Comparison of the Use of Arterial Doppler Waveform Classifications in Clinical Routine to Describe Lower Limb Flow.

BACKGROUND: Characterisation of arterial Doppler waveforms is a persistent problem and a source of confusion in clinical practice. Classifications have been proposed to address the problem but their efficacy in clinical practice is unknown. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of the categorisation rate of Descotes and Cathignol, Spronk et al. and the simplified Saint-Bonnet classifications. METHODS: This is a multicentre prospective study where 130 patients attending a vascular arterial ultrasound were enrolled and Doppler waveform acquisition was performed at the common femoral, the popliteal, and the distal arteries at both sides. Experienced vascular specialists categorized these waveforms according to the three classifications. RESULTS: of 1033 Doppler waveforms, 793 (76.8%), 943 (91.3%) and 1014 (98.2%) waveforms could be categorized using Descotes and Cathignol, Spronk et al. and the simplified Saint-Bonnet classifications, respectively. Differences in categorisation between classifications were significant (Chi squared test, p < 0.0001). Of 19 waveforms uncategorized using the simplified Saint-Bonnet classification, 58% and 84% were not categorized using the Spronk et al. and Descotes and Cathignol classifications, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that the simplified Saint-Bonnet classification provides a superior categorisation rate when compared with Spronk et al. and Descotes and Cathignol classifications.

A systematic review of lower extremity electrical stimulation for treatment of walking impairment in peripheral artery disease.

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) induces an ischemic pain in the lower limbs and leads to walking impairment. Electrical stimulation has been used in patients with PAD, but no systematic review has been proposed to address the efficacy of the technique as a treatment for walking impairment in PAD. A systematic search was performed to identify trials focused on electrical stimulation for the treatment of walking impairment in patients with PAD in the Cochrane Central Register, PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science. Studies were included where the primary outcomes were pain-free walking distance and/or maximal walking distance. When appropriate, eligible studies were independently assessed for quality using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Five studies eligible for inclusion were identified, of which only two were randomized controlled studies. Trial heterogeneity prevented the use of the GRADE system and the implementation of a meta-analysis. Three types of electrical stimulation have been used: neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES, n = 3), transcutaneous electrical stimulation (n = 1), and functional electrical stimulation (n = 1). The two available randomized controlled studies reported a significant improvement in maximal walking distance (+40 m/+34% and +39 m/+35%, respectively) following a program of NMES. Owing to the low number of eligible studies, small sample size, and the risk of bias, no clear clinical indication can be drawn regarding the efficacy of electrical stimulation for the management of impaired walking function in patients with PAD. Future high-quality studies are required to define objectively the effect of electrical stimulation on walking capacity.

Using wearable monitors to assess daily walking limitations induced by ischemic pain in peripheral artery disease.

PURPOSE: To develop, assess the feasibility of, and determine the clinical validity of an event-based analysis method using wearable monitors to quantify walking pain manifestations (WPMs) and stops induced by walking pain (SIWPs) during daily life walking in people with peripheral artery disease (PAD). METHODS: The following two conditions were studied: a standardized outdoor walking session (OWS) and a seven-day free-living measurement (FLM) period. The PAD participants (n = 23) wore an accelerometer and a watch. They were asked to press the event marker button on the watch to indicate events related to WPMs and SIWPs. To assess the clinical validity of the method, the computed pain-free walking time (PFWT) and maximal walking time (MWT) were compared with the PFWT and MWT assessed using standard treadmill walking protocols, respectively. RESULTS: Following OWSs, the PFWT[OWS] and MWT[OWS] were significantly correlated with the PFWT[Strandness] (r = .955, P < .001) and MWT[Strandness] (r = .821, P < .001), respectively. During the FLM, PAD participants experienced only 2 WPMs/day and 1 SIWP/day, although severely limited on the treadmill and during the OWS. The average WPMs/day were moderately correlated with the PFWT[Strandness] (r = -.54, P = .016). The PFWT[FLM] was on average 12 times longer than the PFWT[Strandness] . Interestingly, the intensity of the walking bouts as assessed by the accelerometer counts during the FLM was significantly lower than that during the OWS (45 ± 15 vs 66 ± 20 counts/s, P < .001). CONCLUSION: This new method offers opportunities for studies investigating the experience of living with PAD and the assessment of daily life walking capacity for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

