Impact of a pediatric oncology nutrition program: Lessons learnt over a decade.

BACKGROUND: The management of malnutrition in children with cancer remains a challenge in low-middle-income countries (LMICs). We describe our pediatric oncology nutrition program and its impact over the past decade. METHODS: We evaluated the impact of our nutrition program in accordance with the International Society of Paediatric Oncology-Paediatric Oncology in Developing Countries (SIOP PODC) Nutritional Program Evaluation in the areas of service delivery (number served, increments in delivery, number of trained care providers), patients at-risk (proportion identified with malnutrition at diagnosis/follow-up), and efficiency of nutritional interventions (proportion assessed, proportion achieved healthy weight, clinicians trained). We analyzed available data for trends between 2009 and 2020, and comparisons were made using the Fisher t test. This study was approved by our institutional ethics committee. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2020, 17 749 children treated at our center were beneficiaries of the nutritional program, including assessment and intervention. During this period, trained pediatric nutritionists increased from 2 to 8; SIOP PODC level from 2 to 3-4, and nutrition budget increased 15-fold. At diagnosis (n = 5618) and six-month follow-up (n = 2674), 59.6% and 51.2% children were undernourished, 34.8% and 43% well nourished, and 4.7% and 5.7% overnourished. From 2016 onward, fewer children were undernourished at follow-up-69.5% (2016), 60% (2018), 54% (2019), and 55% (2020, P < 0.001). The program helped train over 500 clinicians in nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: Improved financial support and capacity building have helped build and sustain an effective nutrition program. Priority areas include implementation of best practices, early nutritional intervention, continued education, and locally relevant research.

COVID-19 in Children with Cancer and Continuation of Cancer-Directed Therapy During the Infection.

OBJECTIVE: To report the experience with COVID-19 in children with cancer at the largest tertiary-cancer care and referral center in India. METHODS: This study is a single tertiary center experience on COVID-19 in children with cancer and continuation of cancer-directed therapy in them. Children ≤ 15 y on active cancer treatment detected with COVID-19 until September 15th, 2020 were prospectively followed up in the study. Patients were managed in accordance with well-laid guidelines. Treatment was continued for children with COVID-19 who were clinically stable and on intensive treatment for various childhood cancers. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two children (median age 8 y; range 1-15 y, male:female 1.7:1) with cancer were diagnosed with COVID-19. Of 118 children, 99 (83.9%), 60 (50.8%), 43 (36.4%), 26 (22.0%), and 6 (5.1%) had RT-PCR positivity at 14, 21, 28, 35, and 60 d from diagnosis of COVID-19, respectively. Scheduled risk-directed intravenous chemotherapy was delivered in 70 (90.9%) of 77 children on active systemic treatment with a median delay of 14 d (range 0-48 d) and no increased toxicities. All-cause mortality rate was 7.4% (n = 9) and COVID-19 related mortality rate was 4.9% (n = 6). One hundred-fifteen (94.2%) children with COVID-19 did not require any form of respiratory support during the course of infection. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 was not a major deterrent for the continuation of active cancer treatment despite persistent RT-PCR positivity. The long-term assessment of treatment adaptations requires further prospective follow-up and real-time addressal.

Psychological distress in primary caregivers of children with cancer during COVID-19 pandemic-A single tertiary care center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Families of children with cancer undergoing treatment during COVID-19 pandemic represent a vulnerable population for psychological distress and early identification and remedial measures are imperative for wellbeing of both the children and the caregivers. This article reports the results of assessment of psychological distress in primary caregivers of children with cancer undergoing treatment at a tertiary care center. METHODS: Primary caregivers of children with cancer (≤15 years) taking treatment at our institute during the period of July 2020 to August 2020 were prospectively evaluated for psychological distress using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) tools over a telephonic call. There were 2 cohorts, A and B (50 participants each) depending on whether child was diagnosed with COVID-19 or not respectively during the study period. RESULTS: The assessment tool, PHQ-9 showed a score of ≥10 in 13% (n = 13) participants (95%CI:7.1%-21.2%) in the entire cohort and in 16% (n = 8, 95%CI:5.8%-26.2%) and 10% (n = 5, 95%CI:1.7%-18.3%) participants in cohort A and cohort B respectively. GAD-7 showed a score of ≥8 in 18% (n = 18) participants (95%CI:11.0%-27.0%) in the entire cohort and in 20% (n = 10, 95%CI:8.9%-31.1%) and 16% (n = 8, 95%CI:5.8%-26.2%) participants in cohort A and cohort B respectively. All participants were assessed, and supportive psychotherapeutic interventions administered over telephonic call. CONCLUSIONS: Primary caregivers should be assessed and followed up for psychological distress irrespective of other co-existing factors. Robust support systems built over time could help withstand the exceptional strain of a major surge during a pandemic.

