Use of Indicator Dilution Principle to Evaluate Accuracy of Arterial Input Function Measured With Low-Dose Ultrafast Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.

Accurately measuring arterial input function (AIF) is essential for quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We used the indicator dilution principle to evaluate the accuracy of AIF measured directly from an artery following a low-dose contrast media ultrafast DCE-MRI. In total, 15 patients with biopsy-confirmed localized prostate cancers were recruited. Cardiac MRI (CMRI) and ultrafast DCE-MRI were acquired on a Philips 3 T Ingenia scanner. The AIF was measured at iliac arties following injection of a low-dose (0.015 mmol/kg) gadolinium (Gd) contrast media. The cardiac output (CO) from CMRI (COCMRI) was calculated from the difference in ventricular volume at diastole and systole measured on the short axis of heart. The CO from DCE-MRI (CODCE) was also calculated from the AIF and dose of the contrast media used. A correlation test and Bland-Altman plot were used to compare COCMRI and CODCE. The average (±standard deviation [SD]) area under the curve measured directly from local AIF was 0.219 ± 0.07 mM·min. The average (±SD) COCMRI and CODCE were 6.52 ± 1.47 L/min and 6.88 ± 1.64 L/min, respectively. There was a strong positive correlation (r = 0.82, P < .01) and good agreement between COCMRI and CODCE. The CODCE is consistent with the reference standard COCMRI. This indicates that the AIF can be measured accurately from an artery with ultrafast DCE-MRI following injection of a low-dose contrast media.

Automated frame-by-frame endocardial border detection from cardiac magnetic resonance images for quantitative assessment of left ventricular function: validation and clinical feasibility.

PURPOSE: To develop a technique based on image noise distribution for automated endocardial border detection from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images throughout the cardiac cycle, validate it, and test its clinical utility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images obtained in 36 patients were analyzed using custom software to obtain left ventricular (LV) volume throughout the cardiac cycle, end-systolic and end-diastolic LV volumes, and ejection fraction (EF). Validation against manually-traced endocardial boundaries included intertechnique comparisons of LV volumes, slice areas, and border positions. Then, the clinical feasibility of the dynamic automated analysis of LV function was tested in 14 patients with normal LV function, 12 patients with systolic dysfunction, and 10 patients with diastolic dysfunction. RESULTS: Analysis time for one cardiac cycle was <15 minutes. Intertechnique comparisons resulted in high correlation (r>0.96), small biases (volumes: -6 mL; EF: 4.6%) and narrow limits of agreement (volumes: 17.6 mL; EF: 9.2%). We found significant intergroup differences in multiple quantitative indices of systolic and diastolic function. CONCLUSION: Fast, automated, dynamic detection of LV endocardial boundaries is feasible and allows accurate quantification of LV size and function, which is potentially clinically useful for objective assessment of systolic and diastolic dysfunction.