Clinical and biochemical profile of childhood-adolescent-onset type 1 diabetes and adult-onset type 1 diabetes among Asian Indians.

AIM: To compare the clinical and biochemical profile and prevalence of complications among childhood/adolescent-onset (CAO; onset of diabetes< 20 years of age) and adult-onset (AO; onset of diabetes- ≥ 20 years of age) type 1 diabetes (T1D), seen at a tertiary care diabetes center in south India. METHOD: Data of 5578 individuals with T1D, diagnosed based on a history of diabetic ketoacidosis or ketonuria, fasting C-peptide < 0.3 pmol/mL and stimulated C-peptide values < 0.6 pmol/mL, and requirement of insulin right from the time of diagnosis, presenting to our center between 1991 and 2021, were retrieved from our electronic medical records. Retinopathy was assessed by retinal photography, chronic kidney disease (CKD) by urinary albumin excretion ≥ 30 µg/mg of creatinine and/or eGFR < 60 mL/min, and neuropathy by vibration perception threshold >= 20v on biothesiometry. RESULTS: Overall, 3559 (63.8%) of individuals with T1D, belonged to CAO group and 2019 (36.2%) to AO category. AO had higher prevalence of all microvascular complications compared to CAO at every diabetes duration interval, even after adjusting for A1c. Among the AO group, prevalence of retinopathy, CKD, and neuropathy was higher in the GAD negative group. Among CAO there were no differences between the GAD negative and GAD positive groups with respect to prevalence of complications of diabetes. CONCLUSION: AO with T1D had higher prevalence of microvascular complications compared to CAO. Among AO, GAD negative individuals had higher percentage of retinopathy and CKD compared to GAD positive group.

Glycemic parameters in patients with new-onset diabetes during COVID-19 pandemic are more severe than in patients with new-onset diabetes before the pandemic: NOD COVID India Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is not known if new onset diabetes during Coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19; NOD COVID) is phenotypically or biochemically different than new onset diabetes before COVID-19 (NOD). METHODS: All adults diagnosed with new onset diabetes from during the time of COVID-19 were compared with new onset diabetes prior to COVID-19 from two tertiary care hospitals in Chennai and Delhi. RTPCR test for SARS-CoV-2 virus was done as appropriate, and COVID-19 antibody test was done in all other NOD COVID patients. RESULT: A total of 555 patients with new onset diabetes were included in the study (282 NOD and 273 NOD COVID patients). Patients with NOD COVID had higher fasting and post prandial blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels vs. NOD patients. Both the groups had high average body mass index; ∼28 kg/m2. Interestingly, fasting C-peptide levels were significantly higher in the NOD COVID group vs. NOD group. There was no difference in C-peptide levels or glycemic parameters between the COVID-19 antibody positive and negative NOD COVID cases. CONCLUSION: Individuals who were diagnosed with diabetes during COVID-19 epidemic (NOD COVID) do not significantly differ from those diagnosed before COVID-19 in symptomatology, phenotype, and C-peptide levels but they had more severe glycemia.

Correlation between markers of renal function and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study in an Indian clinic population.

INTRODUCTION: Previous epidemiological studies have reported on the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) from India. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of DKD on the development of new-onset DR and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) in Asian Indians with type 2 diabetes (T2D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was done on anonymized electronic medical record data of people with T2D who had undergone screening for DR and renal work-up as part of routine follow-up at a tertiary care diabetes center in Chennai, South India. The baseline data retrieved included clinical and biochemical parameters including renal profiles (serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria). Grading of DR was performed using the modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grading system. STDR was defined as the presence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and/or diabetic macular edema. DKD was defined by the presence of albuminuria (≥30 µg/mg) and/or reduction in eGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the hazard ratio (HR) for DR and STDR. RESULTS: Data of 19 909 individuals with T2D (mean age 59.6±10.2 years, mean duration of diabetes 11.1±12.1 years, 66.1% male) were analyzed. At baseline, DR was present in 7818 individuals (39.3%), of whom 2249 (11.3%) had STDR. During the mean follow-up period of 3.9±1.9 years, 2140 (17.7%) developed new-onset DR and 980 individuals with non-proliferative DR (NPDR) at baseline progressed to STDR. Higher serum creatinine (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.7; p<0.0001), eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 4.9, 95% CI 2.9 to 8.2; p<0.0001) and presence of macroalbuminuria >300 µg/mg (HR 3.0, 95% CI 2.4 to 3.8; p<0.0001) at baseline were associated with increased risk of progression to STDR. CONCLUSIONS: DKD at baseline is a risk factor for progression to STDR. Physicians should promptly refer their patients with DKD to ophthalmologists for timely detection and management of STDR.