Feasibility to estimate mean systemic filling pressure with inspiratory holds at the bedside.

Background: A decade ago, it became possible to derive mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) at the bedside using the inspiratory hold maneuver. MSFP has the potential to help guide hemodynamic care, but the estimation is not yet implemented in common clinical practice. In this study, we assessed the ability of MSFP, vascular compliance (Csys), and stressed volume (Vs) to track fluid boluses. Second, we assessed the feasibility of implementation of MSFP in the intensive care unit (ICU). Exploratory, a potential difference in MSFP response between colloids and crystalloids was assessed. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study in adult patients admitted to the ICU after cardiac surgery. The MSFP was determined using 3-4 inspiratory holds with incremental pressures (maximum 35 cm H2O) to construct a venous return curve. Two fluid boluses were administered: 100 and 500 ml, enabling to calculate Vs and Csys. Patients were randomized to crystalloid or colloid fluid administration. Trained ICU consultants acted as study supervisors, and protocol deviations were recorded. Results: A total of 20 patients completed the trial. MSFP was able to track the 500 ml bolus (p < 0.001). In 16 patients (80%), Vs and Csys could be determined. Vs had a median of 2029 ml (IQR 1605-3164), and Csys had a median of 73 ml mmHg-1 (IQR 56-133). A difference in response between crystalloids and colloids was present for the 100 ml fluid bolus (p = 0.019) and in a post hoc analysis, also for the 500 ml bolus (p = 0.010). Conclusion: MSFP can be measured at the bedside and provides insights into the hemodynamic status of a patient that are currently missing. The clinical feasibility of Vs and Csys was judged ambiguously based on the lack of required hemodynamic stability. Future studies should address the clinical obstacles found in this study, and less-invasive alternatives to determine MSFP should be further explored. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03139929.

Defining human mean circulatory filling pressure in the intensive care unit.

Potentially, mean circulatory filling pressure (Pmcf) could aid hemodynamic management in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). However, data regarding the normal range for Pmcf do not exist challenging its clinical use. We aimed to define the range for Pmcf for ICU patients and also calculated in what percentage of cases equilibrium between arterial blood pressure (ABP) and central venous pressure (CVP) was reached. In patients in whom no equilibrium was reached, we corrected for arterial-to-venous compliance differences. Finally, we studied the influence of patient characteristics on Pmcf. We hypothesized fluid balance, the use of vasoactive medication, being on mechanical ventilation, and the level of positive end-expiratory pressure would be positively associated with Pmcf. We retrospectively studied a cohort of 311 patients that had cardiac arrest in ICU while having active recording of ABP and CVP 1 min after death. Median Pmcf was 15 mmHg [interquartile range (IQR) 12-18]. ABP and CVP reached an equilibrium state in 52% of the cases. Correction for arterial-to-venous compliances differences resulted in a maximum alteration of 1.3 mmHg in Pmcf. Fluid balance over the last 24 h, the use of vasoactive medication, and being on mechanical ventilation were associated with a higher Pmcf. Median Pmcf was 15 mmHg (IQR 12-18). When ABP remained higher than CVP, correction for arterial-to-venous compliance differences did not result in a clinically relevant alteration of Pmcf. Pmcf was affected by factors known to alter vasomotor tone and effective circulating blood volume.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In a cohort of 311 intensive care unit (ICU) patients, median mean circulatory filling pressure (Pmcf) measured after cardiac arrest was 15 mmHg (interquartile range 12-18). In 48% of cases, arterial blood pressure remained higher than central venous pressure, but correction for arterial-to-venous compliance differences did not result in clinically relevant alterations of Pmcf. Fluid balance, use of vasopressors or inotropes, and being on mechanical ventilation were associated with a higher Pmcf.

Determination of cardiac output from pulse pressure contour during intra-aortic balloon pumping in patients with low ejection fraction.