Effects of sildenafil on maximum walking time in patients with arterial claudication: The ARTERIOFIL study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) frequently experience claudication, a clinical symptom indicative of reduced walking capacity. Recommended care consists of exercise rehabilitation combined with optimal medical treatment and surgery. The effects of a single oral dose of sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor, on patients with claudication are discussed. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a single 100 mg dose of sildenafil compared to placebo in terms of maximal walking time (MWT) in patients with claudication. METHODS: The ARTERIOFIL study is a crossover, double-blind, prospective, randomized, single-center study conducted at Angers University Hospital in France. MWT (primary endpoint) was assessed using a treadmill test (10% incline; 3.2 km/h). Secondary endpoints (pain-free walking time (PFWT), transcutaneous oximetry during exercise and redox cycle parameters and safety) were also studied. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included of whom two were ultimately excluded. In the 12 remaining patients, the MWT was significantly improved during the sildenafil period compared with the placebo period (300 s [95% CI 172 s-428 s] vs 402 s [95% CI 274 s-529 s] p < 0.01). Sildenafil had no significant effect on pain-free walking time or skin tissue oxygenation during exercise. According to redox cycle parameters, sildenafil significantly reduced blood glucose and pyruvate levels and the 3-hydroxybutyrate/acetoacetate ratio, while there was no significant effect on lactate, 3-hydroxybutyrate, acetoacetate and free fatty acid levels. Symptomatic transient hypotension was observed in two women. CONCLUSIONS: The ARTERIOFIL study has shown that a single 100 mg oral dose of sildenafil had a significant effect on increase in MWT but had no significant effects on PFWT and oxygenation parameters in patients with claudication. A double-blind, prospective, randomized, multicenter study (VIRTUOSE©) is ongoing to evaluate the chronic effect of six month-long sildenafil treatment on MWT in PAD patients with claudication. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, registration. number: NCT02832570, (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02832570).

Impact of an Educational Intervention on Ankle-Brachial Index Performance Among Medical Students and Fidelity Assessment at Six Months.

BACKGROUND: The resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a clinical test to diagnose peripheral artery disease. The Wyatt's score has been proposed to assess the students' performance on ABI measurement on a healthy volunteer (HV). No study has shown that this score is sensitive to different teaching methods. In this randomized controlled trial, we wanted to determine whether didactic learning alone or didactic learning combined with experiential learning improves proficiency in the ABI procedure assessed by the Wyatt's score. METHODS: Medical students (n = 30) received a didactic learning, including (1) a presentation of the ABI guidelines and (2) a video demonstration. Each student was then randomized into 2 groups ("the no experiential learning group" and "the experiential learning group"). An initial evaluation was performed after the didactic learning and then the final evaluation at the end of the intervention. A student was considered to be proficient when he performed a correct ABI procedure on an HV. The correct procedure corresponds to the following: (1) correctly answered Wyatt's score and (2) a difference in the ABI measurement between a professor in vascular medicine and a student was ≤0.15. RESULTS: No student was proficient at the initial evaluation. At the final evaluation, there was a significant difference between the number of proficient students for the Wyatt's score depending on their learning group [didactic alone (1/10) or didactic + experiential training (15/20)] and also for the ABI procedure [didactic alone (0/10) or didactic + experiential training (16/20)]. At 6 months, among the 12 students who passed the final evaluation, 4 students passed both the Wyatt's score and the ABI measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the Wyatt's score was sensitive to an educational intervention and no improvement was found in the case of "no experiential learning." The Wyatt's score could be used to evaluate the student on ABI measurement after an educational intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Vascular Medicine Department of Rennes University Hospital (France). This was approved by the ethics review board of our institution (no. 16.150).

