Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 4(4): 343-350, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15682517

RESUMO

Serum samples from people exposed to sheep at a research facility were evaluated by a commercial laboratory and resulted in an overall Coxiella burnetii seroprevalence of 75%. We interviewed individuals to determine exposure history and compatible illness, and retested their sera. Analysis indicated that the commercial laboratory was misinterpreting its results; when corrected, the seroprevalence dropped to 27%. Test kits of the brand used by the commercial laboratory gave equivalent results to the in-house CDC assay when tested in parallel at CDC. Upon final analysis, only the attending veterinarian was confirmed as a Q fever case. This event resulted in increased risk reduction protocols at the research facility and improved public health communication among health authorities. This pseudoepidemic resulted from a lapse in laboratory quality control for testing. Similar errors can be avoided through standardization and improved review of laboratory procedures.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Laboratórios/normas , Febre Q/diagnóstico , Doenças dos Ovinos/diagnóstico , Animais , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Coxiella burnetii/imunologia , Surtos de Doenças , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Florida/epidemiologia , Humanos , Febre Q/epidemiologia , Febre Q/microbiologia , Controle de Qualidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Ovinos , Doenças dos Ovinos/epidemiologia , Doenças dos Ovinos/microbiologia , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...