RESUMO
A 76-year-old gentleman presented with persistent lower urinary tract symptoms. Multiple biopsies, radiological correlation and ancillary studies were required to achieve a diagnosis. The main differential diagnoses lies between urothelial carcinoma and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), both of which are known to be positive for p63 and GATA3. An accurate diagnosis is crucial as the management is significantly different. To avoid misdiagnosis a comprehensive immunohistochemistry panel is necessary. Primary bladder lymphomas are rare. Our case represents the first case of primary ALK-negative TP63-rearranged ALCL. We reviewed the literature and discussed the potential pitfalls for misdiagnosis.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/diagnóstico , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/genética , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patologia , Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/genética , Receptores Proteína Tirosina Quinases/genética , Erros de Diagnóstico , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Proteínas Supressoras de TumorRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Low-grade chronic inflammation has been suggested to play a role in uncomplicated asymptomatic and symptomatic diverticular disease. However, population-based studies are lacking. We investigated whether community participants with diverticulosis, with or without symptoms, would have colonic inflammation on histology and serology. METHODS: In a nested case-control study of 254 participants from the population-based colonoscopy (PopCol) study, colonic histological inflammatory markers and serological C-reactive protein levels were analyzed in cases with diverticulosis and controls without diverticulosis. Statistical methods included logistic and linear regression models. RESULTS: Background variables including age (P = 0.92), sex (P = 1.00), body mass index (P = 0.71), smoking (P = 0.34), and recent antibiotic exposure (P = 0.68) were similar between cases and controls. Cases reported more abdominal pain (P = 0.04) and diarrhea symptoms (mushy and high-frequency stools) than controls (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively) but were otherwise similar. The median C-reactive protein levels were similar among cases and controls [1.05 mg/L (0.3, 2.7) vs 0.8 (0.4, 2.2), P = 0.53]. There was a trend of increased numbers of cecal lymphoid aggregates in cases vs controls (P = 0.07), but no other associations between diverticulosis and inflammatory markers on histology were found. Similarly, no serological or mucosal inflammation was associated with symptomatic cases of diarrhea or abdominal pain vs asymptomatic controls. CONCLUSIONS: In a general community sample, both asymptomatic and symptomatic diverticulosis are not associated with colonic mucosal inflammation. Other explanations for symptomatic colonic diverticulosis need to be identified.
