Impact of essential hypertension and primary aldosteronism on plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration.

INTRODUCTION: Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) has important role in the diagnosis and management of heart failure. Data on the impact of blood pressure (BP) on BNP are controversial. In primary aldosteronism (PA), BNP production can be affected by both hypertension and specific endocrine mechanisms. This study was aimed at investigating the impact of hypertension and hyperaldosteronism on plasma BNP levels. METHODS: Plasma BNP concentration, casual and 24-h BP and echocardiographic indices were assessed in 40 patients with moderate to severe essential hypertension (EH), 40 BP-matched patients with PA, and 40 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. RESULTS: BNP levels in PA and EH groups did not differ significantly and were higher compared with those in controls [median and interquartile range 26 (13-48) pg/ml, p = 0.01, and 23 (9-32) pg/ml, n.s., vs 14 (6-26) pg/ml in controls]. Remarkably elevated BNP was observed only in three PA and two EH patients, all having significant left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. BNP levels in PA and EH groups correlated weakly with casual and 24-h BP, interventricular septal thickness and LV mass index (LVMI). Diastolic BP and LVMI were identified as the strongest independent determinants of BNP (p = 0.002 and p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both PA and EH patients had modest and mutually comparable elevation of BNP, which was independently determined by diastolic BP and LVMI. Both subtypes of PA (aldosterone-producing adenoma and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia) had similar effect on BNP production. Specific impact of hyperaldosteronism on BNP was not confirmed.

Renal and ureteric trauma: diagnosis and management in Poland.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse retrospectively kidney and ureteric injuries (the former often associated with multiple-organ trauma) and thus optimize diagnostic and treatment methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records and details of kidney and ureteric injures treated between 1995 and 1999 in 61 urological departments in Poland were analysed. RESULTS: In all, 887 kidney injuries were analysed; blunt trauma comprised 97%, with most injuries classified as renal contusion and minor parenchymal damage (687 cases). Intravenous urography was used in 80% of the patients and computed tomography in only 20%. In all, 234 patients (26%) underwent surgery; nephrectomy was the most common surgical treatment, in 170 patients (73% of those undergoing surgery). Complications occurred in 9% of patients after conservative treatment and in 5% after surgery. Of the 452 ureteric injuries, 340 (75%) were iatrogenic, 81 (18%) blunt injuries and 31 (7%) open injuries. Of the iatrogenic injuries 73% occurred during gynaecological procedures, 14% in general surgery and 14% in urological procedures. The most frequent diagnostic method was intravenous urography (244 cases), with retrograde pyelography (98) and ureteric catheterization in 125. The diagnosis was established immediately during surgery in 104 patients. The most frequent surgical treatment was uretero-neocystostomy (213, 47%), the others being a Boari flap (113, 25%), end-to-end anastomosis (92, 20%), reconstruction with an ileal loop (30, 7%) and autotransplantation (four, 1%). CONCLUSION: In Poland, patients with blunt kidney injuries often undergo surgery, with nephrectomy the most frequent procedure. Computed tomography with the intravenous administration of contrast medium should be considered the diagnostic method of choice for kidney injures. Catheterization of the ureters before surgery and an indigocarmine intravenous infusion (to stain the urine) when a ureteric injury is suspected may reduce the rate of iatrogenic injury and improve the rate of intraoperative diagnosis. We suggest catheterizing the ureters in any doubtful case to avoid injury, because prevention is better than treatment.

Treatment of posterior and anterior urethral trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the occurrence and treatment of posterior urethral (most often caused by traffic accidents and comprising half of all cases of urinary tract traumas) and anterior urethral injury (usually iatrogenic during catheterization or cystoscopy, or caused by blunt trauma, e.g. straddle injury or penetrating trauma). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records and details of patients with posterior and anterior urethral trauma were analysed from 61 urological departments in Poland between 1995 and 1999. RESULTS: During the 5-year period there were 268 cases of posterior and 255 of anterior urethral injury; for the former, most occurred during traffic accidents, and of the latter 206 were iatrogenic (during catheterization or cystoscopy), of which 48 were accompanied by perineal injury. The posterior injuries were isolated or involved many organs, mainly pelvic bones. Both types of injuries were diagnosed using ascending urethrography, voiding cysto-urethrography and urethroscopy/endoscopy. Treatment for posterior injuries included cystostomy alone or cystostomy with abdominal drainage or perineal drainage; some patients also had their urethra reconstructed. The treatment for anterior injuries was conservative in 193 patients and surgical in 62. CONCLUSION: The early detection and appropriate surgical treatment of posterior and anterior urethral injury is crucial for the recovery of urethral function, and avoids many complications.

External and iatrogenic trauma of the urinary bladder: a survey in Poland.

OBJECTIVE: To assess incidence of urinary bladder injuries (frequently associated with pelvic trauma and often iatrogenic) in Poland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records and details of urinary bladder injuries treated between 1995 and 1999 were analysed for 61 urological departments in Poland. RESULTS: During the 5-year period 512 patients had urinary bladder injuries; in 210 (41%) the injury was caused by a road traffic accident, in eight (2%) by compression (crushing injury) within the limits of the pelvic bones, in 40 (8%) by a fall from a height, in three by a gunshot wound and in the remaining 251 (49%) the injury was iatrogenic. Among the 261 bladder injuries that were not iatrogenic, 41 (16%) were associated with pelvic bone trauma. In 36 patients there was simultaneous injury of the urinary bladder and posterior urethra, constituting 14% of such injuries and 7% of all trauma cases. The iatrogenic injuries were in 98 patients (39%) in urological departments, in 130 (52%) women in gynaecological departments and in 23 (9%) on surgical wards. The injury was open in 102 patients (20%) and closed in 372 (73%); there was bladder contusion in 38 patients (7%). The injuries were intraperitoneal in 225 patients (44%) and extraperitoneal in 287 (56%). For diagnosis, abdominal ultrasonography was used in 455 (89%) patients, intravenous pyelography in 266 (52%), cystography in 388 (76%) and computed tomography in 15 (3%). The delay between trauma and diagnosis was 0.5-124 h. Surgical treatment of the injury comprised a monolayer suture of the bladder wall in 51 patients (10%), a two-layered suture in 461 (90%), perivesical drainage in 468 (91%) and inspection of the peritoneal cavity in 232 (45%). The mean (range) interval between diagnosis and treatment was 14 (7-70) days. Seven patients died after the treatment failed. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half the patients had iatrogenic injuries, of which over half occurred in gynaecological and maternity wards. Thus it is important teach the basic range of urological operations to trainee doctors. The commonest diagnostic method was not ascending cystography but ultrasonography; we recommend ascending cystography be used with at least two views after filling the urinary bladder with approximately 300 mL of contrast medium, with an additional film after emptying the contrast medium. In patients with pelvic bone trauma it is reasonable to use spiral computed tomography with virtual analysis before surgery. A two-layered suture of the bladder wall with perivesical drainage should be used.