The Kinetics of Humoral and Cellular Responses after the Booster Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine in Inflammatory Arthritis Patients.

Impaired immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccinations in inflammatory arthritis (IA) patients results in diminished immunity. However, optimal booster vaccination regimens are still unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the kinetics of humoral and cellular responses in IA patients after the COVID-19 booster. In 29 IA patients and 16 healthy controls (HC), humoral responses (level of IgG antibodies) and cellular responses (IFN-γ production) were assessed before (T0), after 4 weeks (T1), and after more than 6 months (T2) from the booster vaccination with BNT162b2. IA patients, but not HC, showed lower anti-S-IgG concentration and IGRA fold change at T2 compared to T1 (p = 0.026 and p = 0.031). Furthermore, in IA patients the level of cellular response at T2 returned to the pre-booster level (T0). All immunomodulatory drugs, except IL-6 and IL-17 inhibitors for the humoral and IL-17 inhibitors for the cellular response, impaired the immunogenicity of the booster dose at T2. Our study showed impaired kinetics of both humoral and cellular responses after the booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine in IA patients, which, in the case of cellular response, did not allow the vaccination effect to be maintained for more than 6 months. Repetitive vaccination with subsequent booster doses seems to be necessary for IA patients.

Humoral and cellular immunogenicity of COVID-19 booster dose vaccination in inflammatory arthritis patients.

Introduction: Previous studies have shown a reduction in the effectiveness of primary COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases. However, limited data is available regarding the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine booster dose, especially on cellular response. The study aimed to assess the humoral and cellular immunogenicity of a booster dose in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA). Patients and methods: 49 IA and 47 age and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) were included in a prospective cohort study. Both groups completed primary COVID-19 vaccination and after more than 180 days received a BNT162b2 booster shot. Humoral responses (level of IgG antibodies) and cellular responses (IFN-γ production) were assessed before and after 4 weeks from the booster dose of the vaccine. Results: After the booster dose, all participants showed an increased humoral response, although significantly reduced antibody levels were observed in IA patients compared to HC (p=0.004). The cellular response was significantly lower both before (p<0.001) and after (p<0.001) the booster dose in IA patients as compared to HC. Among the immunomodulatory drugs, only biological and targeted synthetic drugs lowered the humoral response after booster vaccination. However, the cellular response was decreased after all immunomodulatory drugs except IL-17 inhibitors and sulfasalazine. Conclusion: Our data indicate that patients with rheumatic diseases present lower humoral and cellular responses after the COVID-19 booster vaccine in comparison to HC. This may translate into a recommendation for subsequent booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine for rheumatic patients.

S100A8 and S100A12 Proteins as Biomarkers of High Disease Activity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis That Can Be Regulated by Epigenetic Drugs.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune chronic inflammatory disease that is still not well understood in terms of its pathogenesis and presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Monocytes are key players in initiating and maintaining inflammation through the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and S100 proteins in RA. This study aimed to test a specific DNA methylation inhibitor (RG108) and activator (budesonide) in the regulation of pro-inflammatory mediators-especially the S100 proteins. We also searched for new biomarkers of high disease activity in RA patients. RNA sequencing analysis of healthy controls (HCs) and RA monocytes was performed. Genes such as the S100 family, TNF, and IL-8 were validated by qRT-PCR following DNA-methylation-targeted drug treatment in a monocytic THP-1 cell line. The concentrations of the S100A8, S100A11, and S100A12 proteins in the sera and synovial fluids of RA patients were tested and correlated with clinical parameters. We demonstrated that RA monocytes had significantly increased levels of S100A8, S100A9, S100A11, S100A12, MYD88, JAK3, and IQGAP1 and decreased levels of IL10RA and TGIF1 transcripts. In addition, stimulation of THP-1 cells with budesonide statistically reduced the expression of the S100 family, IL-8, and TNF genes. In contrast, THP-1 cells treated with RG108 had increased levels of the S100 family and TNF genes. We also revealed a significant upregulation of S100A8, S100A11, and S100A12 in RA patients, especially in early RA compared to HC sera. In addition, protein levels of S100A8, S100A11, and S100A12 in RA synovial fluids compared to HC sera were significantly increased. Overall, our data suggest that the S100A8 and S100A12 proteins are strongly elevated during ongoing inflammation, so they could be used as a better biomarker of disease activity than CRP. Interestingly, epigenetic drugs can regulate these S100 proteins, suggesting their potential use in targeting RA inflammation.

