Statin treatment is not associated with an increased risk of adrenal insufficiency in real-world setting.

Introduction: Statins could reduce the synthesis of steroid hormones, thereby could cause adrenal insufficiency. We investigated this risk in a large nationwide database. Methods: We conducted a nested case-control study using a cohort of individuals affiliated to the French health insurance system in 2010, ≥18y and without adrenal insufficiency history. Each case had a first event of adrenal insufficiency between 2015 and 2017 and was matched to up to ten controls on age, sex, and prior treatment with corticosteroids. Statin exposure was measured over the five years preceding the index date, considering a six-month censoring lag-time. Association was estimated using a conditional logistic regression adjusted for confounders included in a disease risk score. Analyses were stratified on age, sex and corticosteroid history of use. Results: 4 492 cases of adrenal insufficiency were compared with 44 798 controls (median age 66y, 58% women), of which 39% vs. 33% were exposed to statins, respectively. No association between statin use and adrenal insufficiency was found when adjusting the model for confounders (adjusted odds ratio 0.98; 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.05). These results were consistent regardless of the exposure definition and stratifications considered. Conclusion: Statin-related adrenal insufficiency risk, if any, seems to be very limited and does not compromise the benefit of statin treatment.

Trajectories of Benzodiazepine Use among Older Adults from a Concordance-with-Guidelines Perspective: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Benzodiazepines (including zolpidem and zopiclone) are often associated with higher-than-recommended intake and durations of use, especially in older adults. The objective of this study was to characterize trajectories of benzodiazepine use according to recommended patterns in older adults, and to assess predictors of the risk of developing each of these trajectories. METHODS: Using the French Health Insurance database, we constituted a cohort of adults aged ≥ 65 years who initiated benzodiazepines in 2007 and were followed for up to 8 years. Concordance with benzodiazepine use guidelines was assessed on a quarterly basis according to a "concordance-with-guideline score" with values 1-5. Group-based trajectory modeling was then applied as implemented in the Proc Traj procedure in SAS to define guideline-concordant trajectories based on seven baseline patient-centered characteristics: sex, complementary health insurance coverage, treated alcohol and tobacco use disorder, polypharmacy, hospital stay, and registered chronic diseases. RESULTS: Among 5080 new users (64.1% women, median age 74 years), six trajectories of benzodiazepine use were identified. Three, representing 70% of users, were concordant with guidelines, whereas three implied non-concordant benzodiazepine use for part or all of the benzodiazepine use follow-up. Polymedicated patients were more prone to develop chronic non-guideline-concordant initially guideline-concordant use, whereas those with a history of long-term disease and hospitalization were more likely to develop chronic non-guideline-concordant use. The number of prescribers during the first quarter, number of daily defined doses, use of loperamide, and use of psychostimulants were associated with a higher risk of developing an initial and persistent non-guideline-concordant use. Treatment initiation by a psychiatrist, initial use of World Health Organization (WHO) step-2 opioids and non-benzodiazepine anxiolytics or sedatives were associated with a higher risk of late non-guideline-concordant use. CONCLUSIONS: Concordance with guidelines varied over time during benzodiazepine use in older adults. A third of these adults will hypothetically follow one of the identified non-guideline-concordant trajectories, consisting of initial and/or late non-guideline concordance. This was associated with modifiable and nonmodifiable factors that clinicians should be aware of for tailoring the monitoring of patients.

Risk of suicide attempt and suicide associated with benzodiazepine: A nationwide case crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies that found an association between benzodiazepines and suicidal behaviours were confounded by indication bias. AIMS: To limit this bias, a case crossover study (CCO) was conducted to estimate the risk of suicide attempt and suicide associated with benzodiazepines. METHOD: Patients ≥16 years, with hospitalised suicide attempt or suicide between 2013 and 2016, and at least one benzodiazepine dispensing within the 120 days before their act were selected in the nationwide French reimbursement healthcare system databases (SNDS). For each patient, frequency of benzodiazepine dispensing was compared between a risk period (days -30 to -1 before the event) and two matched reference periods (days -120 to -91, and -90 to -61). RESULTS: A total of 111,550 individuals who attempted suicide and 12,312 suicide victims were included, of who, respectively, 77,474 and 7958 had recent psychiatric history. Benzodiazepine dispensing appeared higher in the 30-day risk period than in reference ones. The comparison yielded adjusted odds ratios of 1.74 for hospitalised suicide attempt (95% confidence interval 1.69-1.78) and 1.45 for suicide (1.34-1.57) in individuals with recent psychiatric history, and of 2.77 (2.69-2.86) and 1.80 (1.65-1.97) for individuals without. CONCLUSION: This nationwide study supports an association between recent benzodiazepine use and both suicide attempt and suicide. These results strengthen the need for screening for suicidal risk carefully before initiation and during treatment when prescribing benzodiazepines. REGISTRATION NO: EUPAS48070 (http://www.ENCEPP.eu).