Impact of radiation-induced xerostomia on quality of life after primary radiotherapy among patients with head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of xerostomia on overall quality of life (QoL) outcome and related dimensions among head and neck cancer patients treated with primary radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 288 patients with Stage I-IV disease without distant metastases were included. Late xerostomia according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG-xerostomia) and QoL (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLC-C30) were assessed at baseline and every 6th month from 6 months to 24 months after radiotherapy. RESULTS: A significant association was found between RTOG-xerostomia and overall QoL outcome (effect size [ES] 0.07, p < 0.001). A significant relationship with global QoL, all functioning scales, and fatigue and insomnia was observed. A significant interaction term was present between RTOG-xerostomia and gender and between RTOG-xerostomia and age. In terms of gender, RTOG-xerostomia had a larger impact on overall QoL outcome in women (ES 0.13 for women vs. 0.07 for men). Furthermore, in women ES on individual scales were larger, and a marked worsening was observed with increasing RTOG-xerostomia. No different ES according to age was seen (ES 0.10 for 18-65 years vs. 0.08 for >65 years). An analysis of the impact of RTOG-xerostomia on overall QoL outcome over time showed an increase from 0.09 at 6 months to 0.22 at 24 months. With elapsing time, a worsening was found for these individual scales with increasing RTOG-xerostomia. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this prospective study are the first to show a significant impact of radiation-induced xerostomia on QoL. Although the incidence of Grade > or =2 RTOG-xerostomia decreases with time, its impact on QoL increases. This finding emphasizes the importance of prevention of xerostomia.

Unilateral versus bilateral irradiation in squamous cell head and neck cancer in relation to patient-rated xerostomia and sticky saliva.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate the association between radiation technique with patient-rated moderate and severe xerostomia and sticky saliva. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients treated with bilateral or unilateral irradiation for head and neck cancer were included. The salivary glands and the oral cavity were delineated on plannings-CT scans. Xerostomia and sticky saliva were assessed using the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaire at baseline and 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: At 6 months a significant association between radiation technique and the mean parotid dose (MD(parb)) and xerostomia was observed (Odds ratio (OR)-technique: 2.55; p=0.04 and OR-MD(parb): 1.04; p=0.009). Considering the individual salivary glands, only the mean dose in the contralateral parotid gland (MD(parcl)) is associated with xerostomia (OR: 1.04; p<0.0001). Moreover, the threshold dose for a 50% probability (P50) on xerostomia increased from 21 Gy with bilateral to 44 Gy for unilateral irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Both technique and MD(parb) influence the risk of xerostomia in irradiated patients. Of all individual salivary glands, only MD(parcl) is of utmost importance for xerostomia. The shift in the P50 observed for xerostomia suggests that sparing of the contralateral parotid gland is compensated by hyperfunction of the contralateral parotid gland.

Radiotherapy alone, versus radiotherapy with amifostine 3 times weekly, versus radiotherapy with amifostine 5 times weekly: A prospective randomized study in squamous cell head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study was to investigate whether nondaily intravenous administration of amifostine was as effective as daily intravenous administration with regard to the reduction of the incidence of Grade 2 or greater xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Ninety-one patients who received bilateral irradiation for head and neck cancer were included. Thirty patients received no amifostine (AMI-0), 31 patients received amifostine at a dose of 200 mg/m2 3 times weekly (AMI-3), and 30 patients received amifostine at a dose of 200 mg/m2 daily (5 times weekly) (AMI-5). Acute and late xerostomia and quality of life (QOL) were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks later, and at 6-month intervals from 6 months to 24 months postradiotherapy. RESULTS: Grade 2 or greater late xerostomia differed significantly at 6 months (AMI-0 74% vs. AMI-3 67% vs. AMI-5 52%; P = .03), but not thereafter. During follow-up, patient-rated xerostomia deteriorated more in AMI-0 patients (mean difference score:, 52 for AMI-0 compared with 25 for AMI-3, and 29 for AMI-5; P = .01). Nausea and emesis were reported most frequently as side effect, but Grade 2 or greater toxicity was observed in only 4 patients. However, 28% of patients discontinued amifostine before the end of radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, patient-rated xerostomia was less for the AMI-3 and AMI-5 groups through 2-year follow-up, but no difference was noted between the AMI-3 and AMI-5 groups. For late xerostomia according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria, the same effect was observed at 6 months, but not thereafter.

Does radiation dose to the salivary glands and oral cavity predict patient-rated xerostomia and sticky saliva in head and neck cancer patients treated with curative radiotherapy?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate the association between the mean salivary gland and oral cavity dose, with patient-rated moderate and severe xerostomia and sticky saliva. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients treated with bilateral irradiation for head and neck cancer were included. The parotid and submandibular glands and the oral cavity were delineated on plannings-CT scans. At baseline and 6 and 12 months self-reported xerostomia and sticky saliva were assessed using the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaire. RESULTS: At 6 months a significant association between the mean parotid (MD(par)) and mean submandibular dose (MD(subm)) and xerostomia was observed (OR - MD(par): 1.17; P=0.002 and OR - MD(subm): 1.08; P = 0.02). Between MD(par) and MD(subm), a significant interaction term was present. No significant association was found with the oral cavity dose. Xerostomia was reversible depending on MD(par) and MD(subm). Considering Sticky saliva, a significant association was found at 6 and 12 months with MD(subm) (OR: 1.03; P < 0.001). The P50 for sticky saliva increased with elapsing time. CONCLUSIONS: Both MD(par) and MD(subm) influence the risk of xerostomia in irradiated patients at 6 months. This probability as a function of the mean parotid dose significantly depended on the mean dose in the submandibular glands. Sticky saliva mainly depends on MD(subm).