RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia is a medical emergency and it requires immediate hospitalization for evaluation and administration of empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics. The present study was undertaken to analyze the infectious agents, choice of empiric antibiotics, and outcome in high-risk febrile neutropenia in the solid organ malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 92 high risk febrile neutropenic episodes were analyzed in 72 patients with solid organ malignancies. We used cefoperazone-sulbactum as an initial empiric antibiotic. Piperacillin/tazobactum or carbapenems were added to the patients who did not respond to initial antibiotic. RESULTS: Among the 92 episodes treated, most patients received first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced disease. Microbes were isolated in 25% of febrile neutropenic episodes. Gram-negative organism (61.70%) constituted the most common isolates. The most common microbes identified were E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus in blood, Klebsiella pneumonia in sputum and E. coli in urine culture. Patients who had been treated with cefoperazone-sulbactum improved clinically in 70.6% of febrile neutropenic episodes. Second- line antibiotics (piperacillin-tazobactum with amikacin) were required in 24% episodes, while another 5.4% episodes required third-line antibiotics (carbapenems). In this study, mortality was seen in 12% of febrile neutropenic episodes. Staphylococcus aureus was 100% sensitive to linezolid, teicoplanin, and vancomycin, whereas Gram-negative organisms were 100% sensitive to imepenem and meropenem. CONCLUSION: Cephaperazone-sulbactum is a reasonable initial choice for empirical therapy in high risk febrile neutropenic patients in solid organ malignancies.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neutropenia Febril/etiologia , Neoplasias/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Gerenciamento Clínico , Neutropenia Febril/diagnóstico , Neutropenia Febril/microbiologia , Neutropenia Febril/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common but serious complication of chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors (ST) and hematological malignancies (HM). The epidemiology of FN keeps changing. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to study the epidemiology of FN in adult patients with ST and HM at Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore - A tertiary cancer care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of all episodes of FN that occurred during the period July 2011 to December 2011 were collected prospectively and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 75 episodes of FN was observed during study period involving 55 patients. Febrile neutropenic episodes were more frequent in HM than in ST (57% vs. 43%). The rate of bloodstream infection was 14.7%. Gram-negative organisms were the predominant isolates (56.25%). Overall mortality rate was 13.3%. Presence of medical co-morbidity and positive culture predicted high mortality. Mortality rate did not differ significantly between HM and ST (14% vs. 12.5%; P = 1.0). Gram-positive bacteremia was associated with greater mortality than Gram-negative bacteremia (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Empiric antibiotic treatment for FN should be tailored to the locally prevalent pathogens and their susceptibility patterns.