Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients.

Standard blood laboratory parameters may have diagnostic potential, if polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) tests are not available on time. We evaluated standard blood laboratory parameters of 655 COVID-19 patients suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, who underwent PCR testing in one of five hospitals in Vienna, Austria. We compared laboratory parameters, clinical characteristics, and outcomes between positive and negative PCR-tested patients and evaluated the ability of those parameters to distinguish between groups. Of the 590 patients (20-100 years, 276 females and 314 males), 208 were PCR-positive. Positive compared to negative PCR-tested patients had significantly lower levels of leukocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocytes, and thrombocytes; while significantly higher levels were detected with erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, C-reactive-protein, ferritin, activated-partial-thromboplastin-time, alanine-aminotransferase, aspartate-aminotransferase, lipase, creatine-kinase, and lactate-dehydrogenase. From all blood parameters, eosinophils, ferritin, leukocytes, and erythrocytes showed the highest ability to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative patients (area-under-curve, AUC: 72.3-79.4%). The AUC of our model was 0.915 (95% confidence intervals, 0.876-0.955). Leukopenia, eosinopenia, elevated erythrocytes, and hemoglobin were among the strongest markers regarding accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and post-test probabilities. Our findings suggest that especially leukopenia, eosinopenia, and elevated hemoglobin are helpful to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative tested patients.

Hospital antibiotic management in Austria--results of the ABS maturity survey of the ABS International group.

BACKGROUND: The ABS International group conducted a survey to estimate the prevalence and characteristics of country-specific hospital antibiotic management programs. This paper summarizes the results for Austria. METHODS: The survey was conducted in April and May 2007. A questionnaire with various items related to hospital antibiotic management was sent to 160 Austrian hospitals. MAIN FINDINGS: Of 160 questionnaires sent, 80 were returned and evaluable. The mean total score for all items and all hospitals was 3.29 (median: 3.42; range 1.35-4.74). The larger the hospital the higher were the reported scores concerning diagnostics, antibiotic-related organization and antibiotic-consumption control, but the lower the scores for antibiotic-related personnel development and antibiotic-related relationships to relevant environments. The maturity figure for large hospitals (>500 beds) was 3.57, for medium hospitals 3.34, and for small hospitals (<200 beds) 3.01. CONCLUSIONS: The self-reported results of our questionnaire-based survey clearly show that there is still need for improvement. In all five categories surveyed, Austrian hospitals scored their antibiotic maturity lower than the international averages. The establishment of an antibiotic officer enables the development of antibiotic stewardship tools such as antibiotic lists. Such tools can be seen as quality indicators.

Spontaneous viral clearance in patients with acute hepatitis C can be predicted by repeated measurements of serum viral load.

Early interferon (IFN) therapy prevents viral persistence in acute hepatitis C, but in view of the resulting costs and morbidity patients who really need therapy have to be identified. Twelve consecutive patients with acute hepatitis C (9 women, 3 men, mean age: 39.5 +/- 18.8 y, genotype 1: 7, genotype 3a: 3, 2 could not be genotyped) were studied. The sources of infection were medical procedures in 6, sexual transmission in 3, and intravenous drug abuse in 3 patients. Viral load was measured by Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor v2.0 (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, NY). The time from infection to clinical symptoms was 43.3 +/- 8.6 (mean +/- SD) days. Eight patients cleared hepatitis C virus (HCV) spontaneously and remained HCV-RNA negative with a follow-up of 9.0 +/- 3.9 months. In these patients viral load declined fast and continuously. The time from exposure to HCV-RNA negativity was 77.4 +/- 25.3 and from the first symptoms was 34.7 +/- 22.1 days. In 4 patients HCV-RNA levels remained high or even increased. Two of them became sustained responders to treatment initiated after a 6-week observation period. The 2 remaining patients were not treated (one because of contraindications for IFN, the other declined therapy) and are still HCV-RNA positive. In conclusion, patients with acute icteric hepatitis C have a high rate of spontaneous viral clearance within the first month after the onset of symptoms. IFN therapy appears only needed in patients who fail to clear the virus within 35 days after onset of symptoms. By this approach, IFN therapy was not necessary in two thirds of patients with acute hepatitis C.

Effect of high dose folic acid therapy on hyperhomocysteinemia in hemodialysis patients: results of the Vienna multicenter study.

Homocysteine is associated with atherosclerosis and enhanced cardiovascular risk. In previous studies, treatment with folic acid up to 15 mg/d failed to correct hyperhomocysteinemia in the majority of end-stage renal disease patients. A dose of 30 or 60 mg of folic acid per day was compared with 15 mg/d in an attempt to normalize hyperhomocysteinemia in 150 hemodialysis patients. In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, 144 patients completed the 4-wk treatment period and 121 patients completed the 6-mo follow-up. Total homocysteine plasma levels were reduced by 32.1% (15 mg/d), 29. 9% (30 mg/d), or 37.8% (60 mg/d) with no significant differences found between the three treatment groups. Baseline total homocysteine plasma concentration was an independent predictor of the response to folic acid therapy (P = 0.0001), whereas the 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms (MTHFR 677C --> T and 1298A --> C) had no influence. Nevertheless, patients with the MTHFR 677TT genotype more frequently attained normal total homocysteine plasma levels than patients with the CC or CT genotype (P = 0.025). In response to 60 mg of folic acid per day, TT genotype patients had lower folate plasma levels compared to CC or CT genotype patients (P = 0.016). After completion of the 4-wk treatment period with 30 or 60 mg of folic acid per day, there was a marked rebound of total homocysteine plasma levels at the end of the follow-up in patients with the MTHFR 677TT genotype, which even exceeded baseline values in several patients (P = 0.0001). This study clearly demonstrates that doses of 30 or 60 mg of folic acid per day are not more effective than 15 mg/d in reducing hyperhomocysteinemia in regular hemodialysis patients. Patients with the MTHFR 677TT genotype are more likely to realize normal total homocysteine plasma levels. Folic acid at 30 or 60 mg/d but not 15 mg/d results in a rebound of total homocysteine plasma concentrations when treatment is stopped.