Cerebral Perfusion Pressure is Maintained in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A CT Perfusion Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although blood pressure reduction has been postulated to result in a fall in cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, the latter is rarely measured. We assessed regional cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage by using CT perfusion source data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with acute primary intracerebral hemorrhage were randomized to target systolic blood pressures of <150 mm Hg (n = 37) or <180 mm Hg (n = 36). Regional maps of cerebral blood flow, cerebral perfusion pressure, and cerebrovascular resistance were generated by using CT perfusion source data, obtained 2 hours after randomization. RESULTS: Perihematoma cerebral blood flow (38.7 ± 11.9 mL/100 g/min) was reduced relative to contralateral regions (44.1 ± 11.1 mL/100 g/min, P = .001), but cerebral perfusion pressure was not (14.4 ± 4.6 minutes(-1) versus 14.3 ± 4.8 minutes(-1), P = .93). Perihematoma cerebrovascular resistance (0.34 ± 0.11 g/mL) was higher than that in the contralateral region (0.30 ± 0.10 g/mL, P < .001). Ipsilateral and contralateral cerebral perfusion pressure in the external (15.0 ± 4.6 versus 15.6 ± 5.3 minutes(-1), P = .15) and internal (15.0 ± 4.8 versus 15.0 ± 4.8 minutes(-1), P = .90) borderzone regions were all similar. Borderzone cerebral perfusion pressure was similar to mean global cerebral perfusion pressure (14.7 ± 4.7 minutes(-1), P ≥ .29). Perihematoma cerebral perfusion pressure did not differ between blood pressure treatment groups (13.9 ± 5.5 minutes(-1) versus 14.8 ± 3.4 minutes(-1), P = .38) or vary with mean arterial pressure (r = -0.08, [-0.10, 0.05]). CONCLUSIONS: Perihematoma cerebral perfusion pressure is maintained despite increased cerebrovascular resistance and reduced cerebral blood flow. Aggressive antihypertensive therapy does not affect perihematoma or borderzone cerebral perfusion pressure. Maintenance of cerebral perfusion pressure provides physiologic support for the safety of blood pressure reduction in intracerebral hemorrhage.

The ASPIRE approach for TIA risk stratification.

BACKGROUND: The risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack (TIA) is elevated in the days to weeks after TIA. A variety of prediction rules to predict stroke risk have been suggested. In Alberta a triage algorithm to facilitate urgent access based on risk level was agreed upon for the province. Patients with ABCD2 score ≥ 4, or motor or speech symptoms lasting greater than five minutes, or with atrial fibrillation were considered high risk (the ASPIRE approach). We assessed the ability of the ASPIRE approach to identify patients at risk for stroke. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts from 573 consecutive patients diagnosed with TIA in Foothills Hospital emergency room from 2002 through 2005. We recorded clinical and event details and identified the risk of stroke at three months. RESULTS: Among 573 patients the 90-day risk of stroke was 4.7% (95% CI 3.0%, 6.4%). 78% of the patients were identified as high risk using this approach. In patients defined as high risk on the ASPIRE approach there was a 6.3% (95% CI 4.2%, 8.9%) risk of stroke. In patients defined as low risk using the ASPIRE approach there were no recurrent strokes (100% negative predictive value). In contrast, two patients with low ABCD2 scores (ABCD2 score < 4) suffered recurrent strokes. CONCLUSION: The ASPIRE approach has a perfect negative predictive value in the population in predicting stroke. However, this high sensitivity comes at a cost of identifying most patients as high risk.

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes (RCVS) are a group of disorders that have in common an acute presentation with headache, reversible vasoconstriction of cerebral arteries, with or without neurological signs and symptoms. In contrast to primary central nervous system vasculitis, they have a relatively benign course. We describe here a patient who was diagnosed with RCVS.

The high risk of stroke immediately after transient ischemic attack: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: The risk of stroke is elevated in the first 48 hours after TIA. Previous prognostic models suggest that diabetes mellitus, age, and clinical symptomatology predict stroke. The authors evaluated the magnitude of risk of stroke and predictors of stroke after TIA in an entire population over time. METHODS: Administrative data from four different databases were used to define TIA and stroke for the entire province of Alberta for the fiscal year (April 1999-March 2000). The age-adjusted incidence of TIA was estimated using direct standardization to the 1996 Canadian population. The risk of stroke after a diagnosis of TIA in an Alberta emergency room was defined using a Kaplan-Meier survival function. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to develop adjusted risk estimates. Risk assessment began 24 hours after presentation and therefore the risk of stroke in the first few hours after TIA is not captured by our approach. RESULTS: TIA was reported among 2,285 patients for an emergency room diagnosed, age-adjusted incidence of 68.2 per 100,000 population (95% CI 65.3 to 70.9). The risk of stroke after TIA was 9.5% (95% CI 8.3 to 10.7) at 90 days and 14.5% (95% CI 12.8 to 16.2) at 1 year. The risk of combined stroke, myocardial infarction, or death was 21.8% (95% CI 20.0 to 23.6) at 1 year. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and older age predicted stroke at 1 year but not earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Although stroke is common after TIA, the early risk is not predicted by clinical and demographic factors. Validated models to identify which patients require urgent intervention are needed.

Prevention of strokes.

Stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for stroke have been determined through prospective epidemiologic study. Control of risk factors has been demonstrated to reduce stroke incidence, either through controlled trials or inferred from observational studies. In the past few years, new approaches to the treatment of established risk factors have been discovered. These include aggressive control of hypertension in diabetes patients, prevention of type 2 diabetes through lifestyle modification, carotid endarterectomy for moderate symptomatic carotid stenosis, encouragement of a high level of physical activity, and control of abdominal obesity and elevated body mass index. In addition, new strategies for stroke prevention have been identified, including encouragement of a diet high in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and omega-3 fatty acids, the use of vitamins B12, B6, and folic acid in hyperhomocysteinemia, and moderate alcohol consumption. Clinical trial data support the use of hydroxy-methyl-coenzyme A inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease, and ramipril in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes, for the primary prevention of stroke. New risk factors for stroke are being investigated, including the role of chronic inflammation and infection, and these may provide future strategies for stroke prevention.

Dose-dependent neuroprotection with tiagabine in a focal cerebral ischemia model in rat.

Enhancement of the inhibitory activity of GABA may protect ischemic neurons. We evaluated the neuroprotective effect of tiagabine, a novel GABA agonist, in reversible focal cerebral ischemia rats subjected to 2h middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. Tiagabine was given at 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg, i.p., 2 h after the onset of reperfusion. We found that post-ischemia treatment with tiagabine improved neurobehavioral outcome and reduced brain infarction volume in a dose-dependent manner. The data suggest that post-ischemic administration of tiagabine is neuroprotective in the focal cerebral ischemia model.

A representational vertical bias.

We attempted to determine whether separable components underlie normal subjects' upward bias in bisecting vertical and radial lines under visual guidance. Twelve normal subjects indicated the midpoint of visually presented lines oriented vertically, radially, and horizontally. We placed directional labels ("TOP" and "BOTTOM") at either end of each line. Subjects showed significant bias toward the label TOP in horizontal, vertical, and "radial-down" (below eye level) conditions but not in the "radial-up" (above eye level) position. In the horizontal condition, the misbisections actually changed direction depending on whether TOP was to the left or right of midpoint. There were two biases: one toward an internally represented "top" (as suggested by the verbal labels) and another toward the upper visual field. The latter was stronger when the two were opposed. These findings suggest that normal subjects' upward bias on bisection of vertical and radial lines under visual guidance has both representational- and visual field-based components.