Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 42
Filtrar
1.
J Rheumatol ; 2024 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39009382

RESUMO

We have updated the Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRA) guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with 3 recommendations for the use of glucocorticoids (GCs). The recommendations address the use of short-term GCs for RA flares or as bridging therapy when disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are initiated or changed, and the use of long-term GCs as adjuncts to DMARDs.

2.
J Immunother ; 2024 May 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38764383

RESUMO

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxygluocose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is increasingly used in the evaluation of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Incidental findings of increased vessel wall uptake may prompt the concern for ICI-induced large vessel vasculitis (LVV). Precise radiographic and clinical evaluation is required to determine if this represents true vasculitis, as use of immune suppression and ICI discontinuation can have significant impacts on patient outcomes. We performed a retrospective case analysis of 4 consecutive patients referred to 2 rheumatology clinics treated with ICI with incidental findings of LVV on FDG-PET, reviewing their clinical course and radiographic findings. All 4 cases had FDG-PET scans for routine oncology indications and had no associated clinical features of LVV. One patient was treated with corticosteroids and no patients developed any clinical evidence of vasculitis during a mean follow-up period of 17 months (range: 7-33 mo). All FDG-PET images reporting LVV underwent a standardized analysis to identify any technical issues or concerns with interpretation. In review of imaging, 3 of the cases may have been due to delayed tracer to scan interval leading to misinterpretation of vascular uptake as suspected LVV. Recognition of technical pitfalls in FDG-PET interpretation is crucial to inform the need for immunosuppression and the safety of continued ICI therapy.

3.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am ; 50(2): 181-199, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670720

RESUMO

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have greatly improved survival of several cancers with historically very poor prognosis. ICIs act by stimulating the patient's own immune system to fight cancer. Simultaneously, this immune activation can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including rheumatic manifestations (Rh-irAEs). Rh-irAEs mimic primary rheumatic diseases including arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, myositis, vasculitis, sarcoidosis, and sicca. This article summarizes the latest evidence regarding the utility of laboratory investigations in Rh-irAEs.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Doenças Reumáticas , Humanos , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Reumáticas/imunologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/imunologia , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico
4.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am ; 50(2): 301-312, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670728

RESUMO

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment through blocking immunoregulatory pathways, resulting in augmented antitumor responses. However, ICIs can cause inflammatory autoimmune toxicities, known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Common rheumatic irAEs include inflammatory arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica-like symptoms, and myositis. Fewer cases of de novo connective tissue disease as irAEs have been described and have mainly presented with cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). Treatments include glucocorticoids and steroid-sparing agents such as hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methotrexate with improvement of symptoms. In this review, the authors discuss immune-related SLE and SSc and their management.


Assuntos
Doenças do Tecido Conjuntivo , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Doenças do Tecido Conjuntivo/imunologia , Escleroderma Sistêmico/imunologia , Escleroderma Sistêmico/induzido quimicamente , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/imunologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/induzido quimicamente , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico
5.
J Rheumatol ; 51(5): 523-528, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428960

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema (RS3PE) is characterized by symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema and negative rheumatoid factor (RF). It has been described in a setting of malignancy, suggesting a paraneoplastic association. With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of cancers and emergence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), our objective was to identify and describe cases of ICI-associated RS3PE (ICI-RS3PE) and compare them to non-ICI-RS3PE. METHODS: The Canadian Research Group of Rheumatology in Immuno-Oncology (CanRIO) network is a collaboration of Canadian rheumatologists with experience in the management of patients with rheumatic irAEs (Rh-irAEs). Standardized data on adult patients with Rh-irAE have been collected as part of retrospective and prospective cohorts. In this study, detailed information on all cases of ICI-RS3PE from both cohorts were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 11 cases of ICI-RS3PE. The most frequently observed malignancy was nonsmall cell lung cancer (4 of 11), followed by malignant melanoma (2 of 11) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (2 of 11). The median time to onset of ICI-RS3PE was 26 weeks from ICI start and 52 weeks from diagnosis of malignancy. Seven patients had stable cancer prior to onset of ICI-RS3PE, 3 had partial response, and 1 had complete response. All patients received glucocorticoids. Conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) were needed in 10 patients. CONCLUSION: ICI-RS3PE may be an independent Rh-irAE, separate from paraneoplastic RS3PE. The symptoms of ICI-RS3PE responded well to glucocorticoids, but concomitant treatment with csDMARDs may be necessary.


