Effects of food and race on the pharmacokinetics of lazertinib in healthy subjects and patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Lazertinib is a potent, irreversible, brain-penetrant, mutant-selective, and wild type-sparing third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study aimed to evaluate the effects of food and race on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lazertinib from a healthy volunteer trial and PK data from NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An open-label, single-dose, two-period, single-sequence crossover study was conducted in healthy subjects with two race groups (non-Asian and Asian). Subjects orally received a single dose of lazertinib 240 mg in fasted and fed state (high-fat meal) in each period separated by a 21-day washout. An open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 study was conducted in Asian and non-Asian patients with NSCLC. Patients were given oral lazertinib 20-320 mg once daily in fasted state continuously in 21-day cycles. PK parameters were evaluated using non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: A total of 24 healthy subjects (12 non-Asians and 12 Asians) and 52 NSCLC patients (22 non-Asians and 30 Asians) were evaluated. The change in the overall systemic exposure of lazertinib at fed state was less than 15%. Non-Asians showed 58-76% of the systemic exposure than Asians in healthy subjects. In contrast, there were no significant differences in systemic exposure by race both after single and multiple doses among NSCLC patients. CONCLUSION: Lazertinib can be taken with or without food considering the comparable systemic exposures related to food. Although effect of race was not consistent across studies, there was no evidence for dose adjustment based on race.

Effects of Acid-Reducing Agents on the Pharmacokinetics of Lazertinib in Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Lazertinib is an irreversible, mutant-selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Co-administration of TKIs with acid-reducing agents (ARAs) can lead to potential drug-drug interactions, which decreases solubility and absorption of TKIs and is ultimately associated with reduced efficacy of TKIs. This retrospective analysis evaluated the effect of ARAs on the pharmacokinetics of lazertinib using data obtained from patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: In a total of 234 patients with lazertinib pharmacokinetics observed at steady state, dose-normalized (DN) area under the concentration-time curve (AUCss), maximum concentration (Cmax,ss), and/or trough concentration on day 15 (CD15) were compared between a group receiving ARA concomitantly for at least 4 days (ARA group) and another group not receiving ARA (non-ARA group) in a dose-proportional range. Additionally, a comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters at a therapeutic dose of 240 mg once daily was evaluated. RESULTS: Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of ARA group to non-ARA group for DNAUCss, DNCmax,ss, and DNCD15 at 40 mg to 320 mg once daily showing the dose proportionality were 0.8743 (0.7285-1.0493), 0.9035 (0.7482-1.0910), and 0.9126 (0.7364-1.1311), respectively. GMRs with 90% CIs for AUCss, Cmax,ss, and CD15 at 240 mg were 0.9136 (0.6637-1.2576), 0.9012 (0.6703-1.2116), and 0.8850 (0.6463-1.2118), respectively. CONCLUSION: All pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different between the two groups (p values > 0.05), indicating that co-administered ARAs did not significantly affect the steady state pharmacokinetics of lazertinib. Therefore, no dose adjustment of lazertinib is required in patients receiving concomitant ARAs. GOV IDENTIFIERS: NCT03046992, NCT04075396.

A population PK-PD model of YH4808, a novel P-CAB, and intragastric pH that incorporated negative feedback by increased intragastric pH onto the systemic exposure to YH4808.

YH4808 is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that is under clinical development to treat patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcer diseases. In this study, the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of YH4808 were modeled in healthy male volunteers who received a single oral dose of YH4808 at 30, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, and 800 mg or matching placebo and multiple once-daily oral doses of YH4808 at 100, 200, and 400 mg or matching placebo for 7 days. A population PK-PD model adequately described the time-concentration-effect profiles of YH4808. The maximum increasing effect of YH4808 on intragastric pH was 4.38, which was higher than the observed maximum increase in intragastric pH after omeprazole at 40 mg (2.2 in pH). The maximum inhibitory effect by the increased intragastric pH on the exposure to repeated YH4808 was 58% from baseline. Monte-Carlo simulation experiments based on the final model showed that YH4808 at 200 mg will produce a higher percentage of time at pH > 4 over 24 h on day 1 than observed value of esomeprazole at 40 mg once-daily, an active comparator (84.7% time vs. 58.3% time, respectively). Because YH4808 at ≥200 mg resulted in a higher percentage of time at intragastric pH > 4 than seen after once-daily esomeprazole at 40 mg and YH4808 showed acceptable tolerability at a single-dose of 30-800 mg, we suggest to test the 200 mg once daily dosage regimen in further clinical trials of YH4808.

