Outcomes of Percutaneous Revascularization in Severe Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article presents a comprehensive review of coronary revascularization versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with severe ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. RECENT FINDINGS: The REVIVED-BCIS2 trial randomized 700 patients with extensive coronary artery disease and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and viability in more than four dysfunctional myocardial segments to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus OMT versus OMT alone. Over a median duration of 41 months, there was no difference in the composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or improvement in LVEF with PCI plus OMT versus OMT alone at 6 and 12 months, quality of life scores at 24 months, or fatal ventricular arrhythmia. The STICH randomized trial was conducted between 2002 and 2007, involving patients with LV dysfunction and coronary artery disease. The patients were assigned to either CABG plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone. At the 5-year follow-up, the trial showed that CABG plus medical therapy reduced cardiovascular disease-related deaths and hospitalizations but no reduction in all-cause mortality. However, a 10-year follow-up showed a significant decrease in all-cause mortality with CABG. The currently available evidence showed no apparent benefit of PCI in severe ischemic cardiomyopathy as compared to OMT, but that CABG improves outcomes in this patient population. The paucity of data on the advantages of PCI in this patient population underscores the critical need for optimization of medical therapy for better survival and quality of life until further evidence from RCTs is available.

Water Lung: An Interesting Case of Non-cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema in a Heart Failure Patient.

Contrast-induced pulmonary edema is a rare but life-threatening condition often missed in heart failure patients. We present a case of a 65-year-old female with a past medical history of coronary artery disease, diastolic heart failure, and chronic kidney disease who presented with chest pain. She received low osmolar intravenous (IV) contrast for cardiac catheterization. Within 24 hours of receiving the contrast, the patient developed respiratory distress, which was found to be secondary to pulmonary edema. Pulmonary edema was considered to be related to cardiogenic at first; however, the patient's physical examination was normal, with no jugular venous distention (JVD). A transthoracic echocardiogram showed a central venous pressure of 3 mmHg. The patient's respiratory condition improved after receiving an IV diuretic. Chart review showed that the patient had a similar presentation in the past, which was also thought to be related to heart failure leading to recurrent exposure to contrast. Non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary edema in heart failure patients receiving contrast.

Lp(a) and risk of cardiovascular disease - A review of existing evidence and emerging concepts.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death among adults in the United States. There has been significant advancement in the diagnosis and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and its underlying risk factors. In certain populations, there remains a significant residual risk despite adequate lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and control of traditional risk factors. This has led to an interest in research to identify additional risk factors that contribute to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] has been identified as an independent risk factor contributing to an increased risk for CVD. There are also ethnic and racial disparities in Lp(a) inheritance that need to be understood. This paper reviews the current literature on lipoprotein a, proposed mechanisms of actions for cardiovascular disease, recommendations for testing, and the current and emerging therapies for lowering Lp(a).

COVID-19 infection characteristics and outcomes in a predominantly Latino community hospital.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has rapidly spread worldwide and claimed millions of lives. Several studies have attempted to understand the relationship between COVID-19 infection and health disparities. The aim of the current work was to evaluate the pre-admission health characteristics, symptomatology, diagnostic abnormalities, treatment measures and clinical outcomes of the community served by our institution, with a sub-analysis of our Hispanic community. Methods: This is a single-center, cross-sectional cohort study of patients with COVID-19 admitted from 15 March 2020 to 30 April 2020 to MacNeal Hospital. A retrospective chart review was performed including patients >18 years and a positive nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR. Demographical data, comorbidities, clinical data, treatment regimen, and patient outcomes were collected. Results: A total of 257 patients were included in the study of which 60.4% were identified as Hispanic. The median age at admission of Hispanic patients was significantly lower compared to non-Hispanic patients (56.6 vs. 65.7 years, p<0.01). Non-Hispanic patients had lower prevalence of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and chronic lung disease. Most common at presentation were shortness of breath (69.6%), cough (69.2%), and fever (64%). Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (53.6%). Approximately 89% of the patients received antibiotics, 40.4% hydroxy-chloroquine, 13.2% steroids, and 6% tocilizumab. Twenty six percent required mechanical ventilation (MV), and over half of them (56.7%) were Hispanic. The strongest factors associated with MV were smoking (OR 2.97, 95%CI 1.01-8.69), CRP >10 mg/dL (OR 4.53, 95%CI 1.49-13.38) and D-dimer >1.5 mcg/mL (OR 3.63, 95%CI 1.31-10.05). An oxygen saturation of >90% on room air on presentation was a protective factor when predicting intubation (OR 0.11, 95%CI 0.03-0.33). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 17.1% (n=44); 11.9% in the Hispanic group vs 26.3% in the non-Hispanic group (p<0.003). Conclusions: Our review of consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19 demonstrated that over half of patients were of Hispanic descent. Interestingly enough, despite being significantly younger and healthier, the need for mechanical ventilation in the Hispanic group was not significantly different compared to the non-Hispanic group. However, the Hispanic group had a lower mortality rate.

Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Outcomes in Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2.

Cardiovascular involvement is one of the end-organ complications commonly reported in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It has also been postulated to be an independent risk factor for increased mortality in COVID-19-infected patients. With such a significant effect of COVID-19 on the cardiovascular system and vice versa, it is pivotal for physicians to observe this association closely for improving management and understanding prognosis in these patients. Here, we present three patients and describe their baseline cardiac risk factors, the cardiac complications they developed in association with COVID-19 infection, and their varying outcomes.

Statins and the potential for higher diabetes mellitus risk.

Introduction: 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) are widely used for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Long-term use of statins has been linked to the development of diabetes mellitus (DM) which increases CVD risk. Areas covered: We discussed the reported incidence of DM in statin users, various possible mechanisms responsible for the development of DM and the clinical implications of this association on CVD risk. Relevant supporting literature was identified using MEDLINE/EMBASE search. Expert opinion: Data from available RCTs and observational studies suggest a 10-45% higher risk of new-onset DM with statin use compared to nonusers. Several cellular, molecular, and genetic mechanisms, and lifestyle changes have been studied and discussed as potential underlying mechanisms responsible for this elevated DM risk with statin therapy. The mode of the diabetogenic action of statins is still unclear and an interplay of pancreatic and peripheral effects in the pathogenesis of DM is a possibility. Despite these observations, the CVD preventative benefit of statin treatment outweighs the CVD risk associated with of development of new DM. There is a need for further research to identify the exact mechanisms involved so as to specifically target causative factors and individualize treatment.