Assuntos
Edema , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Sinovite , Humanos , Sinovite/tratamento farmacológico , Sinovite/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Edema/tratamento farmacológico , Edema/induzido quimicamente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Canadá , Adulto , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Fator Reumatoide/sangue
7.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 58: 152110, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36372016

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), increasingly used cancer therapeutics, can cause off-target inflammatory effects called immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including ICI-induced inflammatory arthritis (ICI-induced IA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (ICI-induced PMR). There are no validated classification criteria or outcome measures for these conditions, and adaptation of treatment recommendations from corresponding rheumatic diseases may not be appropriate. We summarized clinical descriptors of ICI-induced IA and ICI-induced PMR and aggregated domains used for these conditions in order to inform the development of a core set of outcome domains. METHODS: As the initial step of the core domain set generation process, we systemically searched Medline (Pubmed), EMBASE, Cochrane, and CINHL through March 2021 to identify all studies that provide both clinical descriptions and domains relevant to ICI-induced IA and ICI-induced PMR. Domains were mapped to core areas, such as pathophysiological manifestations, life impact, resource use, and longevity/survival, as suggested by the OMERACT 2.1 Filter. RESULTS: We identified 69 publications, over a third of which utilized non-specific diagnoses of "arthritis," "arthralgia," and/or "PMR". Other publications provided the number, the distribution and/or names of specific joints affected, while others labeled the irAE as the corresponding rheumatic disease, such as rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis. Most distinct domains mapped to the pathophysiology/manifestations core area (24 domains), such as signs/symptoms (13 domains), labs (6 domains), and imaging (5 domains), with harm domains of adverse effects from irAE treatment and fear of irAE treatment decreasing ICI efficacy. Forty-three publications also referenced irAE treatment and 35 subsequent response, as well as 32 tumor response. CONCLUSION: There is considerable heterogeneity in the domains used to clinically characterize ICI-induced IA and ICI-induced PMR. There were several domains mapped to the pathophysiologic manifestations core area, although several publications highlighted domains evenly distributed among the other core areas of life impact, longevity/survival and resource use.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Arterite de Células Gigantes , Neoplasias , Polimialgia Reumática , Doenças Reumáticas , Humanos , Polimialgia Reumática/induzido quimicamente , Polimialgia Reumática/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Arterite de Células Gigantes/tratamento farmacológico
8.
J Rheumatol ; 49(10): 1092-1099, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35840155

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To provide the initial installment of a living guideline that will provide up-to-date guidance on the pharmacological management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Canada. METHODS: The Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRA) formed a multidisciplinary panel composed of rheumatologists, researchers, methodologists, and patients. In this first installment of our living guideline, the panel developed a recommendation for the tapering of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/ts DMARD) therapy in patients in sustained remission using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach, including a health equity framework developed for the Canadian RA population. The recommendation was adapted from a living guideline of the Australia & New Zealand Musculoskeletal Clinical Trials Network. RESULTS: In people with RA who are in sustained low disease activity or remission for at least 6 months, we suggest offering stepwise reduction in the dose of b/tsDMARD without discontinuation, in the context of a shared decision, provided patients are able to rapidly access rheumatology care and reestablish their medications if needed. In patients where rapid access to care or reestablishing access to medications is challenging, we conditionally recommend against tapering. A patient decision aid was developed to complement the recommendation. CONCLUSION: This living guideline will provide contemporary RA management recommendations for Canadian practice. New recommendations will be added over time and updated, with the latest recommendation, evidence summaries, and Evidence to Decision summaries available through the CRA website (www.rheum.ca).


