Development of tools to facilitate the diagnosis of hereditary fructose intolerance.

Although hereditary fructose intolerance (HFI) is an inborn error of fructose metabolism that classically presents at infancy, the diagnosis is often missed or delayed. In this study, we aimed to develop tools to facilitate the diagnosis of HFI. The intake of fructose-containing food products, that is, fruit, fruit juice and sugar-sweetened beverages, was assessed by a 3-day food diary in adult HFI patients (n = 15) and age, sex, and BMI-matched controls (n = 15). Furthermore, glycosylation of transferrin was examined using high-resolution mass spectrometry and abnormally glycosylated transferrin was expressed as ratio of normal glycosylated transferrin. We found that the sensitivity and specificity of the 3-day food diary for the intake of at least one fructose-containing food product were both 100%. Both mono-glyco:diglyco transferrin and a-glyco+mono-glyco:di-glyco transferrin were greater in HFI patients and had a high-discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.97 and 0.94, respectively). In this well-characterized cohort of adult HFI patients, the 3-day food questionnaire and the glycosylation pattern of transferrin are valuable tools to facilitate the recognition and diagnosis of HFI in adult patients.

Quality of life of adult patients with hereditary fructose intolerance.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with hereditary fructose intolerance (HFI) generally have a good prognosis on a fructose-restricted diet, relatively little is known about their quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of life in adult patients with HFI in comparison to patients with dietary-treated, classical phenylketonuria (PKU). METHODS: Patients with HFI and patients with classical PKU were recruited from the adult metabolic centers in The Netherlands and Belgium and via social media. Patients were asked to fill out the 36-item Short Form Health survey (SF-36) and a modified PKU Quality Of Life (PKU-QoL) questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients with HFI (n = 19) did not report any restrictions in their health-related quality of life, except for vitality and general mental health, which were scored more unfavorable compared to patients with PKU (n = 19) (p < 0.05, adjusted for level of education and country of origin). The results from the modified PKU-QoL demonstrated a statistically significantly greater impact of the disease in the social domain in HFI. A substantial proportion of both HFI and PKU patients (21%) reported a great to severe emotional impact of their disease. Finally, patients with HFI experienced statistically significantly less food temptations, less guilt if dietary restrictions not followed, and less overall difficulty following dietary restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with HFI showed to have a generally good quality of life, they scored lower on vitality and general mental health, and reported a greater social impact of the disease. These aspects deserve further study and clinical attention.

Effects of fructose restriction on blood pressure: Secondary analysis of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite convincing animal data, there is an ongoing debate on whether and how fructose affects blood pressure in humans. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of fructose restriction on blood pressure, and the role of endothelial function herein. METHODS: forty-four overweight individuals were asked to follow a fructose-restricted diet (<7.5 g/meal and <10 g/day) for 6 weeks. They were randomly assigned to double-blind supplementation with glucose (=intervention group) or fructose (=control group) powder three times daily. Office blood pressure was measured with an automated device, and endothelial function was assessed by reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry, skin laser doppler flowmetry, and serum sE-selectin. RESULTS: Thirty-seven participants completed the study. Systolic blood pressure decreased significantly in the intervention group (change from baseline: -3.3 mmHg; 95%CI:-8.8,- 0.3), but this change was not statistically different from the control group. In contrast, diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly in the intervention group in comparison to controls (difference: -4.0 mmHg; 95%CI:-9.5,-0.5). Furthermore, the change in fructose intake was associated with the change in diastolic blood pressure (beta: 0.085 mmHg; 95% CI: 0.032;0.138). The endothelial markers were not affected by the intervention. Finally, the effects of the intervention on diastolic blood pressure appeared to be higher in individuals consuming high amounts of salt at baseline (difference: -9.0 mmHg; 95%CI:-14.5,-2.5). CONCLUSIONS: Six-week fructose restriction per se results in a dose-dependent decrease in diastolic blood pressure. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the effects of fructose restriction on salt-sensitive hypertension in humans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; NCT03067428.

Developing a patient portal for haematology patients requires involvement of all stakeholders and a customised design, tailored to the individual needs.

BACKGROUND: Electronic patient portals are increasingly being implemented, also in (haemato) oncology. However, portal usage is low and depends on user and provider engagement. We explored wishes, expectations and thoughts of patients with a haematologic malignancy and their physicians with regard to the electronic patient portal. METHODS: Based on insights from literature and a focus group discussion we built a 44-item questionnaire. This questionnaire was spread amongst patients with a haematologic malignancy at the outpatient clinic that was not yet exposed to patient portal facilities. Haematologists completed a questionnaire based on literature. RESULTS: Patients were interested in many different types of access to information and portal functionalities. However, their opinions varied about the provision of access to the portal to other people, the role of the physician, possibilities for communication via the portal and timing of access. The physicians acknowledged the relevance of the electronic patient portal, but had some worries about the patients' autonomous information handling, organizational and technical issues. Patients frequently expressed to be open about the potential of the patient portal to orchestrate their care. Nevertheless, most physicians appreciated their supporting role towards the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and physicians appreciated the electronic patient portal. Both groups need to be involved in further portal development to improve engagement by meeting patients' wishes, taking into account organizational and professional issues and managing expectations for both parties. To fit various patient profiles, portal design should be flexible and individualized. Further research should focus on the perceived added value and the impact on patient related outcome measures of portals.