Cardiac Safety Assessment of Lazertinib: Findings From Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced NSCLC and Preclinical Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Lazertinib is a potent, irreversible, brain-penetrant, mutant-selective, and wild-type-sparing third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), creating a wide therapeutic index. Cardiovascular adverse events (AEs), including QT prolongation, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and heart failure, have emerged as potential AEs with certain EGFR TKI therapies. METHODS: Cardiac safety of lazertinib was evaluated in TKI-tolerant adults with EGFR mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC receiving lazertinib (20-320 mg/d). QT intervals corrected with Fridericia's formula (QTcF) prolongation, time-matched concentration-QTcF relationship, change of LVEF, and cardiac failure-associated AEs were evaluated. The clinical findings were supplemented by the following three preclinical studies: an in vitro hERG inhibition assay, an ex vivo isolated perfused rabbit heart study, and an in vivo telemetry-instrumented beagle dog study. RESULTS: Preclinical evaluation revealed little to no physiological effect on the basis of electrocardiogram, electrophysiological, proarrhythmic, and hemodynamic parameters. Clinical evaluation of 181 patients revealed no clinically relevant QTcF prolongation by centralized electrocardiogram in any patient and at any dose level. The predicted magnitude of QTcF value increase at maximum steady-state plasma concentration for the therapeutic dose of lazertinib (240 mg/d) was 2.2 msec (upper bound of the two-sided 90% confidence interval: 3.6 msec). No patient had clinically relevant LVEF decrease (i.e., minimum postbaseline LVEF value of <50% and a maximum decrease in LVEF value from baseline of ≥10 percentage points). Cardiac failure-associated AE occurred in one patient (grade 2 decreased LVEF) and resolved without any dose modifications. CONCLUSIONS: Our first-in-human study, together with preclinical data, indicates that lazertinib is not associated with increased cardiac risk.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of YH4808 in healthy subjects for defining an appropriate dosing regimen.

YH4808 is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker developed for gastric acid-related disorders. Previous studies indicate its potential to improve symptoms of gastric acid-related disorders. The current study was aimed to find the optimal regimen of YH4808 for night time pH control. This study was performed in two parts. Each was a randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multiple-doses, two-treatment, two-period crossover study conducted in 20 healthy Korean volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of the four groups. The three groups received different dosage regimens of YH4808 (100 mg twice a day, 200 mg once a day, or 200 mg twice a day), and the fourth group received esomeprazole 40 mg twice a day. The pharmacokinetic parameters demonstrated that the systemic exposure of YH4808 increased in a dose-proportional manner. The difference in the proportion of time above pH 4 over 24 h from the baseline was the greatest in the group receiving YH4808 200 mg twice a day. The values of the area under the effect curve at night time (12 A.M.-7 A.M.) were higher in all YH4808 groups than in the esomeprazole group. However, the differences among the YH4808 groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). YH4808 exhibited potential for better pH control during the night in comparison to esomeprazole. The optimal regimen for night time pH control among all the YH4808 regimens was 200 mg twice a day. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01761513.

Pharmacokinetics of a New, Once-Daily, Sustained-release Pregabalin Tablet in Healthy Male Volunteers.

