RESUMO
Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous disorder with a spectrum of presentation. Studies have reported considerably different rates in terms of the incidence of polycystic ovary morphology (PCOM) in patients with PCOS with inconsistent results regarding the effects of PCOM in them. Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the differences in clinical presentation, metabolic profile, hormonal parameters and inflammatory markers in PCOS women with and without PCOM on ultrasonography (USG). Settings and Design: A total of 70 PCOS women were recruited. To analyse the differences between various parameters, the patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of PCOM on USG of the pelvis as per the Rotterdam criteria. Materials and Methods: A total of 37 patients had PCOM as per the diagnostic criteria for PCOS (Group 1), while 33 patients did not have PCOM on USG and were designated as Group 2. All participants underwent a detailed clinical evaluation and biochemical investigations, including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, serum adiponectin, luteinising hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, total testosterone and serum anti-Mullerian hormone. The homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) was calculated using standard equations. Statistical Analysis Used: The mean and Standard deviation were computed for all continuous variables. Frequencies and proportions were calculated for categorical variables. Comparisons of the mean scores between the study groups were assessed using the Unpaired Student's t-test. The mean score of the subgroups was also compared using the unpaired Student's t-test. P < 0.05 was considered significant for all statistical inferences. Results: The mean LDL and mean triglyceride were higher in Group 2, which was statistically significant (P = 0.004 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively). The mean hs-CRP was found to be higher in Group 2, which was statistically significant (P = 0.005). The mean AMH was higher in Group 1, which was statistically significant (P = 0.002). Group 1 had higher adiponectin levels, which was statistically significant (P = 0.04). Conclusion: The above findings suggest that patients without diagnostic PCO morphology have a worse metabolic profile compared to those with PCO morphology on USG. Obese patients without PCO morphology probably have a higher cardiovascular risk compared to obese patients with PCO morphology.
RESUMO
AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aimed to compare the different adiposity parameters, namely visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) between patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and controls. In addition, it aimed to correlate these adiposity indices with hormonal parameters as well as cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in patients with PCOS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Newly diagnosed PCOS patients of reproductive age group according to Rotterdam criteria were included. Age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched healthy females with normal menstrual cycles were taken as controls. All the study participants underwent detailed clinical, biochemical, and hormonal evaluation. Transabdominal ultrasound (US) was performed for detailed ovary imaging and assessment of adiposity (SAT and VAT) parameters. RESULTS: A total of 58 PCOS patients and 40 age- and BMI-matched controls were included. PCOS patients had significantly higher levels of androgens (P < 0.001), elevated highly sensitive C-reactive protein (P = 0.007), and higher degree of insulin resistance (P < 0.001) than controls. PCOS patients had a mean SAT of 2.37 ± 0.7 cm and mean VAT of 8.65 ± 1.78 cm. These parameters were significantly higher than controls who had a mean SAT of 2.01 ± 0.7 cm (P = 0.014) and mean VAT of 7.4 ± 1.89 cm (P = 0.003), despite both groups having similar BMI. Among PCOS cohort, VAT correlated positively with total testosterone (r = 0.295, P = 0.025) and negatively with dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (r = -0.210, P = 0.114). However, no significant correlation was observed between SAT and androgens in PCOS group. CONCLUSION: PCOS patients, whether obese or nonobese, had elevated visceral adiposity than controls. VAT correlated positively with adverse CV risk factors and testosterone in PCOS patients. Hence, a simple and inexpensive ultrasonography screening of visceral fat may identify women who have adverse metabolic profile and enhanced CV risk.
