Nonunion following valgus subtrochanteric osteotomy for neglected femoral neck fracture: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Femoral neck fractures account for roughly half of the two million hip fractures that occur each year worldwide. There is a high rate of neglected cases and potential complications such as nonunion or avascular necrosis (AVN) in developing countries. More than 30 % of patients may experience non-union following a femoral fracture. There is no consensus on the best neglected femoral neck fracture treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old female known case of rheumatoid arthritis came with a neglected femoral neck fracture to our center. We salvaged the viable hip by subtrochanteric valgus osteotomy and fixation by angled blade plate (ABP). After eight months, she returned with left hip pain and nonunion of the fracture and osteotomy sites. We refixed the fracture with a longer ABP together with autografting of both sites. After two years, she had complete union, full hip range of motion, and painless ambulation. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Subtrochanteric valgus osteotomy is susceptible to nonunion especially in patients with medical comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Careful selection of osteotomy site and appropriate fixation device might prevent of non-union.

Down-regulation of microRNA-26a and up-regulation of microRNA-27a contributes to aggressive progression of human osteosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy with high local aggressiveness and rapid metastasizing potential, resulting in poor survival. Increasing reports suggest that deregulated microRNAs (miRNAs) might provide novel therapeutic targets for cancers. However, the expression of miR-26a and miR-27a in osteosarcoma need further investigation in clinical samples. In our study, we evaluate the expression of these miRNAs in osteosarcoma tissues and compared with paired adjacent non-tumor bone tissues using RT-qPCR. METHODS: Total RNA was purified from patients with osteosarcoma and noncancerous bone tissues. Real-time PCR was applied to quantify the expression level of miR-26a and miR-27a. Moreover, the correlation of these markers with clinicopathological characteristics was also evaluated in osteosarcoma patients. A cox proportional hazards model was performed to assess multivariate analyses of prognostic values. RESULTS: Our result suggested that miR-26aexpression level in osteosarcoma bone tissue was significantly lower than that in the paired noncancerous bone tissues. MiR-27a expression was higher in osteosarcoma bone tissue in comparison with paired noncancerous bone tissues. The results indicated that low expression level of miR-26a and high expression of miR-27a were associated with high TNM stage (P = 0.001; P = 0.012), tumor grade (P = 0.007; P = 0.016), and distant metastasis (P = 0.004; P = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test indicated that patients with low expression of miR-26a and high expression of miR-27a had shorter overall survival (log-rank test: P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that low expression of miR-26a and high expression of miR-27a (P = 0.021; P = 0.011), high TNM stage (P = 0.001; P = 0.003), tumor grade (P = 0.005; P = 0.01), and distant metastasis.(P = 0.002; P = 0.005) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival patients with osteosarcoma cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our findings suggested that expression level of miR-26a and miR-27a contributes to aggressive progression of this malignancy. Therefore, may have clinical potentials as a non-invasive diagnostic/prognostic biomarker for osteosarcoma patients.