PURPOSE: A new sustained-release (SR) pregabalin formulation (YHD1119) designed for once-daily dosing has recently been developed to improve patient adherence. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics of pregabalin SR and immediate-release (IR) formulations after multiple oral doses and to assess the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic profile of the pregabalin SR formulation after a single dose in healthy individuals. METHODS: Two clinical trials were conducted: a randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period crossover study to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetic properties of SR treatment (pregabalin SR 300 mg once daily for 3 days) and IR treatment (pregabalin IR 150 mg twice daily for 3 days) under fed conditions and a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, crossover study to evaluate the effect of food intake on the pharmacokinetic properties of the pregabalin SR formulation. Plasma concentrations of pregabalin were measured using LC-MS/MS. The AUC and Cmax for pregabalin were calculated using noncompartmental method and compared between treatments in each study. FINDINGS: Thirty-one individuals in the bioequivalence study and 23 in the food effect study completed the pharmacokinetic sampling. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax,ss and AUC0-τ between the SR and IR formulations were 1.1642 (90% CI, 1.1043-1.2272) and 0.9704 (90% CI, 0.9372-1.0047), respectively. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0-last between the SR formulation in the fed state and in the fasted state were 1.6514 (90% CI, 1.3820-1.9732) and 1.7899 (90%CI, 1.4499-2.2097), respectively. IMPLICATIONS: The bioavailability of the pregabalin SR 300 mg formulation is increased if taken with a high-fat meal. Once-daily pregabalin SR 300 mg is bioequivalent to twice-daily pregabalin IR 150 mg under fed conditions at steady state. The pregabalin SR formulation is expected to improve patient adherence. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02783183 (bioequivalence study) and NCT03191136 (food effect study).

A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of YH12852, a highly selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor agonist, in healthy subjects and patients with functional constipation.

YH12852, a novel, highly selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 (5-HT4 ) receptor agonist, is currently under development to treat patients with functional constipation. In this study, we aimed to develop a pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) model that adequately described the time courses of the plasma concentrations of YH12852 and its prokinetic effect as assessed by the Gastric Emptying Breath Test (GEBT) and to predict the prokinetic effect of YH12852 at higher doses through PD simulation. We used the plasma concentrations of YH12852 from patients with functional constipation and healthy subjects and the GEBT results from healthy subjects obtained from a phase I/IIa trial. The PK-PD modeling and covariate analysis were performed using NONMEM software. The prokinetic effect of YH12852 was described using a semimechanistic multicompartment PD model and an empirical model by Ghoos et al. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption adequately described the observed concentration-time profiles of YH12852. The semimechanistic multicompartment PD model and the revised Ghoos model with two slope parameters adequately described the observed kPCDt (the percent dose of 13 C excreted in the exhaled air at minute t after completing the test meal, multiplied by 1000) values. YH12852 accelerated gastric emptying even at low doses of 0.05-0.1 mg, and its prokinetic effect was greater in subjects suffering from more severe functional constipation. The PD simulation experiments revealed that the change from baseline in the half time for gastric emptying induced by YH12852 increased in a dose-dependent manner at 0.05-5 mg although the results at doses >0.1 mg were extrapolated. We also showed that the empirical Ghoos model is a special case of the general semimechanistic multicompartment PD model for gastric emptying.

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model adequately predicted the human pharmacokinetic profiles of YH4808, a novel K+-competitive acid blocker.

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed for YH4808, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, using the SimCYP® Simulator based on the physicochemical, in vitro preclinical and clinical data of YH4808. The PBPK model was optimized using YH4808 concentrations obtained from the single-dose phase I clinical trial. Overall, the PBPK model adequately predicted the observed pharmacokinetic profiles of YH4808 in humans. The pharmacokinetic profiles of YH4808 after multiple oral administrations were predicted using a refined PBPK model. The ratios of model-predicted to observed Cmax, AUCinf and AUCτ values on Day 1 and Day 7 at 100 mg were 0.7-1.0. However, the model failed to predict a decreased exposure after multiple oral administration particularly at higher doses of 200 and 400 mg. The reduced solubility of YH4808 at higher pH was hypothesized as the main cause of the reduction in exposure such that absorption was decreased as pH was increased. This hypothesis was confirmed by PBPK modeling and simulation, where intragastric pH was increased by YH4808.

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of YH4808, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, after single- and multiple-oral dosing in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: YH4808 is a potassium-competitive acid blocker, developed for the treatment of acid-related disorders. Two clinical studies in healthy male subjects were conducted to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of YH4808. METHODS: The first study, a randomized, three-treatment, three-period, crossover study, compared pharmacokinetics of YH4808 (300 mg) after a single dose at fed state with a standard or a high-fat meal to those at fasted state. The second study, a randomized, two-treatment, two-period, crossover study, investigated pharmacokinetics at fasted or fed state with a standard meal after twice daily dose of YH4808 (100 mg) for 7 days. Bloods for pharmacokinetic evaluation were sampled up to 48 h post-dose and 24 h post-dose at steady state, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental method. RESULTS: After single dosing, the geometric means of maximum plasma concentration increased by 1.2 and 2.1 times in the fed states with a standard meal and a high-fat meal, respectively, of that in fasted state. Corresponding values of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable time point increased by 1.8 and 2.8 times, respectively. After multiple dosing, the geometric mean for 24-h AUC at steady state slightly increased in fed state by 1.1 times of that in fasted state. CONCLUSIONS: As fat content of the food increased, the systemic exposure of YH4808 after single dosing increased. However, systemic exposures at steady state after multiple dosing between fasted and fed states were similar. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registry no.: NCT01520012.