Description of Doppler waveforms to detect lower extremity peripheral artery disease.

Doppler waveforms analysis is a interesting to diagnose peripheral artery disease as suggested by the international recommendations. However as mentioned in the present letter, there is a lack of consensus about the terminology that should be used.

Performance of noninvasive laser Doppler flowmetry and laser speckle contrast imaging methods in diagnosis of Buerger disease: A case report.

RATIONALE: Buerger disease (BD) is a nonatherosclerotic, inflammatory, segmental vascular occlusive disease, which affects small and medium-sized arteries and veins and is triggered by substantial tobacco exposure. Angiographic findings consistent with BD are required for diagnosis. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) could represent potential noninvasive alternative techniques to angiography. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report the case of a 49-year-old smoker who developed an ischemic ulcer in the distal segment of the second finger of the left hand. He had no medical history. DIAGNOSES: In our vascular center, LDF and LSCI are conducted routinely for digital artery disease diagnosis. LDF was indicative of digital obstructive artery disease (DOAD). Postocclusive reactive hyperemia, assessed by LCSI, demonstrated no skin blood flow (SBF) perfusion in the distal phalanx of the thumb, index, middle, and auricular fingers. Angiography confirmed BD, showing distally located multisegmental vessel occlusion and corkscrew collaterals in this patient's hands. INTERVENTIONS: Ilomedine treatment was initiated and smoking cessation was definitive. OUTCOMES: Recently, the patient had an improvement in clinical condition despite the persistence of a small zone of necrosis of the left index finger 28 days post-treatment. LESSONS: Our observation suggests that where suspicion of BD is based on clinical criteria, combining LDF and LSCI could represent a noninvasive, safe means of reaching BD diagnosis. Further clinical trials are necessary to confirm this novel observation.

Heterogeneity of Doppler waveform description is decreased with the use of a dedicated classification.

BACKGROUND: The analysis of Doppler ultrasound waveforms (DW) provides a method for detecting and evaluating arterial stenosis in the lower limb arteries but no recommendation exists on how to describe the DWs. Aims of this study were to assess the heterogeneity of the description of DWs among vascular residents and the impact of the use of a 4-item classification. METHODS: Thirty different DWs were presented to residents using Microsoft PowerPoint® slides. They were invited to describe the 30 DWs before and after the presentation of a 4-item classification (triphasic, biphasic, monophasic, and others). The heterogeneity was assessed by the number of different answers used by the residents. Nineteen residents with six to eighteen months of vascular medicine training and ultrasound experience were included. RESULTS: The average of different answers was 9 ± 4 for the whole analysis of the 30 DWs without the use of a specific classification, whereas the average was 2 ± 1 using the 4-item classification (p < 0.005). There was a significant difference in correct answers, i. e. in combined continuous waveforms and pulsed waveforms between experienced residents and younger residents (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using a 4-item classification for DWs reduced the heterogeneity of the DW description. There is an urgent need to standardize the DW description in order to improve the patients care with peripheral artery disease.

Atherosclerosis knowledge - diagnosis and management in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis is the leading cause of death worldwide. Ischaemic stroke, coronary heart disease (CHD), and peripheral artery disease (PAD) are different forms of atherosclerotic disease. Knowledge among general practitioners (GPs) about the three main locations of atherosclerosis has never been conjointly explored in a single study. The aim of this survey was to compare GP awareness on the subject of these three different clinical presentations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2017 and May 2017, a self-administered survey was emailed to 18,500 French GPs. The questionnaire comprised three clinical cases involving cases of transient ischaemic attack (TIA), stable angina (SA), and intermittent claudication (IC). Each case was explored with seven similar questions. The primary endpoint was the number of physicians who correctly answered five questions for each clinical case. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1,724 GPs. TIA knowledge (48.2 %) was significantly higher than the SA knowledge (3.0 %) and IC knowledge (0.4 %). We also found a significant difference between SA knowledge and IC knowledge. The percentages of GPs who correctly diagnosed TIA, SA or IC were 96.7, 89.7, and 96.5 %, respectively (p < 0.0001). Poor knowledge ratings for all three locations were observed for inadequate prescription of supplementary investigations and treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that GPs' knowledge about atherosclerosis disease varies significantly depending on disease location. GPs diagnose correctly but need to be backed up for their management of patients with atherosclerosis.

