[Current status of total hip and knee replacements in Germany - results of a nation-wide survey]. / Aktueller Status der Hüft- und Knieendoprothetik in Deutschland - Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Umfrage.

BACKGROUND: Total hip and knee replacements are very frequently performed operative procedures in German hospitals. Despite the high number of cases, only few data on treatment procedures of the clinical routine and their impact on postoperative length of stay and clinical outcome are available. The aim of our survey was to gain detailed insights of the treatment procedures in patients scheduled for elective hip or knee replacement in order to extract recommendations for improving patient care. METHODS: In a nation-wide survey, we asked leading physicians of 694 trauma surgery and orthopaedic surgery departments and their corresponding colleagues in the departments of anaesthesia for treatment procedures including the process of patient admission, surgical techniques, postoperative analgesia, discharge management and follow-up. We used a multiple linear regression for analysing variables impacting on the postoperative length of stay. RESULTS: Altogether, 303 replies representing 31.8 % of the contacted hospitals could be evaluated. For hip arthroplasty, the anterolateral approach was most commonly chosen. For knee arthroplasty, the parapatellar approach was most frequently used. Tourniquet and wound drainage (mostly removed on the second postoperative day) were widely used with more than 90 %. The avoidance of wound drainage was associated with a lower postoperative length of stay for patients following total hip or knee replacement. Only 70 % of the German departments followed up their patients after discharge checking especially the range of motion of the artificial joint replacement. CONCLUSION: The treatment procedures for elective hip and knee replacement are very heterogeneous in German hospitals. The quality of the clinical outcome cannot be related to a single procedure; in fact the choice and complementary interaction of interventions are essential for improving patient care. These results provide first important evidence to which extent organisational structures and treatment procedures affect patient care and length of stay. Therefore, the analyses show relevant indications for an optimised standard in patient care.

Prevention and treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in Europe (and the world) and has become the standard procedure for the management of symptomatic cholelithiasis or acute cholecystitis in patients without specific contraindications. Bile duct injuries (BDI) are rare but serious complications that can occur during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Prevention and management of BDI has given rise to a host of publications but very few recommendations, especially in Europe. METHODS: A systematic research of the literature was performed. An international expert panel was invited to appraise the current literature and to develop evidence-based recommendations. Statements and recommendations were drafted after a consensus development conference in May 2011, followed by presentation and discussion at the annual congress of the EAES held in Torino in June 2011. Finally, full guidelines were consented and adopted by the expert panel via e-mail and web conference. RESULTS: A total of 1,765 publications were identified through the systematic literature search and additional submission by panellists; 671 publications were selected as potentially relevant. Only 46 publications fulfilled minimal methodological criteria to support Clinical Practice Guidelines recommendations. Because the level of evidence was low for most of the studies, most statements or recommendations had to be based on consensus of opinion among the panel members. A total of 15 statements and recommendations were developed covering the following topics: classification of injuries, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, and management of BDI. CONCLUSIONS: Because BDI is a rare event, it is difficult to generate evidence for prevention, diagnosis, or the management of BDI from clinical studies. Nevertheless, the panel has formulated recommendations. Due to the currently limited evidence, a European registry should be considered to collect and analyze more valid data on BDI upon which recommendations can be based.