Pharmacokinetics of a telmisartan/rosuvastatin fixed-dose combination: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study in healthy Korean subjects.

OBJECTIVE: As hypertension and dyslipidemia are frequent comorbidities, antihypertensive drugs and lipid-lowering agents are often prescribed together for their treatment. Telmisartan and rosuvastatin are widely used together to treat hypertension and dyslipidemia. A combination formulation of these two drugs would improve patient compliance due to ease of dosing. The purpose of this study was to assess bioequivalence of single-dose administration of a newly-developed fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet containing telmisartan/rosuvastatin 80/20 mg (test treatment) and coadministration of a telmisartan 80-mg tablet and a rosuvastatin 20-mg tablet (reference treatment) in healthy Korean male volunteers. METHODS: This was a single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study enrolling healthy males aged 20 - 50 years with BMI between 18.5 and 25 kg/m2. Each subject received a single dose of the reference and test treatments with a 14-day washout period. Blood sampling was performed at prespecified intervals for up to 72 hours after dosing. Primary pharmacokinetic parameters were Cmax, AUClast, and AUC0-∞ of telmisartan, rosuvastatin, and N-desmethyl rosuvastatin. Bioequivalence was assessed by determining whether the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (test treatment/reference treatment) of these parameters were within the standard range of 80% to 125%. Adverse events were monitored via regular interviews with the subjects and by physical examinations. RESULTS: 60 subjects were enrolled and 55 completed the study. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUClast, and AUC00-∞ were 0.9262-1.1498, 0.9294-1.0313, and 0.9312-1.0320 for telmisartan, 0.9041-1.0428, 0.9262-1.0085, and 0.9307-1.0094 for rosuvastatin, and 0.8718-1.0022, 0.8901-0.9904, and 0.8872-0.9767 for N-desmethyl rosuvastatin, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of adverse events (AEs) (all of which were mild or moderate) between the reference and test treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the telmisartan/rosuvastatin FDC is bioequivalent to coadministration of separate tablets, and both treatments were safe and well tolerated. Administration of this FDC tablet is expected to improve patient compliance.

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interaction between rosuvastatin and valsartan in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: Valsartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker, and rosuvastatin, a competitive inhibitor of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, are frequently coadministered to treat patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia. The study reported here sought to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between rosuvastatin and valsartan in healthy Korean subjects. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy male Korean subjects were administered with rosuvastatin (20 mg/day), valsartan (160 mg/day), and both drugs concomitantly for 4 days in a randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, three-treatment, three-period crossover study. Plasma concentrations of rosuvastatin, N-desmethyl rosuvastatin, and valsartan were determined using validated high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Lipid profiles and vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate) were measured for the pharmacodynamic assessment. RESULTS: For rosuvastatin, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) of coadministration to mono-administration were 0.8809 (0.7873-0.9857) for maximum plasma concentration at steady state and 0.9151 (0.8632-0.9701) for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over a dosing interval at steady state. For valsartan, the geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of those were 0.9300 (0.7946-1.0884) and 1.0072 (0.8893-1.1406), respectively. There were no significant differences in the metabolic ratio of N-desmethyl rosuvastatin AUC to rosuvastatin AUC between coadministration and rosuvastatin alone. No interaction was found in terms of systolic or diastolic blood pressure or lipid profiles. Combined treatment with valsartan and rosuvastatin was generally well tolerated without serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic profiles of rosuvastatin and valsartan in combination were comparable with those of rosuvastatin and valsartan administered individually, suggesting that their individual pharmacokinetics were not affected by their coadministration. No dose adjustment was required and the results are supportive of a study in a larger patient population.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between rosuvastatin and telmisartan in healthy Korean male volunteers: a randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover, multiple-dose study.

