Differential effects of hydroxamate inhibitors on PMA and ligand-induced L-Selectin down-modulation: role of membrane proximal and cytoplasmic domains.

L-selectin is down-modulated from the cell surface in response to leukocyte activation or cross-linking with ligand mimetics such as anti-L-selectin antibodies or sulfatides. The down-modulation induced upon cellular activation with PMA is due to proteolytic shedding mediated by a cysteine metalloprotease, presumably the TNF-alpha converting enzyme (TALE), and is susceptible to inhibitors of the hydroxamate class. To determine if cross-linking-induced down-modulation of L-selectin is similarly affected by these inhibitors, we exposed Jurkat T cells to the anti-L-selectin antibody Dreg 200 or sulfatides in the presence of the hydroxamate TNF-alpha protease inhibitor (TAPI). TAPI completely inhibited PMA-induced downmodulation but had no effect on that induced by the anti-L-selectin antibody or sulfatides. The downmodulation induced by an anti-TCR antibody (WT31) was only partially inhibited by TAPI. An L-selectin mutant lacking the putative TACE cleavage site and resistant to PMA-induced shedding (321del.9) was expressed in L1.2 pre-B cells. Like WT L-selectin, this mutant was down-modulated when exposed to sulfatides, or Dreg 200 and this down-modulation was unaffected by TAPI. An L-selectin cytoplasmic tail deletion mutant (344del.15) expressed in L1.2 pre-B cells was down-modulated by PMA or sulfatides, but not Dreg 200. Electrophoretic analysis of L-selectin immunoprecipitated from the supernatants of Jurkat cells treated with either sulfatides or D200 revealed a proteolytic fragment of the same size as that released from the cell surface in response to PMA. Our data indicate that the down regulation of L-selectin in response to cross-linking by ligands or TCR engagement may be mechanistically distinct from that induced by PMA. Furthermore, our results with the 344del.15 mutant suggest that the down-modulation of Lselectin induced by certain sulfated carbohydrate ligands may be initiated through surface receptors other than L-selectin itself. The abbreviations used in this paper are: TAPI, TNF-alpha protease inhibitor; TACE, TNF-alpha converting enzyme; PMA, 4(3-phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate.

Protease-resistant L-selectin mutants. Down-modulation by cross-linking but not cellular activation.

The adhesion molecule L-selectin (CD62L) is rapidly shed from the plasma membrane during leukocyte activation as a result of proteolytic cleavage between Lys321 and Ser322 within the extracellular domain. L-selectin is also down-modulated from the surface in response to cross-linking, possibly through a similar mechanism. To further characterize the mechanism of down-modulation, several L-selectin mutants were generated and transfected into COS cells. Wild-type L-selectin as well as mutants with one or two amino acid substitutions at the cleavage site were nearly quantitatively shed into the culture supernatant. However, mutants in which a nine-amino acid stretch that included the protease-sensitive site was either deleted or replaced with a polyglycine spacer or a comparable region of E-selectin were retained on the cell surface and not detected in the supernatant. These results are consistent with other reports describing protease resistant L-selectin mutants. We also demonstrate that when expressed in L1-2 pre-B cells, the L-selectin nine-amino acid deletion mutant (321del.9), but not wild-type L-selectin, is resistant to down-regulation induced by PMA. However, both wild-type and mutant 321del.9 are completely lost from the cell surface in response to cross-linking with an L-selectin Ab. PMA-induced- but not L-selectin cross-linking-induced down-modulation was inhibited by staurosporine. These data are consistent with the idea that the L-selectin protease(s) can tolerate minor structural alterations at the cleavage site, and that L-selectin down-modulation can be induced by more than one mechanism, at least one of which (cross-linking) is protein kinase C independent.

Activation of arachidonic acid metabolism in mouse macrophages by bacterial amphiphiles.

The relative activities of lipoteichoic acid (LTA) from four Gram-positive bacteria were compared to different lipopolysaccharide (LPS) preparations for activation of arachidonic acid metabolism in mouse peritoneal macrophages. Total eicosanoid was determined in cultures labeled with [3H]-arachidonic acid. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and leukotriene C4 (LTC4) were determined by EIA analysis. The relative potencies of the different preparations were: smooth LPS from Salmonella abortus > or = Re-LPS from Salmonella minnesota (R-595) > or = LTA from Streptococcus pyogenes approximately Streptococcus faecalis approximately Staphylococcus aureus > or = monophosphoryl lipid A derived from the Re-LPS >> LTA from Bacillus subtilis. Activation of eicosanoid release was inhibited by staurosporin for all of the amphiphiles tested. Treatment of the macrophage cultures with LTA from S. pyogenes, S. faecalis, and S. aureus, either in the presence or absence of indomethacin, desensitized the cells to eicosanoid release on subsequent challenge with LPS. The desensitized cells remained responsive to the phorbol ester phorbol myristate acetate. LPS from Gram-negative bacteria has immunostimulatory and endotoxic activities which result, in part, from the release of eicosanoids and other mediators from activated macrophages. The similarities in the patterns of cell activation by LPS and LTA suggest that lipoteichoic acids might contribute to the pathogenicities of Gram-positive bacteria.