Interactions between two enantiomers of losigamone and conventional antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock model--an isobolographic analysis.

The aim of this study was the isobolographic evaluation of interactions between two enantiomers of losigamone, AO-242 [(+)-5(R)-alpha(S)-5-(2-chlorophenylhydroxymethyl)-4-methoxy-2(5H)-furanone] and AO-294 [(-)-5(S)-alpha(R)-5-(2-chlorophenylhydroxymethyl)-4-methoxy-2(5H)-furanone], and valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, or phenobarbital in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Both enantiomers interacted additively with conventional antiepileptic drugs at all studied fixed dose ratios (1:3, 1:1, 3:1). Furthermore, AO-242, AO-294 and antiepileptics applied alone, as well as combinations of enantiomers and antiepileptics did not affect motor performance in the chimney test. Significant impairment of long-term memory (passive-avoidance task) was noted only in the case of valproate alone, given at the dose equal to its median effective dose (ED(50)) against maximal electroshock. All other antiepileptics and their combinations with AO-242 or AO-294 did not impair memory of mice. Enantiomers did not affect the brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs, indicating a pharmacodynamic nature of the observed interactions. In conclusion, the present results suggest both AO-242 and AO-294 as promising candidate drugs in the add-on therapy of refractory epilepsy.

Serum leptin in rheumatoid arthritis.

Leptin is a peptide hormone that has an essential role in the regulation of body weight by inhibiting food intake and stimulating energy expenditure. The role of leptin in the modulation of the immune response and inflammation has been regarded as important. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients it was reported that fasting leads to an improvement of clinical and biological measures of disease activity, which was associated with a marked decrease in serum leptin. These features suggest that leptin may also influence the inflammatory mechanisms of arthritis in humans. In this study we assessed serum leptin levels in RA and osteoarthritis (OA) patients and found a correlation between serum leptin level and other markers as well as bone mass density changes, activity of disease, disease duration and the age of the patients. The blood was collected from 30 RA and 30 OA patients who constituted the control group. Serum leptin level was determined using the DRG Leptin ELISA Kit-a solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on the sandwich principle. The serum level of leptin in RA patients ranged from 1.8 to 81.1 ng/ml and median value was 11.2. There was a positive correlation between body mass index (BMI) of RA patients and serum level of leptin (correlation coefficients Spearman's r = 0.81). According to correlation coefficients, serum leptin level is independent of age of RA patients, stage of disease, number of painful and swollen joints, duration of morning stiffness, disease duration as well as value of titre of the Waaler-Rose, disease activity score (DAS 28) value and presence of rheumatoid nodules. There was a negative correlation between serum leptin level and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). No correlation between the serum leptin level and T-score was found. An influence of steroid treatment on the serum leptin level was not shown. The median serum leptin level in OA patients was 9.2 ng/ml. There was a positive correlation between body mass index of OA patients and serum level of leptin (correlation coefficients Spearman's r = 0.57). No correlation was found between serum leptin level and patient's age, duration of disease and value of laboratory data. There were no correlations between serum leptin level and visual analogue pain scale (VAS) for the lower-limb afflicted patients as well as stage of disease according to Kellgren and Lawrence's score in OA patients. There was a negative correlation between serum leptin level and T-score value in OA patients (r = -0.58, P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between serum leptin levels for RA and OA patients.

Isobolographic analysis of interactions among losigamone analog AO-620 and two conventional antiepileptic drugs.

In the present study, we investigated pharmacodynamic interactions among AO-620, a losigamone analog, and two conventional antiepileptic drugs, valproate (VPA) and phenobarbital (PB). Experiments were conducted in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Isobolographic analysis of the obtained data revealed pure additive interactions between AO-620 and PB applied at three dose ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1. Antagonism was observed when AO-620 was co-administered with VPAat the ratio of 3:1, while additive interactions were seen in two remaining proportions (1:3 and 1:1). Surprisingly, the interaction pattern of AO-620 appeared quite different from that of losigamone.