Butatrienes as extended alkenes: barriers to internal rotation and substitution effects on the stabilities of the ground states and transition states.

The barriers to internal rotation of methylated, ethynylated, and vinylated butatrienes and alkenes were calculated at the CASPT2/6-31G(d)//B3LYP/6-31G(d) level. Calculated butatriene rotational barriers are lower than those of analogous alkenes, but there is a larger variance in rotational barrier for alkenes than for butatrienes. The barriers to rotation were analyzed by isodesmic equations designed to estimate the substituent effects in the ground (GS) and transition (TS) states individually. The GSs of both series are stabilized to roughly the same extent. In contrast, the TSs of butatrienes are more stabilized overall than those of alkenes. Much of the stabilization in the TS of butatrienes comes from the internal triple bond and not from the substituent. Estimation of the substituent stabilization alone reveals the TSs of ethylenes to be more stabilized by substitution than butatrienes.

How large is the conjugative stabilization of diynes?

The conjugation stabilization energies of dienes and diynes are considerably larger than estimates based on heat of hydrogenation differences between 1,3-butadiyne and 1-butyne as well as between 1,3-butadiene and 1-butene. Such comparisons do not take into account the counterbalancing hyperconjugative stabilization of the partially hydrogenated products by their ethyl groups. When alkyl hyperconjugation is considered, the conjugation stabilization of diynes ( approximately 9.3 kcal/mol) is found by two methods (involving isomerization of nonconjugated into conjugated isomers and heats of hydrogenation) to be larger than that of dienes ( approximately 8.2 kcal/mol).