Evaluation of a new Windkessel model based pulse contour method (WKflow) to calculate stroke volume in patients undergoing intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP). Preload changes were induced by vena cava occlusions (VCO) in twelve patients undergoing cardiac surgery to vary stroke volume (SV), which was measured by left ventricular conductance volume method (SVlv) and WKflow (SVwf). Twelve VCO series were carried out during IABP assist at a 1:2 ratio and seven VCO series were performed with IABP switched off. Additionally, SVwf was evaluated during nine episodes of severe arrhythmia. VCO's produced marked changes in SV over 10-20 beats. 198 paired data sets of SVlv and SVwf were obtained. Bland-Altman analysis for the difference between SVlv and SVwf during IABP in 1:2 mode showed a bias (accuracy) of 1.04 ± 3.99 ml, precision 10.9% and limits of agreement (LOA) of - 6.94 to 9.02 ml. Without IABP bias was 0.48 ± 4.36 ml, precision 11.6% and LOA of - 8.24 to 9.20 ml. After one thermodilution calibration of SVwf per patient, during IABP the accuracy improved to 0.14 ± 3.07 ml, precision to 8.3% and LOA to - 6.00 to + 6.28 ml. Without IABP the accuracy improved to 0.01 ± 2.71 ml, precision to 7.5% and LOA to - 5.41 to + 5.43 ml. Changes in SVlv and SVwf were directionally concordant in response to VCO's and during severe arrhythmia. (R2 = 0.868). The SVwf and SVlv methods are interchangeable with respect to measuring absolute stroke volume as well as tracking changes in stroke volume. The precision of the non-calibrated WKflow method is about 10% which improved to 7.5% after one calibration per patient.

A mini-fluid challenge of 150mL predicts fluid responsiveness using ModelflowR pulse contour cardiac output directly after cardiac surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The mini-fluid challenge may predict fluid responsiveness with minimum risk of fluid overloading. However, the amount of fluid as well as the best manner to evaluate the effect is unclear. In this prospective observational pilot study, the value of changes in pulse contour cardiac output (CO) measurements during mini-fluid challenges is investigated. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Intensive Care Unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-one patients directly after elective cardiac surgery on mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were subsequently given 10 intravenous boluses of 50mL of hydroxyethyl starch with a total of 500mL per patient while measuring pulse contour CO. MEASUREMENTS: We measured CO by minimal invasive ModelflowR (COm) and PulseCOR (COli), before and one minute after each fluid bolus. We analyzed the smallest volume that was predictive of fluid responsiveness. A positive fluid response was defined as an increase in CO of >10% after 500mL fluid infusion. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen patients (71%) were COm responders and 13 patients (62%) COli responders. An increase in COm after 150mL of fluid >5.0% yielded a positive and negative predictive value (+PV and -PV) of 100% with an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.00 (P<0.001). An increase in COli >6.3% after 200mL was able to predict a fluid response in COli after 500mL with a +PV of 100% and -PV of 73%, with an AUC of 0.88 (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of minimal invasive ModelflowR pulse contour CO measurements following a mini-fluid challenge of 150mL can predict fluid responsiveness and may help to improve fluid management.

Hemodynamic effects of short-term hyperoxia after coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Although oxygen is generally administered in a liberal manner in the perioperative setting, the effects of oxygen administration on dynamic cardiovascular parameters, filling status and cerebral perfusion have not been fully unraveled. Our aim was to study the acute hemodynamic and microcirculatory changes before, during and after arterial hyperoxia in mechanically ventilated patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. METHODS: This was a single-center physiological study in a tertiary care ICU in the Netherlands. Twenty-two patients scheduled for ICU admission after elective CABG were enrolled in the study between September 2014 and September 2015. In the ICU, patients were exposed to a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 90% allowing a 15-min wash-in period. Various hemodynamic parameters were measured using direct pressure signals and continuous arterial waveform analysis at three sequential time points: before, during and after hyperoxia. RESULTS: During a 15-min exposure to a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 90%, the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) were significantly higher. The systemic resistance increased (P < 0.0001), without altering the heart rate. Stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation decreased slightly. The cardiac output did not significantly decrease (P = 0.08). Mean systemic filling pressure and arterial critical closing pressure increased (P < 0.01whereas the percentage of perfused microcirculatory vessels decreased (P < 0.01). Other microcirculatory parameters and cerebral blood flow velocity showed only slight changes. CONCLUSIONS: We found that short-term hyperoxia affects hemodynamics in ICU patients after CABG. This was translated in several changes in central circulatory variables, but had only slight effects on cardiac output, cerebral blood flow and the microcirculation. Clinical trial registration Netherlands Trial Register: NTR5064.

Comparing hemodynamic effects with three different measurement devices, of two methods of external leg compression versus passive leg raising in patients after cardiac surgery.

