Extending the course of intravenous antibiotics in adult patients with cystic fibrosis with acute pulmonary exacerbations.

Most severe pulmonary exacerbations (PExs) in adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are treated with 2 week of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. At occasions, the treatment is extended. The morbidity and the cost of extending the treatment are considerable. Risk factors and the outcome of extending the course of treatment have not been formally investigated. This was a prospective study. Decision to extend the course of antibiotics was made in patients who were not deemed to have responded to the initial 14 days of treatment. Risk factors examined for extending the course were site of treatment (home or hospital), CF symptom score, body mass index (BMI), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and C-reactive protein (CRP) at days 1 and 14 of the treatment. The following outcome measures were assessed for PExs requiring prolongation of treatment: FEV1, BMI, CF symptom score, CRP and number of days until the following PExs. PExs that were treated with 14 day course were used for comparison. Of all the PExs, 22.9% needed extension of treatment beyond day 14. Compared with PExs needing 14 days of antibiotics, CF symptom score, FEV1 and CRP at day 14 were worse in those who had to have the course extended. Extending the course of IV antibiotics to 21 days improved symptom score, but not any of the other outcome measures, including the number of days until the next PEx. Extending the course beyond 21 days did not result in improvement in any outcome measure. PExs in patients with worse lung disease and greater residual symptoms and lung inflammation at day 14 of antibiotic treatment were associated with the extension of the course of IV antibiotics. Prolonging the treatment to 21 days improved symptoms, but did not result in improvement in any other short-term or lung outcome measures.

Telemonitoring in chronic obstructive airway disease and adult patients with cystic fibrosis.

We compared the use of telemonitoring in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Seventy patients (51 CF and 19 COPD) were enrolled in two studies of six months' duration. Patients used a personal data assistant (PDA) attached to a spirometer to score symptoms and to perform daily spirometry. Criteria for diagnosis of exacerbations of COPD and CF were pre-defined. When exacerbations were detected, patients were offered treatment according to a pre-designed protocol. Thirty-two (63%) CF patients and one (5%) COPD patient withdrew from the studies due to lack of adherence to daily recording. For those who remained in the study, COPD patients recorded more study days (139) than CF patients (113), P = 0.03. The median number of exacerbations detected during the study was greater in COPD than in CF patients, although this was not significant. The median number of device-detected exacerbations in the COPD group was significantly greater than in the CF group, P = 0.024. When compared to a parallel period in the previous year, the number of hospitalisations for COPD exacerbations was reduced, whereas the number of intravenous antibiotics in CF patients did not differ. Adherence to telemonitoring was much greater for COPD than CF patients and the results appear to be more favourable for COPD patients than for CF patients.

Home intravenous antibiotic treatment for acute pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis - Is it good for the patient?

There is a worldwide drive for the home management of chronic respiratory diseases. With the widespread use of home intravenous (IV) treatment for cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations (PExs), evidence pointing to an inferior outcome of care for home-treated patients in comparison to hospital-treated patients is a cause of concern. Currently, patients who self-administer IV antibiotics at home are provided with equipment and instructions on the use of antibiotics. Policies vary; but in most UK centers, these patients are then followed up by the multidisciplinary team only on days 1, 7 and 14 of the treatment course. We aimed to review the current published literature in search for evidence for the value and the shortfalls of self-administered IV treatment at home for acute PExs in CF patients in comparison to conventional hospital treatment. We searched the electronic database system Medline for published papers regarding studies comparing home- and hospital-based IV antibiotic treatment for both adult and pediatric CF patients. Sixteen studies were identified and grouped into those that showed a similar outcome between home and hospital treatment and those that showed an inferior outcome for home management. Most studies were retrospective or inadequately powered to provide clear answers. Ideally, outcome of care for home treatment should be at least equal to outcome for hospital treatment. Extensive efforts should be made to standardize therapies preserving the advantages of home management and addressing the perceived reasons for an inferior outcome. Until further studies provide definitive answers, treatment at home should be reserved for adequately selected patients and individualized depending on the unique settings of each CF center and specific patients' requirements. There is great need for a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing home and hospital treatments in order to clarify this matter.