PURPOSE: Rosuvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, and telmisartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, are commonly prescribed in combination for the treatment of dyslipidemia accompanied by hypertension. However, the nature of the pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 drugs is not clearly understood. The goal of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between rosuvastatin and telmisartan in a healthy Korean population. METHODS: This was a randomized, 2-part, open-label, 2-period, crossover, multiple-dose study, with each part composed of different subjects between the ages of 20 and 55 years. In part 1, each subject received rosuvastatin 20 mg with and without telmisartan 80 mg once daily for 6 consecutive days. In part 2, each subject received telmisartan 80 mg with and without rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 consecutive days. In both parts, there was a 16-day washout period between mono- and coadministration. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after the last dose. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated through interviews and physical examinations. FINDINGS: In part 1, the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters for coadministration of the 2 drugs to monoadministration of each drug were 1.0736-1.2932 for AUCτ and 1.7442-2.3229 for Cmax,ss for rosuvastatin and 0.9942-1.1594 for AUCτ and 1.3593-1.7169 for Cmax,ss for N-desmethyl rosuvastatin, whereas in part 2, the CIs were 1.0834-1.2672 for AUCτ and 1.1534-1.5803 for Cmax,ss for telmisartan. The most frequently noted AE was cough in part 1, which occurred in 2 subjects receiving the combination therapy, and oropharyngeal pain in part 2, which occurred in 3 subjects receiving the combination therapy. All reported AEs were mild or moderate, and there was no significant difference in incidence between the treatments. IMPLICATIONS: These findings demonstrated that rosuvastatin and telmisartan mutually affected each other's pharmacokinetics, suggesting a possibility of drug-drug interaction. However, based on dose-response characteristics of the 2 drugs and previous results from other interaction studies, the degree of drug interaction observed in this study was not regarded as clinically significant. All treatments were well tolerated, with no serious AEs observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01992601.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between rosuvastatin and metformin in healthy Korean male volunteers: a randomized, open-label, 3-period, crossover, multiple-dose study.

PURPOSE: Rosuvastatin is indicated for hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia and metformin mainly for type 2 diabetes. These 2 drugs are frequently prescribed in combination due to the high comorbidity of the 2 diseases. However the nature of pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 drugs has not been previously investigated. The purpose of our study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between rosuvastatin and metformin in healthy Korean male volunteers. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, 6-sequence, 3-period, crossover, multiple-dose study. Eligible subjects, aged 20 to 50 years and within 20% of the ideal body weight, received 1 of the following 3 treatments for each period once daily for 5 consecutive days with a 10-day washout period between the treatments: monoadministration of rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet, monoadministration of metformin 750 mg tablet, and coadministration of rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet with metformin 750 mg tablet. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after the last dose and pharmacokinetic parameters for rosuvastatin and metformin were compared between combination and monotherapy. Adverse events were investigated and evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations. FINDINGS: Among the 36 enrolled subjects, 31 completed the study. The coadministration of rosuvastatin with metformin produced a significant pharmacokinetic interaction in rosuvastatin Css,max, with the 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio (coadministration:monoadministration) being 110.27% to 136.39% (P = 0.0029), whereas no significant interaction was observed in rosuvastatin AUCtau, yielding the 90% CI of 104.41% to 118.95%. When metformin was coadministered with rosuvastatin, no significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed for Css,max and AUCtau of metformin, yielding the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratio for coadministration to monoadministration as 87.38% to 102.54% and 86.70% to 99.08%, respectively. Overall, 19 mild and 1 moderate adverse events occurred in 12 subjects, with no significant differences in the incidence among the 3 treatments. IMPLICATIONS: Although the Css,max of rosuvastatin was significantly influenced by coadministration with metformin, the degree of interaction seen was considered clinically insignificant, with no significant interaction observed in the other pharmacokinetic measures between the 2 drugs. These results imply that drug effects of rosuvastatin and metformin will also not be significantly influenced by coadministration of the 2 drugs. All treatments were well tolerated and no serious adverse events occurred. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01526317.

Development of a pharmacokinetic interaction model for co-administration of simvastatin and amlodipine.