External leg compression (ELC) may increase cardiac output (CO) in fluid-responsive patients like passive leg raising (PLR). We compared the hemodynamic effects of two methods of ELC and PLR measured by thermodilution (COtd), pressure curve analysis Modelflow™ (COmf) and ultra-sound HemoSonic™ (COhs), to evaluate the method with the greatest hemodynamic effect and the most accurate less invasive method to measure that effect. We compared hemodynamic effects of two different ELC methods (circular, A (n = 16), vs. wide, B (n = 13), bandages inflated to 30 cm H2O for 15 min) with PLR prior to each ELC method, in 29 post-operative cardiac surgical patients. Hemodynamic responses were measured with COtd, COmf and COhs. PLR A increased COtd from 6.1 ± 1.7 to 6.3 ± 1.8 L·min(-1) (P = 0.016), and increased COhs from 4.9 ± 1.5 to 5.3 ± 1.6 L·min(-1) (P = 0.001), but did not increase COmf. ELC A increased COtd from 6.4 ± 1.8 to 6.7 ± 1.9 L·min(-1) (P = 0.001) and COmf from 6.9 ± 1.7 to 7.1 ± 1.8 L·min(-1) (P = 0.021), but did not increase COhs. ELC A increased COtd and COmf as in PLR A. PLR B increased COtd from 5.4 ± 1.3 to 5.8 ± 1.4 L·min(-1) (P < 0.001), and COhs from 5.0 ± 1.0 to 5.4 ± 1.0 L·min(-1) (P = 0.013), but not COmf. ELC B increased COtd from 5.2 ± 1.2 to 5.4 ± 1.1 L·min(-1) (P = 0.003), but less than during PLR B (P = 0.012), while COmf and COhs did not change. Bland-Altman and polar plots showed lower limits of agreement with changes in COtd for COmf than for COhs. The circular leg compression increases CO more than bandage compression, and is able to increase CO as in PLR. The less invasive Modelflow™ can detect these changes reasonably well.

Comprehensive review: is it better to use the Trendelenburg position or passive leg raising for the initial treatment of hypovolemia?

Hypovolemia is a common clinical problem. The Trendelenburg position and passive leg raising (PLR) are routinely used in the initial treatment while awaiting fluid resuscitation. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the hemodynamic effects of PLR and Trendelenburg positioning to determine which position had the most optimal effect on cardiac output (CO). Databases were searched for prospective studies published between 1960 and 2010 in normovolemic or hypovolemic humans; these studies had to investigate the hemodynamic effects within 10 minutes of a postural change from supine. Twenty-one studies were included for PLR (n=431) and 13 studies for Trendelenburg position (n=246). Trendelenburg position increased mean arterial pressure (MAP). Cardiac output increased 9%, or 0.35 L/min, at one minute of head-down tilt. Between 2 and 10 minutes, this increase in CO decreased to 4%, or 0.14 L/min, from baseline. Cardiac output increased at one minute of leg elevation by 6%, or 0.19 L/min. The effect persisted after this period by 6%, or 0.17 L/min. Both Trendelenburg and PLR significantly increased CO, but only PLR seemed to sustain this effect after one minute. Although the Trendelenberg position is a common maneuver for nurses and doctors, PLR may be the better intervention in the initial treatment of hypovolemia.

Evaluation of mean systemic filling pressure from pulse contour cardiac output and central venous pressure.

OBJECTIVE: The volemic status of a patient can be determined by measuring mean systemic filling pressure (Pmsf). Pmsf is obtained from the venous return curve, i.e. the relationship between central venous pressure (Pcv) and blood flow. We evaluated the feasibility and precision of Pmsf measurement. METHODS: In ten piglets we constructed venous return curves using seven 12 s inspiratory holds transiently increasing Pcv to seven different steady state levels and monitored the resultant blood flow, by pulse contour (COpc) and by flow probes around the pulmonary artery (COr) and aorta (COl). Pmsf is obtained by extrapolation of the venous return curve to zero flow. Measurements were repeated to evaluate the precision of Pmsf. RESULTS: During the inspiratory holds, 133 paired data points were obtained for COr, COl, COpc and Pcv. Bland-Altman analysis showed no difference between COr and COl, but a small significant difference was present between COl and COpc. All Pcv versus flow (COl or COpc) relationships were linear. Mean Pmsf was 10.78 with COl and 10.37 mmHg with COpc. Bland-Altman analysis for Pmsf with COl and with COpc, showed a bias of 0.40  ±  0.48 mmHg. The averaged coefficient of variation for repeated measurement of Pmsf with COl was 6.2% and with COpc 6.1%. CONCLUSIONS: During an inspiratory hold pulmonary flow and aortic flow equilibrate. Cardiac output estimates by arterial pulse contour and by a flow probe around the aorta are interchangeable. Therefore, the venous return curve and Pmsf can be estimated accurately by pulse contour methods.

Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In pharmacological research, arm occlusion pressure is used to study haemodynamic effects of drugs. However, arm occlusion pressure might be an indicator of static filling pressure of the arm. We hypothesised that arm occlusion pressure can be used to predict fluid loading responsiveness. METHODS: Twenty-four patients who underwent cardiac surgery were studied during their first 2 h in the ICU. The lungs were ventilated mechanically and left ventricular function was supported as necessary. Arm occlusion pressure was defined as the radial artery pressure after occluding arterial flow for 35 s by a blood pressure cuff inflated to 50 mmHg above SBP. The cuff was positioned around the arm in which a radial artery catheter had been inserted. Measurements were performed before (baseline) and after fluid loading (500 ml hydroxyethyl starch 6%). Patients whose cardiac output increased by at least 10% were defined as responders. RESULTS: In responders (n = 17), arm occlusion pressure, mean arterial pressure and central venous pressure increased and stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation decreased. In non-responders (n = 7), arm occlusion pressure and central venous pressure increased, and pulse pressure variation decreased. Mean arterial pressure, stroke volume variation and heart rate did not change significantly. The area under the curve to predict fluid loading responsiveness for arm occlusion pressure was 0.786 (95% confidence interval 0.567-1.000), at a cut-off of 21.9 mmHg, with sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 88% in predicting fluid loading responsiveness. Prediction of responders with baseline arm occlusion pressure was as good as baseline stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation. CONCLUSION: Arm occlusion pressure was a good predictor of fluid loading responsiveness in our group of cardiac surgery patients and offers clinical advantages over stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation.

Peripheral vascular decoupling in porcine endotoxic shock.

Cardiac output measurement from arterial pressure waveforms presumes a defined relationship between the arterial pulse pressure (PP), vascular compliance (C), and resistance (R). Cardiac output estimates degrade if these assumptions are incorrect. We hypothesized that sepsis would differentially alter central and peripheral vasomotor tone, decoupling the usual pressure wave propagation from central to peripheral sites. We assessed arterial input impedance (Z), C, and R from central and peripheral arterial pressures, and aortic blood flow in an anesthetized porcine model (n = 19) of fluid resuscitated endotoxic shock induced by endotoxin infusion (7 µg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ increased to 14 and 20 µg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ every 10 min and stopped when mean arterial pressure <40 mmHg or Sv(O2) < 45%). Aortic, femoral, and radial artery pressures and aortic and radial artery flows were measured. Z was calculated by FFT of flow and pressure data. R and C were derived using a two-element Windkessel model. Arterial PP increased from aortic to femoral and radial sites. During stable endotoxemia with fluid resuscitation, aortic and radial blood flows returned to or exceeded baseline while mean arterial pressure remained similarly decreased at all three sites. However, aortic PP exceeded both femoral and radial arterial PP. Although Z, R, and C derived from aortic and radial pressure and aortic flow were similar during baseline, Z increases and C decreases when derived from aortic pressure whereas Z decreases and C increases when derived from radial pressure, while R decreased similarly with both pressure signals. This central-to-peripheral vascular tone decoupling, as quantified by the difference in calculated Z and C from aortic and radial artery pressure, may explain the decreasing precision of peripheral arterial pressure profile algorithms in assessing cardiac output in septic shock patients and suggests that different algorithms taking this vascular decoupling into account may be necessary to improve their precision in this patient population.