Holistic support coupled with prospective tracking reduces abandonment in childhood cancers: A report from India.

BACKGROUND: High cure rates of over 80% in childhood cancers reported from high-income countries (HICs) are not replicated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Treatment abandonment (TxA) is an important reason for this poorer outcome. We assessed the effect of a holistic support group approach coupled with prospective tracking on TxA in children with cancer in a limited-resources environment. METHODS: In 2010, all existing nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) working with childhood cancer at our hospital were brought together to form a pediatric cancer foundation with the aim of providing holistic support to the patient and family, including financial, psychosocial, lodging, educational, and bereavement support. Simultaneously, prospective tracking of all children with a Time-Responsive Electronic Abandonment Tracking (TREAT) system was also established. The impact of these measures on TxA over the 2009-2016 period was compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The annual rate of abandonment reduced from 20% in 2009 to 10.4% in 2010 and 5.2% in 2011. It has been consistently between 3% and 6% from 2012 to 2016 (P -0.04). TxA after the initiation of treatment dropped from 9% in 2009 to 1% in 2016 (P -0.02), while refusal to initiate treatment dropped from 11% to 2.7% (P -0.23) over the same period. CONCLUSIONS: A holistic support group consisting of the hospital team, as well as existing NGOs and governmental organizations, along with a systematic and prospective tracking system significantly reduced abandonment in a resource-constrained setting. This cost-effective holistic support group may be applicable in other LMICs with similar healthcare systems.

Traditional and Complementary Medicine in Pediatric Oncology and Low-Middle Income Countries: Recommendations from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP), T&CM Collaborative.

Significant strides have been made in the treatment of childhood cancer. Improvements in survival have led to increased attention toward supportive care indications; including the use of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM). The use of T&CM among children and adolescents with cancer is well documented in both high-income countries (HICs) and low-middle income countries (LMICs). A higher incidence of the use of T&CM has been reported among children undergoing treatment in LMICs, which has elevated concerns related to drug interactions, adherence to therapy, and treatment-related toxicities. These observations have underscored the need for effective models of integrative care that are culturally sensitive yet sustainable in an LMIC setting. We present considerations inclusive of the clinical care, educational opportunities, governmental policy, and research priorities necessary for the development of models of integrative care for pediatric cancer units in an LMIC setting.

Clinicoepidemiological profiles, clinical practices, and the impact of holistic care interventions on outcomes of pediatric hematolymphoid malignancies - A 7-year audit of the pediatric hematolymphoid disease management group at Tata Memorial Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: The Pediatric Hematolymphoid Disease Management Group (PHL-DMG) at a tertiary cancer care hospital developed extensive patient support programs to improve retention and outcomes while focusing on protocols adapted to meet patient needs. An audit of measures and outcomes was done for a 7-year period from January 2010 to December 2016. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DMG protocols and patient support activities over the study period were documented and audited. Data was retrieved from internal databases and records. Measures taken and their impact were assessed by descriptive analytical tools. Survival outcomes were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method on SPSS v. 24™ software. RESULTS: Holistic patient support measures were undertaken through a charitable foundation entirely under pediatric oncology. Activities included infrastructure growth, socioeconomic support, provision of accommodation, nutrition, education, and multiple blood component donation drives. Patient registrations increased from 502 in 2009 to 874 in 2016, with the steepest rise in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) - 330 (2009) to 547 (2016). Treatment refusal and abandonment rates decreased from 32% to 3.4% over the same period, and male to female ratio decreased from 2.56 to 2.28:1. Early mortality in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) fell within 2 years from 26.7% in 2009 to 7%. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 69.5% for all patients registered in 2010, whereas disease-specific 5-year OS was ALL 67.1%, AML 49.3%, chronic myeloid leukemia 100%, Hodgkin lymphoma 90.4%, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma 74.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Holistic patient support-specific activities and adapted protocols made a measurable impact on patient outcomes. High survival outcomes of patients have been achieved despite relatively few receiving salvage therapies or stem cell transplant.