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Produtos Biológicos , Reumatologia , Humanos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Canadá , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico
9.
BMC Urol ; 22(1): 35, 2022 Mar 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35277143

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a systemic lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by elevated serum IgG4 levels and tumefactive lesions that can involve nearly every organ system. Involvement of the prostate is rare but has been reported in limited cases. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old man of Asian descent with a history of sinusitis and priapism presented to hospital with rigors and voiding symptoms. He was diagnosed with IgG4-RD one month prior to presentation, following pathological analysis of a submandibular mass that demonstrated chronic sclerosing sialadenitis. On presentation, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and prostate serum antigen levels were all within normal limits. Examination was notable for a large, firm prostate, and a foley catheter was inserted. Contrast CT of the abdomen was unremarkable. Further workup revealed elevated serum IgG4 levels (9.22 g/L) and he was subsequently started on prednisone 35 mg daily. Imaging to screen for systemic IgG4-RD involvement demonstrated paravertebral soft tissue involvement and he was given rituximab 1000 mg IV × 2 doses. MRI revealed diffuse prostatitis. Five days after starting prednisone and one day after his first dose of rituximab, he successfully passed trial of void and was discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: IgG4-related prostatitis is a rare and underrecognized manifestation of IgG4-RD. Our case highlights the need to consider IgG4-related prostatitis as an etiology of urinary obstruction in young individuals. Resolution of symptoms following treatment with steroids may be diagnostic of IgG4-related prostatitis, and may potentially avoid the need for invasive diagnostic procedures such as prostate biopsy.


Assuntos
Imunoglobulina G , Prostatite/complicações , Prostatite/diagnóstico , Transtornos Urinários/etiologia , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Masculino , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Priapismo/etiologia , Prostatite/tratamento farmacológico , Prostatite/imunologia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Urinários/tratamento farmacológico , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêutico
10.
Lancet Reg Health Am ; 11: 100228, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35345649

RESUMO

Background: Interleukin-6 inhibitors reduce mortality in severe COVID-19. British Columbia began using tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (maximum 800 mg) in January 2021 in critically ill patients with COVID-19, but due to drug shortages, decreased dosing to 400 mg IV fixed dose in April 2021. The aims of this study were twofold: to compare physiological responses and clinical outcomes of these two strategies, and examine the cost-effectiveness of treating all patients with 400 mg versus half the patients with 8 mg/kg and the other half without tocilizumab. Methods: This was a single-centre, before-after cohort study of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with tocilizumab, and a control cohort treated with dexamethasone only. Physiological responses and clinical outcomes were compared between patients receiving both doses of tocilizumab and those receiving dexamethasone only. We built a decision tree model to examine cost-effectiveness. Findings: 152 patients were included; 40 received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg, 59 received 400 mg and 53 received dexamethasone only. Median CRP fell from 103 mg/L to 5.2 mg/L, 96 mg/L to 6.8 mg/L and from 81.3 mg/L to 48 mg/L in the 8 mg/kg, 400 mg tocilizumab, and dexamethasone only groups, respectively. 28-day mortality was 5% (n=2) vs 8% (n=5) vs 13% (n=7), with no significant difference in all pair-wise comparison. At an assumed willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 Canadian per life-year, utilizing 400 mg for all patients rather than 8 mg/kg for half the patients is cost-effective in 51.6% of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations. Interpretation: Both doses of tocilizumab demonstrated comparable reduction of inflammation with similar 28-day mortality. Without consideration of equity, the net monetary benefits of providing 400 mg tocilizumab to all patients are comparable to 8 mg/kg to half the patients. In the context of ongoing drug shortages, fixed-dose 400 mg tocilizumab may be a practical, feasible and economical option. Funding: This work was supported by a gift donation from Hsu & Taylor Family to the VGH Foundation, and the Yale Bernard G. Forget Scholarship.