Noninvasive Peripheral Artery Disease Screening Tools: A Deficient Knowledge among French Vascular Residents from 4 Medical Schools.

BACKGROUND: Ankle-brachial index (ABI) at rest, postexercise ABI, and toe-brachial index (TBI) are essential diagnostic tools recommended for peripheral artery disease (PAD) diagnosis. Our study investigates the level of knowledge on these 3 tests among vascular medicine residents from 4 French medical schools in France. METHODS: We included 19 vascular medicine residents in a cross-sectional study. During an annual obligatory seminar, all residents accepted to fill 3 questionnaires concerning knowledge about these 3 tests. RESULTS: All residents accepted to fill 3 questionnaires. None of the residents correctly knows how to perform all pressure measurements (ABI, postexercise ABI, and TBI). Two residents had the knowledge to perform the whole ABI at rest procedure, whereas no resident had the knowledge to perform neither the postexercise ABI (P = 0.48) nor the TBI (P = 0.48). Twelve residents correctly completed the question regarding the interpretation of ABI at rest, whereas 2 correctly completed the postexercise ABI question (P = 0.001) and 4 the TBI question (P = 0.02). The number of residents who have performed more than 20 measurements is higher regarding ABI at rest than postexercise ABI and TBI (84%, 5%, and 37% respectively; P < 0.001 and P = 0.006 respectively) and significantly less often in postexercise ABI than TBI (5% vs. 37%; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows for the first time that residents' knowledge of pressure measurements (resting-ABI, postexercise ABI, and TBI) of 4 French medical school are insufficient although the importance of pressure measurement has been strongly highlighted by the newly released PAD guidelines (2016) for PAD diagnosis.

[Diagnosis of lower limb peripheral artery disease]. / Artériopathie des membres inférieurs athéromateuse : diagnostic.

Lower limb peripheral artery disease is highly prevalent worldwide and in France. Three different stages can be found: asymptomatic stage, exercise ischemia stage, rest ischemia stage. This review based on current recommendations presents how to diagnose the different stages (Ankle brachial index, Toe-brachial index, oxymetry at rest and exercise oxymetry) in order to manage these patients.

How to become proficient in performance of the resting ankle-brachial index: Results of the first randomized controlled trial.

The resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a first-line test to diagnose peripheral artery disease (PAD). No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has yet been conducted to determine the best teaching method to become proficient in the ABI procedure. We conducted a monocentric RCT to determine whether didactic learning alone or didactic learning combined with experiential learning improved proficiency in the ABI procedure. Medical students ( n = 30) received didactic learning, including (i) a presentation of the ABI guidelines and (ii) a video demonstration. Each student was then randomized into two groups ('no experiential learning group' and 'experiential learning group'). An initial evaluation was performed after the didactic learning and a final evaluation at the end of the intervention. A student was considered to be proficient when he or she performed a correct ABI procedure on a healthy individual and a patient. The correct procedure corresponds to (i) following guidelines and (ii) a difference in ABI measurement between a vascular specialist and a student of ≤ 0.15. No student was proficient at the initial evaluation. At the final evaluation, in the didactic learning group, the number of proficient students was not improved compared with the initial evaluation (0/10 vs 1/10). In the experiential learning group, the number of proficient students was significantly improved (0/20 vs 11/20; p < 0.05). At the final evaluation, there was a significant difference between the number of proficient students depending on their learning group. In conclusion, didactic learning alone is insufficient to gain proficiency in the ABI procedure. Combining didactic learning with experiential learning significantly improved the students' proficiency.