Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Indian J Nephrol ; 20(3): 152-5, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21072156

RESUMO

Renal vein thrombosis (RVT) is a rare event but is prevalent in patients with nephrotic syndrome. Bilateral RVT is even rarer. The literature is relatively sparse in terms of the management of RVT because of its rarity and consists of a few case reports and case series. We present a case with bilateral RVT complicated by a pulmonary embolism in a patient with membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN). A 19-year-old female presented with acute flank pain and worsening renal function after a couple of weeks in hospital while being treated with diuretics for anasarca secondary to MGN. Venography was used for diagnosis. The patient underwent percutaneous catheter thrombectomy and localized thrombolysis achieving resolution of pain and improvement of renal function. The patient was then anticoagulated for life with warfarin.

2.
Can J Cardiol ; 25(11): e382-4, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19898701

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), when performed by an experienced operator immediately after admission in a high-volume tertiary care centre, results in lower in-hospital mortality, and decreased risk of reinfarction and stroke. Furthermore, for those communities without a PCI centre, transport of patients to a PCI centre within 90 min is superior to thrombolysis. Chilliwack General Hospital (CGH, Chilliwack, British Columbia) has a unique situation - the travel time to the nearest coronary catheterization centre (Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, British Columbia) is between 60 min and 120 min. OBJECTIVES: To compare access to and use of thrombolysis versus PCI in individuals with ST elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) at CGH. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who presented to the emergency department at CGH with STEMIs between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2005. Of the 67 patients who had a STEMI during this time period, 40 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom, 32 received thrombolytics and eight received PCI. RESULTS: The average door-to-thrombolysis time was 46 min (95% CI 32 min to 60 min). A door-to-thrombolysis time of less then 30 min was achieved in 15 of 32 patients (47%). The average door-to-balloon time was 186 min (95% CI 166 min to 206 min). A door-to-balloon time of less than 90 min was not achieved in any of the eight patients who received PCI. CONCLUSIONS: CGH did not meet the American Heart Association guidelines for a door-to-balloon time of less than 90 min.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/métodos , Eletrocardiografia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colúmbia Britânica , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalos de Confiança , Emergências , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Hospitais Gerais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Probabilidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...