Audit of an antibiotic policy and microbiological investigations for treating bacteraemia in a large teaching hospital.

An audit of different approaches to guide empirical therapy in 78 cases of bacteraemia revealed poor utilisation of the antibiotic policy with resulting inadequate (P=0.005) or excessive (P<0.00001) antibiotic treatment and a trend to increased mortality. Eighty-seven percent of blood cultures were positive on Gram-stain within 24 h but streamlined therapy was still judged excessive in 27%. The results show poor utilisation of an up-to-date antibiotic policy but confirm its potential benefits and the ability of traditional culture methods to guide antibiotic therapy in a useful time-scale.

Optimizing antibiotic therapy-the Aberdeen experience.

OBJECTIVE: To study the quality and continuity of treatment in the Acute Medicines Assessment Unit (AMAU) with regard to empirical prescription of antibiotics, mode of administration, adherence to ward antibiotic policy, as well as collection, awareness and utilization of microbiological investigations. METHODS: A prospective study over a 3-month period at the AMAU, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (ARI), a teaching hospital in north-eastern Scotland, was performed. The study included all patients started on empirical antibiotics on admission to the AMAU and followed up until their discharge. RESULTS: Of 1303 patients admitted, 221 (17%) were started on empirical antibiotics. This was in accordance with hospital antibiotic policy in 52% of cases. Appropriate specimens were taken from 77% of patients. Culture results showed that 29% (n = 65) of the patients had clinically significant growth of organisms. Of the 65 patients with clinically significant culture results, 49% (n = 32) were on an inappropriate empirical regimen. In 55%, the medication was not changed to a more appropriate antibiotic. In 72% of the patients with a negative culture, the culture report had no obvious effect on the duration or type of antibiotic being administered. Intravenous antibiotics were used in 60% of patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a significant overuse of antibiotics, especially intravenous forms, despite a paucity of positive sepsis parameters and chest X-ray findings in these patients The duration of treatment could be shortened and an early switch policy introduced if culture results and sepsis profiles were taken into consideration, as there was a large number of unproven infections. Suggestions are made about how these improvements in prescribing could be made within the current administrative set-up of AMAUs.

Trends in hospital antimicrobial prescribing after 9 years of stewardship.

Trends in antibiotic prescribing in Grampian have been monitored prospectively for 11 years from 1986 using computerized ward stock lists and laboratory data relating to all in-patient and out-patient treatments in all Grampian hospitals. The main outcome measures were the number of antibiotics available for routine and restricted use, annual expenditure and defined daily doses (DDDs) of high expenditure antimicrobial agents. An antibiotic committee introduced a policy and formulary in the third year of the study which has had only limited success in controlling prescribing. This report updates the audit from 1992/3 to 1996/7. During this period 22 new antibiotics were considered for inclusion in the hospital formulary. Seventeen, including seven antiretroviral agents, were incorporated, all for restricted use only. Despite this, expenditure on antibiotics has more than trebled since 1986/7 and increased 50% since 1992/3, two-thirds of the latter increase being due to the use of new drugs, namely anti-HIV drugs, lipid amphotericin derivatives and teicoplanin. Big increases in the use of co-amoxiclav, acyclovir, ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime account for the remainder of the increased expenditure. There was an overall increase of 16.9% in DDDs between 1992/3 and 96/7 to 424.0 DDDs/1000 patient days (393.4 DDDs for antibacterials). These findings highlight the current difficulty in controlling prescribing budgets, the increasing use of antibiotics and the consequent increase of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms.

Assessment of the efficacy, safety and quality of gentamicin use in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary.

Fifty-five patients who received od gentamicin were studied. The protocol for od gentamicin was followed in 23/55 (48%). Cure rates were 22/23 (96%) when the protocol was followed and 24/32 (75%) when not followed (P = 0.06). Toxicity was more common in those in whom the protocol was not followed (9/32; 28%) than in those in whom it was followed (1/23; 4%) (P< 0.05). The number needed to treat with the protocol to produce one additional cure was 4.84 (95% CI 2.64 to 28.66) and the number needed to treat to prevent one case of toxicity was 3.61 (95% CI 2.16 to 10.99).

Trends in hospital antibiotic prescribing after introduction of an antibiotic policy.

Trends in antibiotic prescribing in Grampian were monitored prospectively for seven years from 1986 using computerised ward stock lists and laboratory data relating to all in-patient and out-patient treatments in all Grampian hospitals serving a population of 500,000. The main outcome measures were the number of antibiotics available for routine and restricted uses, annual expenditure and defined daily doses (DDDs) of high expenditure antimicrobial agents. An antibiotic committee introduced a policy and formulary in the third year of the study which had only limited success in controlling prescribing. During the period of the study 30 new antibiotics were considered for inclusion in the hospital formulary, but only seven were incorporated, and all for restricted use only. Despite this, expenditure on antibiotics has more than doubled since 1986, two thirds of the increase being due to the use of new drugs. There was also an increased use of older antibiotics (DDDs increased by 33%), often for no clear reasons, and an overall increase of 46% in DDDs. Antibiotics have increased from 11.9-18.7% as a proportion of the drug budget. These findings highlight the current difficulty in controlling prescribing budgets, the increasing use of antibiotics and the consequent spread of resistance.

Grampian Health Board's joint drug formulary.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a model for creating a joint general practice-hospital formulary, using the example of ulcer healing drugs. DESIGN: A joint formulary development group produced draft guidelines based on an earlier hospital formulary, which were sent to interested local general practitioners for consultation. Revised guidelines were then drawn up and forwarded to the health board's medicines committee for approval and distribution. SETTING: Grampian Health Board. SUBJECTS: Nine members of joint formulary development group plus local general practitioners who were invited to comment on a list of 11 ulcer healing drugs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Degree of coincidence of drugs selected by hospital doctors and general practitioners. RESULTS: The ulcer healing drugs selected by the panel of general practitioners and by hospital doctors were highly coincident. The cost of one day's treatment with drugs varied considerably between hospital and general practice--for example, one drug cost 46p in hospital and 1 pounds in general practice and another cost 1.26 pounds in hospital and 1.01 pounds in general practice. Overall, six drugs cost more in hospital and five cost more in general practice. CONCLUSIONS: A joint formulary for use in hospitals and general practice in a health board can be devised fairly simply by consultation as virtually the same drugs are used in both types of practice. It should influence the health board's expenditure on drugs and affect the choice of drugs when a patient is discharged from hospital or is referred to any hospital in the region.