A model for drug interaction between amlodipine and simvastatin was developed using concentration data obtained from a multiple-dose study consisting of single- and co-administration of amlodipine and simvastatin conducted in healthy Koreans. Amlodipine concentrations were assumed to influence the clearance of simvastatin and simvastatin acid, which as well as the oral bioavailability was allowed to vary depending on genetic polymorphisms of metabolic enzymes. Covariate effects on drug concentrations were also considered. The developed model yielded a 46% increase in simvastatin bioavailability and a 13% decrease in simvastatin clearance when amlodipine 10 mg was co-administered. When CYP3A4/5 polymorphisms were assessed by a mixture model, extensive metabolizers yielded a decrease in simvastatin bioavailability of 81% and a decrease in simvastatin clearance by 4.6 times as compared to poor metabolizers. Sixty percent of the usual dose was the optimal simvastatin dose that can minimize the interaction with amlodipine 10 mg. Age and weight had significant effects on amlodipine concentrations. In conclusion, this study has quantitatively described the pharmacokinetic interaction between simvastatin and amlodipine using a modeling approach. Given that the two drugs are often prescribed together, the developed model is expected to contribute to more efficient and safer drug treatment when they are co-administered.

Bioavailability and tolerability of combination treatment with revaprazan 200 mg + itopride 150 mg: a randomized crossover study in healthy male Korean volunteers.

BACKGROUND: To date, no definitive treatment of functional dyspepsia (FD) has been proven to be effective and reasonably well-tolerated. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) combined with prokinetic agents are considered an effective option. Revaprazan is a selective potassium-competitive acid blocker that reversibly inhibits gastric H(+)/K(+)-ATPase and shows effective acid suppression comparable to PPIs. Itopride is a prokinetic agent that has anticholinesterase activity as well as dopamine D(2) receptor antagonistic activity. For this reason, revaprazan and itopride have been prescribed for FD; however, no available studies have reported the pharmacokinetic interactions of these 2 drugs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the bioavailability and tolerability of revaprazan and itopride combination therapy to those of equally dosed monotherapies to acquire basic drug-drug interaction information about revaprazan. METHODS: This multiple-dose, randomized crossover study was conducted in healthy male Korean subjects. Subjects received, in randomized sequence, a 7-day oral dose of revaprazan 200 mg once daily, itopride 50 mg TID, or both. Each treatment period was separated by a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected for up to 24 hours following the last dose at steady state, and drug concentrations were determined using validated LC/MS-MS. Pharmacokinetic properties were obtained using noncompartmental analysis. Drug tolerability was assessed throughout the study, using measurements of vital signs, clinical chemistry testing, and interviews. RESULTS: A total of 30 subjects were enrolled in the study. Among them, 28 subjects completed revaprazan treatment, and 27 completed the study (3 subjects were withdrawn). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% CI) of C(max,ss), and AUC(τ,ss) with revaprazan were 0.92 (0.84-1.00) and 0.96 (0.89-1.03), respectively. The GMRs of C(max,ss) and AUC(τ,ss) with itopride were 1.07 (0.96-1.20) and 1.12 (1.06-1.18), respectively. A total of 15 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 8 subjects. All AEs were considered to be mild, and there were no clinically significant differences between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The findings from this study suggest bioequivalence between revaprazan given as monotherapy and in combination with itopride in these healthy Korean male volunteers, with no clinical significant drug-drug interaction. All treatments in this study was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT0133289.

Effect of HMGCR variant alleles on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering response to atorvastatin in healthy Korean subjects.

The investigators quantified the relationship between the genetic polymorphism of HMGCR (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase) and the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering effects of atorvastatin in a prospective clinical study. Twenty-four healthy participants were grouped into HMGCR rs3846662 GG (n = 13) and AA (n = 11) genotypes and given atorvastatin (20 mg/d) for 14 days. Serum levels of LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and creatinine kinase (CK) were measured before (day 1) and 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21, and 28 days after dosing initiation. Blood samples for pharmacokinetics were taken on days 14 through 16. The levels of LDL-C in the GG group were significantly higher than in the AA group at all observation times, with mean differences of 18% to 33% (P < .05). The area under the LDL-C-time curve and the minimum value of LDL-C in the GG group were 24% and 23% higher than in the AA group, respectively (P < .01). There was no significant difference in other lipids, CK, and pharmacokinetic parameters. The HMGCR rs3846662 GG genotype was quantitatively documented to be a significant determinant for higher LDL-C level in basal state and possibly in response to atorvastatin.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of sustained- and immediate-release oral formulations of cilostazol in healthy Korean subjects: a randomized, open-label, 3-part, sequential, 2-period, crossover, single-dose, food-effect, and multiple-dose study.

