A single-blinded case-control study of memantine in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common debilitating psychiatric illness that typically improves but does not remit with first-line medication and behavioral treatments. Serotonergic agents including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and clomipramine have provided the mainstay of OCD medication management for decades. Combined dopamine/serotonergic agents such as atypical antipsychotics are presently the only OCD-augmenting strategies proven effective via randomized controlled trials. Despite increasing evidence for a pathogenic role of glutamate in OCD, no controlled trials of glutamatergic augmenting agents have been reported. METHODS: An intent-to-treat sample included 44 subjects receiving standard treatment at the McLean/Massachusetts General Hospital Intensive Residential Treatment (IRT) program, 22 of whom also received memantine augmentation. Admission, monthly and discharge measures of OCD, depression, and psychosocial functioning were collected by raters blinded to augmentation status. Matched controls were selected based on sex, initial OCD severity, psychosocial functioning, and timing of admission. The Clinical Global Improvement Scale captured global clinical change. RESULTS: Mean (SD) Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score decreases were 7.2 (6.4) among the cases and 4.6 (5.9) among the matched controls, reflecting mean clinical improvement among the cases (27.0% decrease) but not the controls (16.5% decrease). Mean (SD) depression severity score decreases were 5.8 (9.5) among the cases and 4.7 (9.9) among the controls. Initial intrusive obsessions were significantly more severe among marked responders compared with limited response or nonresponse cases (4.4 vs 2.9; t = 2.15; P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary supportive evidence for the effectiveness of memantine as a glutamatergic augmenting agent in severe OCD. Future randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials are warranted.

Long-term outcome following Intensive Residential Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

BACKGROUND: IRT has been demonstrated as an effective treatment for severe, refractory OCD. METHODS: Consecutive IRT subjects were ascertained over a 12 month period (female N=26, male N=35). Psychometric measures were completed at admission and discharge from the McLean/MGH OCD Institute IRT, including the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSA)(N=61). These measures were repeated at one (N=57), three (N=42) and six months (N=36) following discharge. This study was IRB approved. RESULTS: OCD mean severity did not significantly worsen from discharge to the one (17.4, SD 6.5), three (16.5, SD 7.4) or six month (16.2, SD 7.3) follow-up (p>0.25). Furthermore, the significant improvement from admission was maintained at each of the one (17.4, SD 6.5), three (16.5, SD 7.4) and six month (16.2, SD SD 7.3) follow-up time points (p<0.001). Relapsers were significantly more likely to be living alone following discharge (p=0.01), and were less likely to have comorbid illnesses (p=0.02). There were no significant differences found between study dropouts and completers with regards to YBOCS scores (P>0.47). CONCLUSION: In the first OCD IRT long-term follow-up study to date, findings have indicated that mean treatment gains were maintained at one, three, and six months post-discharge. This finding is important as it suggests that improvements of OCD severity were subsequently retained in home and work environments. Improvement of depression severity from admission was also maintained.