Bedside assessment of mean systemic filling pressure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The physiology of the venous part of the human circulation seems to be a forgotten component of the circulation in critical care medicine. One of the main reasons, probably, is that measures of right atrial pressure (Pra) do not seem to be directly linked to blood flow. This perception is primarily due to an inability to measure the pressure gradient for venous return. The upstream pressure for venous return is mean systemic filling pressure (Pmsf) and it does not lend itself easily to be measured. Recent clinical studies now demonstrate the basic principles underpinning the measure of Pmsf at the bedside. RECENT FINDINGS: Using routinely available minimally invasive monitoring of continuous cardiac output and Pra, one can accurately construct venous return curves by performing a series of end-inspiratory hold maneuvers, in ventilator-dependent patients. From these venous return curves, the clinician can now finally obtain at the bedside not only Pmsf but also the derived parameters: resistance to venous return, systemic compliance and stressed volume. SUMMARY: Measurement of Pmsf is essential to describe the control of vascular capacitance. It is the key to distinguish between passive and active mechanisms of blood volume redistribution and partitioning total blood volume in stressed and unstressed volume.

Assessing fluid responses after coronary surgery: role of mathematical coupling of global end-diastolic volume to cardiac output measured by transpulmonary thermodilution.

BACKGROUND: Mathematical coupling may explain in part why cardiac filling volumes obtained by transpulmonary thermodilution may better predict and monitor responses of cardiac output to fluid loading than pressures obtained by pulmonary artery catheters (PACs). METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients with hypovolaemia after coronary surgery and a PAC, allowing central venous pressure (CVP) and continuous cardiac index (CCIp) measurements, received a femoral artery catheter for transpulmonary thermodilution measurements of global end-diastolic blood volume index (GEDVI) and cardiac index (CItp). One to five colloid fluid-loading steps of 250 ml were done in each patient (n = 48 total). RESULTS: Fluid responses were predicted and monitored similarly by CItp and CCIp, whereas CItp and CCIp correlated at r = 0.70 (P < 0.001) with a bias of 0.40 l min(-1) m(-2). Changes in volumes (and not in CVP) related to changes in CItp and not in CCIp. Changes in CVP and GEDVI similarly related to changes in CItp, after exclusion of two patients with greatest CItp outliers (as compared to CCIp). Changes in GEDVI correlated better to changes in CItp when derived from the same thermodilution curve than to changes in CItp of unrelated curves and changes in CCIp. CONCLUSIONS: After coronary surgery, fluid responses can be similarly assessed by intermittent transpulmonary and continuous pulmonary thermodilution methods, in spite of overestimation of CCIp by CItp. Filling pressures are poor monitors of fluid responses and superiority of GEDVI can be caused, at least in part, by mathematical coupling when cardiac volume and output are derived from the same thermodilution curve.

Transpulmonary versus continuous thermodilution cardiac output after valvular and coronary artery surgery.

Residual left-sided valvular insufficiencies after valvular surgery may confound transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output (COtp). We compared the technique with the continuous right-sided thermodilution technique (CCO) after valvular surgery (n=8) and coronary artery surgery (n=8). Patients with pulmonary and femoral artery catheters in the intensive care unit (ICU) were included. After valvular surgery, there was minimal aortic insufficiency in four patients and minimal to moderate mitral valve insufficiency in six. Five fluid loading steps (250 ml) were done in each patient. CCO and COtp were measured prior to and 15 min after each step. The cardiac output was lower after valvular than coronary artery surgery but responses to fluid loading steps were similar among surgery types and techniques. After valvular and coronary artery surgery, cardiac output was lower prior to responses than in non-responses to fluids, by either technique. After valvular surgery, COtp and CCO correlated (r=0.64, P<0.001, n=48) but fluid-induced changes did not. After coronary artery surgery, COtp and CCO correlated (r=0.81, P<0.001) and changes also did (r=0.55, P<0.001). At fluid-induced CCO increases <20%, the r for changes in cardiac output measured by both techniques was similar after valvular and coronary artery surgery. Thus, COtp and CCO were of similar value in predicting and monitoring fluid responses after both surgery types. This argues against left-sided valvular insufficiencies confounding COtp.