BACKGROUND: A sustained-release (SR) formulation of cilostazol was recently developed in Korea and was expected to yield a lower C(max) and a similar AUC to the immediate-release (IR) formulation. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of a newly developed SR formulation and an IR formulation of cilostazol after single- and multiple-dose administration and to evaluate the influence of food in healthy Korean subjects. This study was developed as part of a product development project at the request of the Korean regulatory agency. METHODS: This was a randomized, 3-part, sequential, open-label, 2-period crossover study. Each part consisted of different subjects between the ages of 19 and 55 years. In part 1, each subject received a single dose of SR (200 mg × 1 tablet, once daily) and IR (100 mg × 2 tablets, BID) formulations of cilostazol orally 7 days apart in a fasted state. In part 2, each subject received a single dose of the SR (200 mg × 1 tablet, once daily) formulation of cilostazol 7 days apart in a fasted and a fed state. In part 3, each subject received multiple doses of the 2 formulations for 8 consecutive days 21 days apart. Blood samples were taken for 72 hours after the dose. Cilostazol pharmacokinetics were determined for both the parent drug and its metabolites (OPC-13015 and OPC-13213). Adverse events were evaluated through interviews and physical examinations. RESULTS: Among the 92 enrolled subjects (66 men, 26 women; part 1, n = 26; part 2, n = 26; part 3, n = 40), 87 completed the study. In part 1, all the primary pharmacokinetic parameters satisfied the criterion for assumed bioequivalence both in cilostazol and its metabolites, yielding 90% CI ratios of 0.9624 to 1.2323, 0.8873 to 1.1208, and 0.8919 to 1.1283 for C(max) and 0.8370 to 1.0134, 0.8204 to 0.9807, and 0.8134 to 0.9699 for AUC(0-last) of cilostazol, OPC-13015, and OPC-13213, respectively. In part 2, food intake increased C(max) and AUC significantly (P < 0.0001), yielding geometric mean ratios of 3.2879, 2.9894, and 3.0592 for C(max) and 1.7001, 1.7689, and 1.6976 for AUC(0-last) of cilostazol, OPC-13015, and OPC-13213. In part 3, only the C(ssmax) of clilostazol in the reference formulation did not satisfy the criterion for assumed bioequivalence, yielding 90% CI ratios of 1.2693 to 1.4238 and 1.2038 to 1.3441, respectively. When each dose was normalized, the C(max) for the SR formulation was significantly lower (P < 0.005 for cilostazol). Headache was the most frequently noted adverse effect (part 1, a total of 14 subjects with the IR formulation and 14 with the SR formulation; part 2, a total of 10 without food and 23 with a high-fat meal; part 3, a total of 10 with the IR formulation and 24 with the SR formulation), followed by nausea (part 1, none; part 2, only 1 without food and 3 with a high-fat meal; part 3, a total of 3 with the IR formulation and 3 with the SR formulation), and then dizziness (parts 1 and 2, none; part 3, a total of 4 with the IR formulation and 5 with the SR formulation). All other AEs, including fever, cough, vomiting, palpitation, diarrhea, and epigastric pain, occurred in <3 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that in this select group of healthy Korean volunteers, the SR formulation of cilostazol was not significantly different in AUC compared with that of the IR formulation, although it did display a significantly lower C(max) per dose in both the single- and multiple-dose groups. Food significantly increased the bioavailability of the SR formulation. The cilostazol SR and IR formulations were well tolerated in all parts of the study, with no serious adverse events reported. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01455558.