11.
Can Med Educ J ; 12(2): e63-e68, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33995721

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are regional disparities in the distribution of Canadian rheumatologists. The objective of this study was to identify factors impacting rheumatology residents' postgraduate practice decisions to inform Canadian Rheumatology Association workforce recommendations. METHODS: An online survey was developed, and invitations were sent to all current Canadian rheumatology residents in 2019 (n = 67). Differences between subgroups of respondents were examined using the Pearson χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 34 of 67 residents completed the survey. Seventy-three percent of residents planned to practice in the same province as their rheumatology training. The majority of residents (80%) ranked proximity to friends and family as the most important factor in planning. Half of participants had exposure to alternative modes of care delivery (e.g. telehealth) during their rheumatology training with fifteen completing a community rheumatology elective (44%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of rheumatology residents report plans to practice in the same province as they trained, and close to home. Gaps in training include limited exposure to community electives in smaller centers, and training in telehealth and travelling clinics for underserviced populations. Our findings highlight the need for strategies to increase exposure of rheumatology trainees to underserved areas to help address the maldistribution of rheumatologists.


CONTEXTE: Au Canada, il existe des disparités régionales dans la répartition des rhumatologues. La présente étude recense les facteurs qui influencent les choix des résidents en rhumatologie concernant leur lieu d'exercice futur afin de guider les recommandations de Société canadienne de rhumatologie relatives aux effectifs. MÉTHODES: Après l'élaboration d'un sondage en ligne, une invitation a été envoyée à tous les résidents en rhumatologie au Canada en 2019 (n = 67). Les différences entre les groupes ont été examinées à l'aide du test Pearson χ2. RÉSULTATS: Trente-quatre des 67 résidents contactés ont répondu au sondage. Soixante-treize pour cent des répondants prévoyaient d'exercer dans la province où ils avaient fait leur formation en rhumatologie. La majorité des résidents (80 %) ont classé la proximité des amis et de la famille comme le facteur le plus important dans leur choix de lieu d'exercice. La moitié des participants s'étaient familiarisés avec d'autres modes de prestation de soins (par exemple, la télésanté) pendant leur formation en rhumatologie et 15 d'entre eux (44 %) avaient fait un stage en rhumatologie communautaire. CONCLUSIONS: La majorité des résidents en rhumatologie déclarent avoir l'intention d'exercer près de chez eux, dans la province où ils ont fait leurs études. Les lacunes dans la formation comportent l'exposition limitée à des stages dans les petits centres en milieu communautaire, en télésanté et dans les cliniques mobiles ciblant les populations mal desservies. Nos conclusions soulignent le besoin de stratégies visant à augmenter l'exposition des résidents en rhumatologie à des zones mal desservies afin de remédier à la mauvaise répartition géographique des rhumatologues.

12.
Cell Rep Med ; 2(5): 100269, 2021 05 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33899032

RESUMO

Data suggest that interleukin (IL)-6 blockade could reduce mortality in severe COVID-19, yet IL-6 is only modestly elevated in most patients. Chen et al. describe the role of soluble interleukin-6 receptor (sIL-6R) in IL-6 trans-signaling and how understanding the IL-6:sIL-6R axis might help define and treat COVID-19 cytokine storm syndrome.


Assuntos
COVID-19/patologia , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina/diagnóstico , Receptores de Interleucina-6/análise , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacologia , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/virologia , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina/etiologia , Humanos , Interleucina-6/análise , Interleucina-6/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos
13.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 70(8): 2197-2207, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33471137