Assessment of venous return curve and mean systemic filling pressure in postoperative cardiac surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the relationship between blood flow and central venous pressure (Pcv) and to estimate mean systemic filling pressure (Pmsf), circulatory compliance, and stressed volume in patients in the intensive care unit. DESIGN: Intervention study. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twelve mechanically ventilated postoperative cardiac surgery patients. INTERVENTIONS: Inspiratory holds were performed during normovolemia in supine position (baseline), relative hypovolemia by placing the patients in 30 degree head-up position (hypo), and relative hypervolemia by volume loading with 0.5 L colloid (hyper). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured the relationship between blood flow and Pcv using 12-second inspiratory-hold maneuvers transiently increasing Pcv to three different steady-state levels and monitored the resultant blood flow via the pulse contour method during the last 3 seconds. The Pcv to blood flow relation was linear for all measurements with a slope unaltered by relative volume status. Pmsf decreased with hypo and increased with hyper (18.8 +/- 4.5 mm Hg, to 14.5 +/- 3.0 mm Hg, to 29.1 +/- 5.2 mm Hg [baseline, hypo, hyper, respectively, p < 0.05]). Baseline total circulatory compliance was 0.98 mL x mm Hg x kg and stressed volume was 1677 mL. CONCLUSIONS: Pmsf can be determined in intensive care patients with an intact circulation with use of inspiratory pause procedures, making serial measures of circulatory compliance and circulatory stressed volume feasible.

Relative value of pressures and volumes in assessing fluid responsiveness after valvular and coronary artery surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cardiac function may differ after valvular (VS) and coronary artery (CAS) surgery and this may affect assessment of fluid responsiveness. The aim of the study was to compare VS and CAS in the value of cardiac filling pressures and volumes herein. METHODS: There were eight consecutive patients after VS and eight after CAS, with femoral and pulmonary artery catheters in place. In each patient, five sequential fluid loading steps of 250 ml of colloid each were done. We measured central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) and, by transpulmonary thermodilution, cardiac index (CI) and global end-diastolic (GEDVI) and intrathoracic blood volume (ITBVI) indices. Fluid responsiveness was defined by a CI increase >5% or >10% per step. RESULTS: Global ejection fraction was lower and PAOP was higher after VS than CAS. In responding steps after VS (n=9-14) PAOP and volumes increased, while CVP and volumes increased in responding steps (n=12-19) after CAS. Baseline PAOP was lower in responding steps after VS only. Hence, baseline PAOP as well as changes in PAOP and volumes were of predictive value after VS and changes in CVP and volumes after CAS, in receiver operating characteristic curves. After VS, PAOP and volume changes equally correlated to CI changes. After CAS, only changes in CVP and volumes correlated to those in CI. CONCLUSIONS: While volumes are equally useful in monitoring fluid responsiveness, the predictive and monitoring value of PAOP is greater after VS than after CAS. In contrast, the CVP is of similar value as volume measurements in monitoring fluid responsiveness after CAS. The different value of pressures rather than of volumes between surgery types is likely caused by systolic left ventricular dysfunction in VS. The study suggests an effect of systolic cardiac function on optimal parameters of fluid responsiveness and superiority of the pulmonary artery catheter over transpulmonary dilution, for haemodynamic monitoring of VS patients.

Cardiac output derived from left ventricular pressure during conductance catheter evaluations: an extended Modelflow method.

OBJECTIVE: The Modelflow method computes cardiac output (CO) from arterial pressure (CO-MFao) by simulating a non-linear three-element Windkessel model of aortic input impedance. We present a novel technique to apply the Modelflow method to the left ventricular pressure (Plv) signal, to obtain an estimation of CO (CO-MFlv). METHODS: We extended the model by simulating the aortic valve as a resistance placed in series to the characteristic impedance. In our model the valve resistance is infinite in diastole, while it has a patient related value during systole. Twenty one patients with heart failure were studied with a combined pressure-conductance catheter positioned in the left ventricle and a micromanometer in the aorta. CO changes were induced during temporary sequential atrio-biventricular pacing with different atrio-ventricular and inter-ventricular intervals. After a single calibration we compared CO-MFlv with CO-MFao (516 measurement series) and with CO estimated by the conductance catheter volume technique (CO-cond) (267 series). RESULTS: CO ranged from 2.42 to 7.59 l/min with an overall mean of 4.36 (1.38) l/min. Comparing the two Modelflow methods, the bias was -0.04 (0.36) l/min, with limits of agreement of -0.77 and 0.70 l/min, and a coefficient of variation of 8.4%. Of the 516 changes in CO from baseline values, 112 were greater than 0.5 l/min and 110 of these (98%) were scored in the same direction by both methods. For comparisons between CO-MFlv and CO-cond the bias was -0.10 (0.49), with limits of agreement of -1.12 and 0.90 l/min, and a coefficient of variation of 12.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac output estimates by the modelflow method from aortic pressure and left ventricular pressure are interchangeable in patients without mitral and aortic abnormalities. After an initial calibration, CO-MFlv presents near zero bias and an adequate precision.

