Systemic treatment for neuroendocrine non-small cell lung carcinoma: A cases series and a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Neuroendocrine lung cancer constitutes a continuum from carcinoid tumours (CT) to large cell neuroendocrine (LCNEC) and small-cell carcinomas (SCLC). Except for SCLC, there is no consensual agreement on systemic therapy. The aim of this study is to review our clinical experience among patients with CT and LCNEC in the light of a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients with CT and LCNEC receiving a systemic therapy at Institut Jules Bordet and Erasme Hospital between 01/01/2000-31/12/2020. A systematic review of the literature was performed in Ovid Medline. RESULTS: 53 patients (21 CT and 32 LCNEC) were included. Despite limited response rates, patients with CT receiving a "carcinoid-like" 1st-line regimen (somatostatin analogues (SSA), everolimus, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)) had a numerically longer survival compared to those receiving other type of regimens (median 51.4 vs 18.6 months, respectively; p = 0.17). We observed a similar survival between 1st line "SCLC-like" vs "non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-like" schemes in LCNEC (median 11.2 vs 12.6 months, respectively; p = 0.46). The systematic review identified 23 studies (12 prospective, 15 and 8 for CT and LCNEC respectively). For CT, everolimus and SSA led to prolonged disease control with an acceptable toxicity profile, while higher response rates but lower tolerance were associated with PRRT and chemotherapy regimens including oxaliplatine and dacarbazine. For LCNEC, no difference emerged when comparing "SCLC-like" and "NSCLC-like" regimens considering response rate, progression-free or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: SSA, everolimus and PRRT present a good therapeutic index for CT, while the role of chemotherapy remains limited to aggressive and rapidly evolving CT. The best type of chemotherapy regimen remains an open question in LCNEC.

Complete Response to Afatinib of an EGFR Exon 18 delE709_T710insD-Mutated Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are frequently found in patients with lung adenocarcinomas, 90% being deletions in exon 19 or point mutation in exon 21. Three generations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR mutations are available and have changed patient prognosis but less data is available on exon 18 mutations and their sensitivity to TKI therapy. Exon 18 delE709_T710insD accounts for 0.06% (16/27,294) of all EGFR mutations and is an oncogenic driver. Several partial responses to afatinib have been described. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report the first case, to the best of our knowledge, of the complete response to afatinib of a 57-year-old patient with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with a delE709_T710insD mutation in the EGFR gene detected by next-generation sequencing. Oral afatinib was prescribed and despite treatment interruptions and dosage tapering due to cutaneous adverse events, a complete response was achieved 12 months after treatment initiation and is currently maintained at 17 months. CONCLUSION: When EGFR mutation is suspected, complete DNA sequencing of exons 18 to 21 should be carried out and we suggest that afatinib should be the first-line treatment for exon 18 delE709_T710insD-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinomas. LEARNING POINTS: Rare EGFR gene mutations are not detected by standard diagnostic kits.DNA sequencing is required to diagnose rare mutations of the EGFR gene.delE709_T710insD-mutated stage IV lung adenocarcinomas respond to afatinib.