[Is the direct admission to the recovery service or to the intensive care unit of patients cared for by the Smur system justified?]. / L'admission directe en service de réanimation ou de soins intensifs des patients pris en charge par le Smur est-elle justifiée?

STUDY DESIGN: The French system of Samu-Smur allows the admission of patients directly in intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study is to examine the utility of the Samu-Smur with regard to such direct admission (DA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was performed by the Samu of Paris. Patient details were gathered from three reports: namely hospitalization, transport and regulation reports. These were analysed to decide whether the admission diagnostic was exact, whether the patient's condition was serious, whether the prehospital treatment justified direct admission into an ICU and whether the management was coherent. RESULTS: In 1997, 409 (31%) cases were studied among the 1,350 admitted patients in ICU. Three groups of patients were classified according to admission to surgical (n = 54), medical (n = 180), cardiological ICU (n = 175). The prehospital diagnosis was confirmed by the hospitalization report in 91% of patients in the all three groups. The patient's condition was found to the serious in all cases. Justification of the treatment was respectively found in 96, 88 and 84% of patients. The coherence of management was confirmed in 94, 96 and 89%. DISCUSSION: This study has shown that Samu-Smur management lead to justified DA in ICU for all patients in the study. Prospective studies are needed to show the advantages of this strategy in term of speed of management and outcome.

Health hazards in international tourists visiting Paris in August: a five-year retrospective epidemiologic survey.

BACKGROUND: Travel-related illnesses have been studied in visitors to developing countries, but no studies have examined the incidence of health problems in visitors to developed countries. METHODS: 4, 093 foreign tourists visiting Paris in August and attending to emergency medical care for acute health problems were included in an epidemiological survey conducted over 5 consecutive years. The objective was to determine what types of acute health problems occur in a foreign tourist population and to estimate the incidence of the main health hazards. RESULTS: Gastroenteritis represented the main cause of medical care in that population (from 14.5-21.9%) followed by traumatology, ENT problem, viral syndrome and dermatology which represented altogether 60-64% of all medical problems. Two factors were related to the distribution of diseases observed: age and nationality. The monthly incidence of gastroenteritis was estimated to be between 1.33 to 2.92 per 10,000 visitors, and the overall incidence of health problems between 8 to 10 per 10,000. CONCLUSIONS: Even if the incidence rate of gastroenteritis is low compared with developing countries, further studies are needed to support the hypothesis that gastroenteritis could be attributed to sanitary conditions in some restaurants of the French capital.

[Emergency consultations of foreign tourists in Paris in the month of August. 5 years of prospective surveillance (1992-1996)]. / Consultations d'urgence des touristes étrangers à Paris au mois d'août. Cinq années de surveillance prospective (1992-1996).

For five consecutive years, five major Parisian institutions in charge of emergencies have participated in a prospective collection of medical data for foreign patients visiting Paris in August; 4093 subjects have been studied. Gastroenteritis represented the main cause in calling on emergency medical care (14.5 to 21.9%), followed by traumatology, ear-nose-throat problems, syndromes labelled as viral, skin problems: these five categories represented 60 to 64% of all the serious problems encountered by tourists. The statistical frequency of different causes in calling on emergency care varied significantly according to two variables: the tourists' age and nationality. The incidence of gastroenteritis is estimated at between 13 and 30 per 100,000 visitors and the incidence of pathological problems taken all together--at 80 to 100 per 100,000.

End-tidal carbon dioxide during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: comparison of active compression-decompression and standard CPR.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the maximal end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (ETCO2 peak) values obtained during standard (S-CPR) and active compression-decompression CPR (ACD-CPR) during prolonged resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized crossover study. SETTING: City with a population of 3.5 million, served by an emergency medical service system providing advanced cardiac life support. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive first, for a period of 3 minutes, either ACD-CPR or S-CPR; then the two methods were alternated. ETCO2 was continuously monitored and computed. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Sixteen patients (48 +/- 20 years old) were included; in 12, return of spontaneous circulation was achieved, and 5 were admitted alive to the hospital. A statistically significant increase in ETCO2 peak was obtained with ACD-CPR (27.6 +/- 3 mm Hg) compared with S-CPR (15.6 +/- 2.2 mm Hg). No major adverse effect possibly related to ACD-CPR was observed. CONCLUSION: This prospective study suggests that ACD-CPR may improve cardiac output compared with S-CPR.

[Prehospital fibrinolysis with rt-PA in acute myocardial infarction]. / Fibrinolyse préhospitalière par rt-PA dans l'infarctus aigu du myocarde.

Thrombolytic therapy has been shown to be very effective in the acute phase of myocardial infarction and the benefits are greater if the treatment is initiated as soon as possible. In France, early treatment in the prehospital phase is possible through the SAMU, an emergency ambulance and care unit organisation. Between December 1987 and November 1988, 80 patients (73 men and 7 women) with an average age of 55 +/- 9 years were treated by rt-PA (100 mg i.v. in 90 minutes) for acute myocardial infarction within three and a half hours of the onset of symptoms. The average delay between the onset of pain and the administration of rt-PA was 126 +/- 43 minutes, which represents an estimated average time gain of 55 minutes compared with thrombolysis started after hospital admission. No haemorrhagic or allergic complications occurred during hospital transfer and there was no mortality. There were, however, two diagnostic errors. Thrombolysis was estimated to be effective on clinical, electrocardiographic and enzymatic criteria in 60 p. 100 of cases. Thirty early coronary angiographies (within 48 hours) showed that 83 p. 100 of the arteries thought to be responsible for the infarct were patent. Haemorrhage was a rare complication during the hospital phase and had a favourable outcome. Hospital mortality was 6 per cent. The low morbidity and the reliability of diagnosis indicate that prehospital thrombolysis is feasible in the acute phase of myocardial infarction.