Forces in cell locomotion.

The molecular mechanisms that drive animal cell locomotion are partially characterized, but not definitively understood. It seems likely that actin polymerization contributes to the forward protrusion of the leading edge of a migrating cell. Both myosin-dependent contractile forces and selective detachment of adhesive interactions with the substratum seem to contribute to release of the posterior of an extended cell. It is probable, but not certain, that a separate 'traction' force advances the cell body towards the forward anchorage sites formed by the advancing lamellipodium. The molecular mechanism of this force is unknown. Determining the role of traction forces in migrating fibroblasts and keratocytes is complicated by the fact that the primary functions of the relatively strong forces exerted on the substratum by these cells may be to establish tissue 'tone' and to remodel tissue matrices, rather than to drive locomotion. In accordance with this notion, rapidly moving cells such as neutrophils and Dictyostelium amoebae exert weaker forces on the substratum as they migrate. The traction force in cell migration may be distinct from traction forces with tissue functions. Ultimately, the mechanism may be revealed by using molecular genetics to disrupt the motors that provide this force. Reconstituted tissues provide systems in which to investigate the regulation of cell forces and their contribution to tissue mechanical properties and development.

Capping protein levels influence actin assembly and cell motility in dictyostelium.

Actin assembly is important for cell motility, but the mechanism of assembly and how it relates to motility in vivo is largely unknown. In vitro, actin assembly can be controlled by proteins, such as capping protein, that bind filament ends. To investigate the function of actin assembly in vivo, we altered the levels of capping protein in Dictyostelium cells and found changes in resting and chemoattractant-induced actin assembly that were consistent with the in vitro properties of capping protein in capping but not nucleation. Significantly, overexpressers moved faster and underexpressers moved slower than control cells. Mutants also exhibited changes in cytoskeleton architecture. These results provide insights into in vivo actin assembly and the role of the actin cytoskeleton in motility.

A mechanical function of myosin II in cell motility.

Myosin II mutant Dictyostelium amoebae crawl more slowly than wild-type cells. Thus, myosin II must contribute to amoeboid locomotion. We propose that contractile forces generated by myosin II help the cell's rear edge to detach from the substratum and retract, allowing the cell to continue forward. To test this hypothesis, we measured the speed of wild-type and myosin II null mutant Dictyostelium cells on surfaces of varying adhesivity. As substratum adhesivity increased, the speed of myosin II null mutant cells decreased substantially compared to wild-type cells, suggesting that the mutant is less able to retract from sticky surfaces. Furthermore, interference reflection microscopy revealed a myosin-II-dependent contraction in wild-type but not null mutant cells that is consistent with a balance of adhesive and contractile forces in retraction. Although myosin II null mutant cells have a defect in retraction, pseudopod extension does not cause the cells to become elongated on sticky surfaces. This suggests a mechanism, based possibly on cytoskeletal tension, for regulating cell shape in locomotion. The tension would result from the transmission of tractional forces through the cytoskeletal network, providing the myosin II null mutant with a limited means of retraction and cell division on a surface.

Studies of mechanical aspects of amoeboid locomotion.

When a cell crawls over a surface, it exerts forces which both change its shape and deformability and propel it forward. The mechanisms involved are poorly understood. They can best be studied by combining biochemical and molecular genetic methods with direct, quantitative measurements of mechanical properties. Measurements of cellular deformability provide indications of contractile tension developed within the cell and of cytoskeletal reorganizations which influence local cellular viscoelasticity. An example is the capping of cross-linked cell surface proteins, which occurs on cells as diverse as mammalian lymphocytes and the unicellular amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum. Deformability measurements show that cells stiffen as they cap. Measurements on wild-type Dictyostelium cells and on cells engineered to lack conventional myosin (myosin II) demonstrate that capping requires myosin II and that the concurrent cellular stiffening results from a myosin-II-dependent contractile force. Measurements of the systematic transport of beads rearward over the surfaces of cells characterize a mechanism of movement which could be used to drive the cell forward. Capping is one such mechanism. A distinct myosin-II-independent form of rearward transport is revealed in measurements of fluorescent beads on the Dictyostelium cells which lack this protein. In addition to studies of cell locomotion, measurements of cellular mechanical properties can provide quantitative assays of the functions of cytoskeletal components. Such studies are motivated by the nature of cytoskeletal proteins whose function, in contrast to enzymes, are mechanical rather that catalytic.

Surface particle transport mechanism independent of myosin II in Dictyostelium.

Cellular locomotion could be driven by the rearward transport of membrane-bound particles observed on motile fibroblasts, keratinocytes and neuronal growth cones. A force propelling free surface particles backwards could move the cell forwards if the particles were anchored to a rigid substratum. During capping, myosin II ('double-headed' myosin) draws crosslinked membrane proteins to the rear of a cell. The mhcA- mutant of the amoebal stage of the slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum, in which the myosin II gene has been deleted, cannot cap surface particles but can crawl along the substratum. Thus, the mechanism driving capping is not essential for locomotion. We show here that the null mutant is capable of a different type of active rearward transport, independent of myosin II and distinct from capping. The transported particles on mhcA- cells follow parallel paths. In the wild-type Ax2 strain, myosin II causes particles to converge towards a focal point and significantly increases the velocity of transport behind the leading edge of the cell.