Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heliyon ; 10(11): e32461, 2024 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38933946

RESUMO

Objective: Seizure is one of the neurologic manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. There are few studies focused on the outcome of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and seizure. Methods: This was a subgroup analysis of patients with seizure based on a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study of COVID-19 patients admitted in 37 hospitals in the Philippines. Results: A total of 10,881 patients with COVID-19 infection were included. Among these, 27 (0.2 %) patients had pre-existing seizure/epilepsy and 125 (1.1 %) had new-onset seizure. The patients with pre-existing seizure/epilepsy had a mean age of 49 years and majority were males (63.0 %). The patients with new-onset seizure had a mean age of 57 years and majority were males (60.5 %). Among patients with pre-existing seizure/epilepsy, there were no significant differences in the proportion of severe/critical COVID-19 (p = 0.131), all-cause mortality (p = 0.177), full/partial neurologic recovery (p = 0.190), ventilator use (p = 0.106), length of intensive care unit stay (p = 0.276), and length of hospitalization (p = 0.591). Patients with new-onset seizure were 2.65 times more likely to have severe/critical COVID-19 infection (p < 0.001), 3.12 times more likely to die (p < 0.001), and 3.51 times more likely to require a ventilator (p < 0.001) than those without new-onset seizure. New-onset seizure, however, was not significantly associated with full/partial neurologic recovery (p = 0.184) and prolonged length of hospitalization (p = 0.050). Conclusion: Severe/critical COVID-19 infection, higher mortality rate, and use of a ventilator were significantly higher among patients with new-onset seizure but not among patients with pre-existing seizure/epilepsy.

2.
Neurohospitalist ; 12(1): 121-126, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34950399

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Spasm control is essential in the management of tetanus. Benzodiazepines are administered as initial treatment of tetanic spasms; however, sedation may be difficult to attain among patients with methamphetamine use disorder. Neuromuscular blocking agents, which act on an entire different mechanism, can be given to induce paralysis. METHODS: We describe 2 cases of patients with methamphetamine use disorder who were diagnosed with severe tetanus and our experience in the use of rocuronium to control their spasms. We performed a systematic review of the SCOPUS and PubMed databases for case reports and case series describing the use of rocuronium in tetanus patients who also have methamphetamine use disorder. We discussed the clinical features and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 4 cases of patients with substance abuse disorder who had severe tetanus were reported in the literature, including the current cases. The mean age was 28.8 years; all of them male. Trismus, generalized limb and abdominal rigidity were the most common presentation. Three patients underwent emergency tracheostomy. Rocuronium was given as 0.008mg/kg bolus in 1 patient; 2 patients received an intravenous bolus dose of 0.6mg/kg. Infusion dose ranged from 5 to 10 mcg/kg/min. Spasms were controlled within 24-48 hours after giving rocuronium in 3 out of 4 patients. One patient died from complications of dysautonomia and immobility. CONCLUSION: Rocuronium demonstrates a potential role as neuromuscular blocking agent of choice for patients with chronic methamphetamine use disorder and severe tetanus. Management challenges and complications of severe tetanus were also highlighted in this study.

3.
Neurodegener Dis Manag ; 11(2): 177-185, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33703936

RESUMO

Background/objective: Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) is previously given to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) patients. This study aimed to re-examine the effects of IVMP in SPMS. Materials & methods: Major electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. Results: Four randomized controlled trials were included. IVMP may be inferior to mitoxantrone (MTX) in terms of expanded disability status scale (EDSS) improvement. There was no significant difference in terms of EDSS reduction and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plaque reduction when IVMP + MTX were compared with MTX. There is no significant difference between IVMP and cyclophosphamide based on EDSS progression and relapse reduction. Conclusion: IVMP should not be routinely used as treatment for SPMS and is not recommended as an alternative treatment for SPMS.


Lay abstract Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is a subtype of multiple sclerosis that is associated with degeneration of the nervous system. It is a disabling condition and unlike the relapsing-remitting form of multiple sclerosis, the approved medicines for SPMS are fewer and not readily accessible in developing countries because of cost and availability. Thus, neurologists in these areas have fewer treatment options for SPMS. One of these is intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), which is an affordable drug. This study looked at the evidence about IVMP in SPMS. However, the evidences are few and do not support the use of IVMP in SPMS because of a lack of efficacy in reducing disability and abnormal findings in the magnetic resonance imaging.


Assuntos
Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recidiva
4.
BMC Neurol ; 21(1): 11, 2021 Jan 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33419392

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The status of research and scientific outputs with regards to bacterial central nervous system (CNS) infection in southeast Asia (SEA) is unknown. This study aimed to analyze and compare bacterial CNS infection research output of SEA countries in terms of bibliometric indices. METHODS: The major electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, CENTRAL, Clinicaltrials.gov and WPRIM) were searched for studies on bacterial CNS infection in SEA until August 31, 2020. Frequencies, percentages and Spearman's rho correlations were used. RESULTS: There was a total of 648 unique studies on bacterial CNS infection in SEA and it was 657 when double-counted (collaborative studies between SEA countries). Thailand (n=148, 22.5%) and Vietnam (n=142, 21.6%) had the highest number of publications. The most common type of research publication was the case report / case series (n=160, 24.7%). Tuberculous meningitis/tuberculoma (n=176, 26.7%) was the most common topic. This study showed that the %GDP for research and development (R&D) was associated with a higher number of research output. However, the GDP per capita was not associated with any of the bibliometric indices. The total number of neurologists was associated with all of the bibliometric analysis. CONCLUSION: Bacterial CNS infection research output in SEA countries was low in terms of quantity. The %GDP for R&D was associated with the number of research publications. The total number of neurologists was associated with all of the bibliometric indices.


Assuntos
Bibliometria , Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções do Sistema Nervoso Central , Sudeste Asiático , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...