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases (PAD). METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with PAD referred for rheumatologic evaluation prior to starting or during immunotherapy between January 2013 and July 2019 from 10 academic sites across Canada. Data were extracted by chart review using a standardized form. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with PAD on ICI therapy were identified. The most common PADs were rheumatoid arthritis (30%), psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (30%), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD, 15%) and axial spondyloarthritis (11%), and the most frequently observed cancers were lung cancer and melanoma. All patients received anti-PD-1 therapies, and 2 received additional sequential anti-CTLA-4 therapy. PAD exacerbations occurred in 52% over a median (IQR) follow-up of 11.0 (6.0-17.5) months, with 14% being severe, 57% requiring corticosteroids, 50% requiring immunosuppression and 14% requiring ICI discontinuation. Flares were generally more frequent and severe in patients who previously required more intensive immunosuppression (i.e., biologics). Flares occurred despite background immunosuppression at the time of ICI initiation. In patients with preexisting psoriasis, IBD and axial spondyloarthritis, rheumatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs), mostly polyarthritis and tenosynovitis, were frequently observed. Tumor progression was not associated with exposure to immunosuppressive drugs before or after ICI initiation and was numerically less frequent in patients with irAEs. CONCLUSION: PAD exacerbations in the context of ICI treatment are common, although generally mild, and occur despite background immunosuppression. Exacerbations are more frequent and severe in patients on more intensive immunosuppressive therapies pre-immunotherapy.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Doenças Autoimunes/imunologia , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/imunologia , Melanoma/imunologia , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/imunologia , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/imunologia , Masculino , Oncologia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reumatologia/métodos
14.
Blood Rev ; 45: 100707, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32425294

RESUMO

A subset of patients with severe COVID-19 develop profound inflammation and multi-organ dysfunction consistent with a "Cytokine Storm Syndrome" (CSS). In this review we compare the clinical features, diagnosis, and pathogenesis of COVID-CSS with other hematological CSS, namely secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH), idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD), and CAR-T cell therapy associated Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS). Novel therapeutics targeting cytokines or inhibiting cell signaling pathways have now become the mainstay of treatment in these CSS. We review the evidence for cytokine blockade and attenuation in these known CSS as well as the emerging literature and clinical trials pertaining to COVID-CSS. Established markers of inflammation as well as cytokine levels are compared and contrasted between these four entities in order to establish a foundation for future diagnostic criteria of COVID-CSS.


Assuntos
COVID-19/imunologia , Hiperplasia do Linfonodo Gigante/imunologia , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina/imunologia , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Linfo-Histiocitose Hemofagocítica/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores/sangue , Proteína C-Reativa/imunologia , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , COVID-19/patologia , COVID-19/virologia , Hiperplasia do Linfonodo Gigante/tratamento farmacológico , Hiperplasia do Linfonodo Gigante/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina/patologia , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina/virologia , Ferritinas/sangue , Ferritinas/imunologia , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Interleucina-1/antagonistas & inibidores , Interleucina-1/sangue , Interleucina-1/imunologia , Interleucina-6/antagonistas & inibidores , Interleucina-6/sangue , Interleucina-6/imunologia , Linfo-Histiocitose Hemofagocítica/tratamento farmacológico , Linfo-Histiocitose Hemofagocítica/patologia , Transdução de Sinais , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19
15.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 80(1): 36-48, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32327425