The effect of beta1-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphism on prolongation of corrected QT interval during endotracheal intubation under sevoflurane anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation are associated with sympathoadrenal activity. Polymorphisms in the beta1-adrenergic receptor (ß(1)AR) gene can alter the pathophysiology of specific diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the Ser49Gly and Arg389Gly polymorphism of the ß(1)AR gene have different cardiovascular responses during endotracheal intubation under sevoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Ninety-one healthy patients undergoing general anesthesia were enrolled. Patients underwent slow inhalation induction of anesthesia using sevoflurane in 100% oxygen. Vecuronium 0.15 mg/kg was given for muscle relaxation. Endotracheal intubation was performed by an anesthesiologist. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and the corrected QT (QTc) interval were measured before induction, before laryngoscopy, and immediately after tracheal intubation. Genomic DNA was isolated from the patients' peripheral blood and then evaluated for the ß(1)AR-49 and ß(1)AR-389 genes using an allele-specific polymerase chain reaction method. RESULTS: No differences were found in the baseline values of MAP, HR, and the QTc interval among ß(1)AR-49 and ß(1)AR-389, respectively. In the case of ß(1)AR-49, the QTc interval change immediately after tracheal intubation was significantly greater in Ser/Ser genotypes than in Ser/Gly genotypes. No differences were observed immediately after tracheal intubation in MAP and HR for ß(1)AR-49 and ß(1)AR-389. CONCLUSIONS: We found an association between the Ser49 homozygote gene of ß(1)AR-49 polymorphism and increased QTc prolongation during endotracheal intubation with sevoflurane anesthesia. Thus, ß(1)AR-49 polymorphism may be useful in predicting the risk of arrhythmia during endotracheal intubation in patients with long QT syndrome.

Effect of CYP2B6 genotype on the pharmacokinetics of sibutramine and active metabolites in healthy subjects.

Sibutramine is a pharmacologic intervention for the treatment of obesity. The effect of CYP2B6 genotypes on the pharmacokinetics of sibutramine and its active metabolites (desmethylsibutramine [M1] and didesmethylsibutramine [M2]) was evaluated in 57 healthy subjects. Each subject received a single oral dose of 10 or 15 mg sibutramine, and blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after dosing. The relationship between the genotypes and the pharmacokinetics of sibutramine, M1, and M2 was examined. A statistically significant difference in the elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of sibutramine M1 was found among the 3 genotype groups (P = .0006), between the *1/*1 and *1/*6 groups (P = .0001), and between the *1/*4 and *1/*6 groups (P = .012). The mean value of M1 t(1/2) in *1/*6 (33.3 ± 10.5 hours) was about 58% and 61% greater than that of the *1/*1 group (21.0 ± 7.4 hours) and the *1/*4 group (20.7 ± 9.8 hours), respectively. No significant differences in area under the concentration-time curve or maximum plasma drug concentration were observed between the groups. The CYP2B6*6 allele may be associated with a lower metabolic clearance of the M1 metabolite of sibutramine in human subjects.

Modeling the effect of sevoflurane on corrected QT prolongation: a pharmacodynamic analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane may prolong the corrected QT (QTc) interval in healthy humans when administered for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Little information is available about the dose-response relationship of sevoflurane on the QTc interval. We performed a pharmacodynamic analysis of the relationship between end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (CET) and the QTc. METHODS: Twenty-one patients aged 20-50 yr were enrolled in this study. Sevoflurane concentrations were progressively increased and then decreased over 15 min at the start of anesthesia; CET and automated QT interval were recorded continuously. Pharmacodynamic analysis using a sigmoid Emax model was performed to assess the concentration-effect relationship. RESULTS: Maximal CET was 4.30 ± 0.33%. Measured baseline and maximally prolonged QTc interval values were 351.7 ± 15.4 ms and 397.8 ± 17.5 ms, respectively. During sevoflurane anesthesia, increased concentrations were correlated with prolonged QTc interval. Hysteresis between the CET and QTc interval were observed and accounted for in the model. Ce50 and ke0 were 2.5 ± 1.4 and 2.0 ± 1.0, respectively. The median prediction error, median absolute prediction error, and the coefficient of determination (R) were 0.02%, 0.75%, and 0.95, respectively. The effect-site concentration (Ce50) and QTc interval data fit to a sigmoid Emax model. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients receiving sevoflurane for anesthesia, QTc interval changes correlate to anesthetic level. The Ce50 for significant QTc change is at clinically relevant levels of sevoflurane anesthesia.