Sources of exposure and risk among employees infected with severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a large, urban, tertiary-care hospital in the United States.

Objective: Hospital employees are at risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection through transmission in 3 settings: (1) the community, (2) within the hospital from patient care, and (3) within the hospital from other employees. We evaluated probable sources of infection among hospital employees based on reported exposures before infection. Design: A structured survey was distributed to participants to evaluate presumed COVID-19 exposures (ie, close contacts with people with known or probable COVID-19) and mask usage. Participants were stratified into high, medium, low, and unknown risk categories based on exposure characteristics and personal protective equipment. Setting: Tertiary-care hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. Participants: Hospital employees with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test result between March 2020 and January 2021. During this period, 573 employees tested positive, of whom 187 (31.5%) participated. Results: We did not detect a statistically significant difference in the proportion of employees who reported any exposure (ie, close contacts at any risk level) in the community compared with any exposure in the hospital, from either patients or employees. In total, 131 participants (70.0%) reported no known high-risk exposure (ie, unmasked close contacts) in any setting. Among those who could identify a high-risk exposure, employees were more likely to have had a high-risk exposure in the community than in both hospital settings combined (odds ratio, 1.89; P = .03). Conclusions: Hospital employees experienced exposure risks in both community and hospital settings. Most employees were unable to identify high-risk exposures prior to infection. When respondents identified high-risk exposures, they were more likely to have occurred in the community.

Relationships Between First Metatarsal and Sesamoid Positions and Other Clinically Relevant Parameters for Hallux Valgus Surgery.

Relationships between hallux valgus (HV) and other measurements within the first ray have been extensively studied. It is becoming more popular to correct HV deformity with tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis while internally (varus) rotating the first metatarsal. This, in turn, reduces the sesamoid position when viewed in the dorsoplantar projection on radiographs. However, it has been shown that not all HV deformities have pathological external (valgus) rotation of the first metatarsal. In this study, we explored the relationships between frontal-plane rotations of the first metatarsal as well as the sesamoids, and other factors not limited to the first ray, to better understand the pathological process of HV deformity and to assist in surgical planning. We found that when adjusting for these covariates, the only factor associated with first metatarsal external rotation was having less metatarsus adductus. Sesamoid rotation, on the other hand, was independently associated with the HV angle, tibial sesamoid position, and medial column collapse. When surgically treating HV, correction of sesamoid rotation may need to be prioritized.