Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 206(6): 528.e1-6, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22459346

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of a visual urethral mobility examination (VUME) with a Q-Tip test in the assessment of urethral hypermobility. STUDY DESIGN: Subjects were randomized to a VUME or Q-Tip test first, followed by the alternate assessment. Outcomes included hypermobile, not hypermobile, or indeterminate. Hypermobility was defined as 30° or greater from the horizontal. Pain perception and test preference were assessed. RESULTS: For the 54 subjects, 61.1% demonstrated hypermobility on VUME vs 72.2% on the Q-Tip test (P = .39). Assessment of hypermobility was correlated between the 2 tools (ρ = 0.47, P = .001). Positive and negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity for VUME were 88%, 56%, 78%, and 71%, respectively, with a Q-Tip test as the reference standard. Mean pain score on visual analog scale was 0.72 for VUME and 3.15 for Q-tip test (P < .001). VUME was preferred by 83% of subjects. CONCLUSION: VUME is a diagnostic alternative to the Q-Tip test for the assessment of urethral hypermobility and is preferred by subjects.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico , Uretra/fisiopatologia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Estudos Cross-Over , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Preferência do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos Piloto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...