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic and musculoskeletal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are observed in about 10% of patients with cancer receiving checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Given the recent emergence of these events and the lack of guidance for rheumatologists addressing them, a European League Against Rheumatism task force was convened to harmonise expert opinion regarding their identification and management. METHODS: First, the group formulated research questions for a systematic literature review. Then, based on literature and using a consensus procedure, 4 overarching principles and 10 points to consider were developed. RESULTS: The overarching principles defined the role of rheumatologists in the management of irAEs, highlighting the shared decision-making process between patients, oncologists and rheumatologists. The points to consider inform rheumatologists on the wide spectrum of musculoskeletal irAEs, not fulfilling usual classification criteria of rheumatic diseases, and their differential diagnoses. Early referral and facilitated access to rheumatologist are recommended, to document the target organ inflammation. Regarding therapeutic, three treatment escalations were defined: (1) local/systemic glucocorticoids if symptoms are not controlled by symptomatic treatment, then tapered to the lowest efficient dose, (2) conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, in case of inadequate response to glucocorticoids or for steroid sparing and (3) biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, for severe or refractory irAEs. A warning has been made on severe myositis, a life-threatening situation, requiring high dose of glucocorticoids and close monitoring. For patients with pre-existing rheumatic disease, baseline immunosuppressive regimen should be kept at the lowest efficient dose before starting immunotherapies. CONCLUSION: These statements provide guidance on diagnosis and management of rheumatic irAEs and aim to support future international collaborations.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Reumáticas/terapia , Comitês Consultivos , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Artralgia/induzido quimicamente , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/imunologia , Artralgia/terapia , Artrite Psoriásica/induzido quimicamente , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Artrite Psoriásica/imunologia , Artrite Psoriásica/terapia , Artrite Reativa/induzido quimicamente , Artrite Reativa/diagnóstico , Artrite Reativa/imunologia , Artrite Reativa/terapia , Autoanticorpos/imunologia , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Desprescrições , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Oncologia , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Mialgia/induzido quimicamente , Mialgia/diagnóstico , Mialgia/imunologia , Mialgia/terapia , Miocardite/induzido quimicamente , Miocardite/diagnóstico , Miocardite/imunologia , Miocardite/terapia , Miosite/induzido quimicamente , Miosite/diagnóstico , Miosite/imunologia , Miosite/terapia , Troca Plasmática , Polimialgia Reumática/induzido quimicamente , Polimialgia Reumática/diagnóstico , Polimialgia Reumática/imunologia , Polimialgia Reumática/terapia , Doenças Reumáticas/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Doenças Reumáticas/imunologia , Reumatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sociedades Médicas , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico
16.
Autoimmun Rev ; 19(8): 102595, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32535092

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer therapy, their use is associated with immune toxicities referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAE). Here we describe the clinical presentation and management of rheumatic immune-related adverse events (Rh-irAE) in a national multi-center cohort. METHODS: All patients presenting with Rh-irAE at 9 academic sites across Canada between January 2013 and January 2019 were identified and included in this retrospective cohort study. Standardized data were extracted by chart review. RESULTS: 117 patients who developed 136 Rh-irAE were identified. The most frequent Rh-irAE was symmetric polyarthritis (n = 45). Other Rh-irAE included non-inflammatory musculoskeletal symptoms (n = 18), polymyalgia rheumatica (n = 17) and myositis (n = 9). Prednisone was the most commonly used treatment (n = 76) with a mean maximum dose of 60 ± 74 mg/d and duration of treatment of 8.4 ± 11 months. Forty-two patients required conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) and two required biologic DMARD to control the Rh-irAE. ICI was discontinued due to the Rh-irAE in 22 patients. There were no deaths related to Rh-irAE. Treatment of the Rh-irAE did not appear to negatively impact the tumor response to immunotherapy with 23 patients experiencing tumor progression prior to treatment of the Rh-irAE and 13 following treatment. CONCLUSION: In this largest multi-center cohort of Rh-irAE described to date, symmetric polyarthritis was the most common Rh-irAE. There was considerable heterogeneity of treatment, although this did not appear to negatively impact the anti-tumor response. This study can inform the development of evidence-based recommendations to optimize Rh-irAE and cancer outcomes in patients treated with ICI.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Canadá , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças Reumáticas/induzido quimicamente
17.
J Rheumatol ; 47(2): 166-175, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31308203

RESUMO

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer therapy by blocking inhibitory pathways of the immune system to fight cancer cells. Their use is often limited by the development of autoimmune toxicities, which can affect multiple organ systems and are referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAE). Among these are rheumatologic irAE, including inflammatory arthritis, myositis, vasculitis, and others. Rheumatologic irAE seem to be different from irAE in other organs and from traditional autoimmune diseases in that they can occur early or have delayed onset, and can persist chronically, even after cancer therapy is terminated. Because immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly used for many types of cancer, it is important for oncologists and rheumatologists to recognize and manage toxicities early. In this review, we discuss currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors and their mechanisms of action and systemic toxicities, with a focus on the management and effect on further cancer therapy of rheumatic irAE.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Reumatologistas/psicologia , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite/etiologia , Doenças Autoimunes/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Autoimunes/etiologia , Humanos , Miosite/tratamento farmacológico , Miosite/etiologia , Oncologistas/psicologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vasculite/tratamento farmacológico , Vasculite/etiologia
18.
BMC Med Educ ; 19(1): 466, 2019 Dec 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31852496