Beat-to-beat effects of intraaortic balloon pump timing on left ventricular performance in patients with low ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) timing errors during arrhythmia may result in afterload increases which may negatively influence left ventricular (LV) ejection and LV mechanical dyssynchrony. The aim of our study was to determine beat-to-beat effects of properly timed IABP, premature IAB inflation, and late IAB deflation on LV performance and LV mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: In 15 patients, LV pressure-volume relations and LV dyssynchrony were measured by conductance volume catheter. Properly timed IABP was evaluated at a 1:1 assist ratio within a 10 seconds time-span. Premature IAB inflation and late IAB deflation were evaluated at a 1:4 assist ratio. RESULTS: Properly timed 1:1 IABP acutely decreased LV end-systolic volume by 6.1% (p < 0.0001) and LV end-systolic pressure by 17.5% (p < 0.0001) due to decreased aortic impedance. Stroke volume (SV) increased by 14% (p < 0.0001), which correlated markedly with a decrease of LV mechanical dyssynchrony (p < 0.0001). The largest SV increases occurred in patients with lowest contractile state. Premature IAB inflation decreased SV by 20% (p < 0.0001) due to abrupt increase of LV afterload during late ejection. Late IAB deflation increased SV and stroke work by 18% (p < 0.0001) and 16% (p < 0.01) respectively, due to increased afterload during early ejection and decreased afterload during late ejection. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular performance during IABP is causally related to changes in LV afterload, and the timing of these changes in relation to contraction or relaxation phases, to LV mechanical dyssynchrony and to contractile state.

Automatic intraaortic balloon pump timing using an intrabeat dicrotic notch prediction algorithm.

PURPOSE: The efficacy of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) during arrhythmic episodes is questionable. A novel algorithm for intrabeat prediction of the dicrotic notch was used for real time IABP inflation timing control. DESCRIPTION: A windkessel model algorithm was used to calculate real-time aortic flow from aortic pressure. The dicrotic notch was predicted using a percentage of calculated peak flow. Automatic inflation timing was set at intrabeat predicted dicrotic notch and was combined with automatic IAB deflation. EVALUATION: Prophylactic IABP was applied in 27 patients with low ejection fraction (< 35%) undergoing cardiac surgery. Analysis of IABP at a 1:4 ratio revealed that IAB inflation occurred at a mean of 0.6 +/- 5 ms from the dicrotic notch. In all patients accurate automatic timing at a 1:1 assist ratio was performed. Seventeen patients had episodes of severe arrhythmia, the novel IABP inflation algorithm accurately assisted 318 of 320 arrhythmic beats at a 1:1 ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The novel real-time intrabeat IABP inflation timing algorithm performed accurately in all patients during both regular rhythms and severe arrhythmia, allowing fully automatic intrabeat IABP timing.

Breath-to-breath analysis of abdominal and rib cage motion in surfactant-depleted piglets during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of monitoring abdominal and rib cage tidal displacement as an indicator of optimal mean airway pressure (Paw) during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in a university research laboratory. ANIMALS: Eight piglets weighing 12.0+/-0.5 kg, surfactant depleted by lung lavage. INTERVENTIONS: Compliance of the respiratory system (C(rs)) was calculated from a quasistatic pressure volume loop. After initiation of HFOV lung volume was recruited by increasing Paw to 40 cmH(2)O. Then mean Paw was decreased in steps until PaO(2)/FIO(2) was below 100 mmHg. Proximal pressure amplitude remained constant. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Abdominal and rib cage tidal displacement was determined using respiratory inductive plethysmography. During HFOV there was maximum in tidal volume (Vt) in seven of eight piglets. At maximal mean Paw abdominal and rib cage displacement were in phase. Phase difference between abdominal and rib cage displacement increased to a maximum of 178+/-28 degrees at minimum mean Paw. A minimum in abdominal displacement and a maximum of Vt was found near the optimal mean Paw, defined as the lowest mean Paw where shunt fraction is below 0.1. CONCLUSIONS: During HFOV abdominal and rib cage displacement displayed mean Paw dependent asynchrony. Maximal Vt and minimal abdominal displacement coincided with optimal C(rs), oxygenation, and ventilation, suggesting potential clinical relevance of monitoring Vt and abdominal displacement during HFOV.