow-up period (six weeks to six months) was too short to demonstrate long-term results. Pooling was difficult primarily due to the heterogeneity of the data and the way the information was presented. The pain, stiffness and physical function (WOMAC and MACTAR) scores of a brace group showed greater improvement at six months compared with a neoprene sleeve group, which showed greater improvement compared with a control group. The numbers of days of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) intake decreased significantly (relative percentage difference 23.9%) compared with baseline in a group with laterally wedged insoles,and remained unchanged in the neutrally wedged group. Patient compliance with the laterally wedged insole was significantly better compared with the neutrally wedged insole. In one study, the Visual Analogue Pain (VAS) pain score was significantly decreased from baseline in a strapped insole group (RPD - 24%), but not in the traditional lateral wedge group, but this strapped insole showed more adverse effects (popliteal pain, low back pain, and foot sole pain) compared with the traditional lateral wedge insole. Pain during bed rest, after getting up, after getting up from seated position and walking distance was significantly improved in a subtalar strapped group compared with baseline, and no improvement was found in a sock type group. No studies were found that assessed the effectiveness of a brace or orthosis to treat lateral compartment osteoarthritis or general osteoarthritis of the knee, or that compared a knee brace with a wedge insole, or that compared a brace or orthosis with operative treatment. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on one brace study we conclude there is limited evidence that: a brace has additional beneficial effect (WOMAC, MACTAR, function tests) for knee osteoarthritis compared with medical treatment alone.(Silver) a sleeve has additional beneficial effect (WOMAC, function tests) for knee osteoarthritis compared with medical treatment alone.(Silver) a brace is more effective (WOMAC, function tests) than a neoprene sleeve.(Silver) Based on 3 orthoses studies, of which 2 were high quality, (n=2) we conclude there is limited evidence that: a laterally wedged insole decreases NSAID intake compared with a neutral insole. (Silver) patient compliance is better in the laterally wedged insole compared with a neutral insole. (Silver) a strapped insole has more adverse effects than a lateral wedge insole. (Silver).