RESUMO
To provide a systematic review on the clinical utility of anti-inflammatory polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in cancer-associated anorexia-cachexia syndrome (ACS), clinical trials involving eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) for the management of ACS were identified in the medical literature using MEDLINE (1966 to October 2006) and EMBASE (1980 to October 2006). Review Manager 4.1 was used to compare trials based on outcome measures of interest, including weight change, lean muscle mass change, survival, and quality of life (QoL). Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Various outcome measures were used in each study. Variability in study populations, dose of EPA and DHA, and standardized scales did not allow for analysis using Review Manager 4.1. Therefore, trials were summarized based on their individual outcomes. Except for one trial showing a positive effect on weight, none of the trials found a clinically or statistically significant difference in outcome measures reviewed. EPA and DHA alone have not shown significant clinical effect in altering weight, lean muscle mass, survival, or QoL in patients with ACS associated with cancer.