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Video review processes for evaluation and coaching are often incorporated into medical education as a means to accurately capture physician-patient interactions. Compared to direct observation they offer the advantage of overcoming many logistical challenges. However, the suitability and viability of using video-based peer consultations for professional development requires further investigation. This study aims to explore the acceptability and feasibility of video-based peer feedback to support professional development and quality improvement in patient care. METHODS: Five rheumatologists each provided four videos of patient consultations. Peers evaluated the videos using five-point scales, providing annotations in the video recordings, and offering recommendations. The rheumatologists reviewed the videos of their own four patient interactions along with the feedback. They were asked to document if they would make practice changes based on the feedback. Focus groups were conducted and analysed to explore the effectiveness of video-based peer feedback in assisting physicians to improve clinical practice. RESULTS: Participants felt the video-based feedback provided accurate and detailed information in a more convenient, less intrusive manner than direct observation. Observations made through video review enabled participants to evaluate more detailed information than a chart review alone. Participants believed that reviewing recorded consultations allowed them to reflect on their practice and gain insight into alternative communication methods. CONCLUSIONS: Video-based peer feedback and self-review of clinical performance is an acceptable and pragmatic approach to support professional development and improve clinical care among peer clinicians. Further investigation into the effectiveness of this approach is needed.


Assuntos
Feedback Formativo , Grupo Associado , Gravação em Vídeo , Competência Clínica , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Reumatologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
19.
ACR Open Rheumatol ; 1(2): 73-82, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31777783

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This post hoc analysis evaluated tofacitinib persistence in patients with RA in long-term extension (LTE) studies up to 9.5 years. METHODS: Data were pooled from two LTE studies: ORAL Sequel (NCT00413699) and Study A3921041 (NCT00661661). Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), as monotherapy or with background conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Kaplan-Meier estimates for tofacitinib drug survival and reasons for discontinuation were evaluated. Baseline factors were analyzed as predictors of persistence. RESULTS: In 4967 tofacitinib-treated patients entering LTE studies, mean (maximum) treatment duration was 3.5 (9.4) years. Median drug survival (95% confidence interval) was 4.9 (4.7, 5.1) years. Estimated 2- and 5-year drug survival rates were 75.5% and 49.4%, respectively. Median drug survival was similar between the tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID groups, and slightly higher for patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy versus combination therapy. Overall, 50.7% of patients discontinued tofacitinib; of these, 47.2% were due to adverse events and 7.1% for lack/loss of efficacy. An increased risk of discontinuation was associated with baseline diabetes, hypertension, negative anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP), negative rheumatoid factor (RF), and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR). CONCLUSION: Median drug survival of tofacitinib-treated patients participating in LTE studies was approximately 5 years and was similar for tofacitinib dosed at 5 and 10 mg BID. Reduced drug survival was associated with negative anti-CCP/RF status, TNFi-IR, and certain comorbidities. These data support tofacitinib use for long-term management of RA.

20.
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol ; 2(4): 149-152, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31616855

RESUMO

The use of immunosuppressive therapies for immune-mediated disease (IMD) is associated with an elevated risk of infections and related comorbidities. While many infectious diseases can generally be prevented by vaccines, immunization rates in this specific patient population remain suboptimal, due in part to uncertainty about their efficacy or safety under these clinical situations. To address this concern, a multidisciplinary group of Canadian physicians with expertise in dermatology, gastroenterology, infectious diseases and rheumatology developed evidence-based clinical guidelines on vaccinations featuring 13 statements that are aimed at reducing the risk of preventable infections in individuals exposed to immunosuppressive agents.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...