Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1682024 Jun 05.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888409

RESUMO

A 38-year-old woman with urosepsis and persistent unilateral hydronephrosis after antibiotic treatment. Antegrade pyelogram shows urine flow obstruction to the bladder. The whole ureter shows multiple small smooth-walled round lucent filling defects projecting into the lumen. The diagnosis ureteritis cystica was made.


Assuntos
Hidronefrose , Humanos , Feminino , Hidronefrose/etiologia , Hidronefrose/diagnóstico , Adulto , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/complicações , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Ureterais/diagnóstico , Doenças Ureterais/complicações
2.
PLoS One ; 15(4): e0229940, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32240185

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify the preventability, determinants and causes of unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge using a multidisciplinary approach and including patients' perspectives. DESIGN: A prospective cross-sectional single-center study. SETTING: Urban teaching hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 430 patients were included. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, discharged from one of seven participating clinical departments and an unplanned readmission within 30 days. METHODS: Residents from the participating departments individually assessed whether the readmission was caused by healthcare, the preventability and possible causes of readmissions using a tool. Thereafter, the preventability of the cases was discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting with residents of all participating departments and clinical pharmacists. The primary outcome was the proportion of readmissions that were potentially preventable. Secondary outcomes were the determinants for a readmission, causes for preventable readmissions, the change in the final decision on preventability after the multidisciplinary meeting and the value of patient interviews in assessing preventability. Differences in characteristics of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) and non-PPRs were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 430 readmissions, 56 (13%) were assessed as PPRs. Age was significantly associated with a PPR (adjusted OR: 2.42; 95%, CI 1.23-4.74; p = 0.01). The main causes for PPRs were diagnostic (30%), medication (27%) and management problems (27%). During the multidisciplinary meeting, the final decision on preventability changed in 11% of the cases. When a patient interview was available, it was used as a source of information to assess preventability in 26% of readmissions. In 7% of cases, the patient interview was mentioned as the most important source. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: 13% of readmissions were potentially preventable with diagnostic, medication or management problems being main causes. A multidisciplinary review approach and including the patient's perspective could contribute to a better understanding of the complexity of readmissions and possible improvements.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Hospitais Urbanos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Participação do Paciente
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...