Hip fractures re-operation compared with death at two year in elderly patients: lowest risk of revision with dual mobility total hip arthroplasty than with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation of Garden I and II.

PURPOSE: This study determined at two year follow-up the lifetime risk of re-operation for elderly patients with hip fractures undergoing internal fixation, dual mobility total hip arthroplasty, or bipolar hemiarthroplasty, using death of the patient as a competing risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the hypothesis that arthroplasties may have less complications without increasing mortality even for Garden I and Garden II fractures, we retrospectively reviewed 317 hips with femoral neck fractures operated between January 2015 and August 2019. The mean age at time of surgical intervention was 82.4 years (range 65 to 105). Sixty patients presented a nondisplaced hip fracture (Garden I or II) treated by internal fixtion (I-F), and 257 were treated by hip arthroplasty: 118 dual mobility total hip arthroplasty (DM-THA) and 139 with a bipolar hemiarthroplaty (B-H). Demographics, surgical and complications data, and mortality were collected and compared for each group. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 22.4% at two years, and similar (p = 0.98) in all groups, respectively 22%, 22%, and 23% for DM-THA, B-H, and I-F groups. With dual mobility THA, the cumulative incidence of re-operations for any reason was (lower (9%) than with internal fixation (22%) or bipolar hemiarthroplasties (19%). CONCLUSION: Using a double mobility total prosthesis does not increase the post-operative mortality of the patients, nor does it increase their survival. But, reducing the risk of complications certainly improves their quality of life during the little time they have left .

Sufentanil sublingual tablet system versus oral oxycodone for management of postoperative pain in enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: Effectiveness of sufentanil sublingual tablet system (SSTS) compared to oral oxycodone in the management of postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. METHODS: This pragmatic, parallel, open label, randomized controlled, trial enrolled 72 adult patients scheduled for TKA under spinal anesthesia following ERAS pathway. In addition to multimodal analgesia, patients received SSTS 15 mcg (SSTS group) or oral oxycodone extended release 10 mg twice daily and oral oxycodone immediate-release 5 mg up to four times daily on demand (Oxy group) to control pain during 48 h postoperatively. The primary endpoint was pain measured using a numeric rating scale at 24 h postoperatively. Time to first mobilization, side effects and patient satisfaction were also recorded. RESULTS: Median pain score at 24 h at rest was 3 [2-4] for Oxy group vs 2 [1.75-3] for SSTS group (p = 0.272) whereas median pain score on movement was 4 [3-6] vs 3 [2-5] respectively (p = 0.059). No difference in time to first mobilization was found between the two groups. The method of pain control was judged good/excellent for 83.9% of patients in the SSTS group compared with 52.9% in the Oxy group (p = 0.007). The incidence of nausea was 33% in SSTS group and 9% in Oxy group (p = 0.181). CONCLUSIONS: In complement to ERAS multimodal analgesia, sublingual sufentanil 15 mcg tablet system did not show clinically significant pain improvement compared to oral oxycodone after total knee arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials: NCT04448457 ; retrospectively registered on June 24, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04448457?cond=sublingual+sufentanil&cntry=BE&draw=2&rank=3.

Post-COVID-19 return to elective orthopaedic surgery-is rescheduling just a reboot process? Which timing for tests? Is chest CT scan still useful? Safety of the first hundred elective cases? How to explain the "new normality health organization" to patients?

PURPOSE: The long incubation period and asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 present considerable challenges for health care institutions when patients return to elective surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of the first adult elective cases performed between May 18, 2020 and June 14, 2020, after the end of lockdown was analysed in Belgium to answer the following questions: (1) for the 236 cancelled patients during the outbreak, how easy was rescheduling? (2) How useful was universal RT-PCR testing and chest CT scan for the 211 orthopaedic and trauma admissions? (3) How were surgical difficulty category, number of operations and complications different when compared to the pre-COVID period? (4) How would patients balance the benefit of surgery against the unknown risk of developing COVID-19? RESULTS: Before surgery, blood tests for anaesthesiology and imaging related to the surgical procedure were scheduled prior to universal testing (COVID-19 PCR and chest CT) performed 72-120 hours before surgery. Among the 211 asymptomatic patients who were tested before surgery, six had positive PCR, while no abnormality was found on the chest CT scan of all the patients. With this timing for tests, the 104 patients included in the current study for elective surgery were free of disease before undergoing surgery and remained without COVID-19 after surgery. Among the 366 cancelled patients during the outbreak, only 12% of the patients accepted to proceed with rescheduling immediately. Therefore, this resulted in a 70% reduction for elective surgery and in a 50% reduction for arthroplasties as compared to pre-COVID period. The rate of complications was not increased during the post-COVID period. A portion of patients have confused idea of screening and have difficulty to perceive the new rules of health organization. CONCLUSIONS: Resumption of elective surgical procedures appears more difficult for patients than for surgeons with a low percentage of cancelled patients accepting to reschedule surgery. Universal testing allowed securing patients; however, surgeons must explore better patient perceptions regarding COVID-19 to facilitate a fully informed decision in the current period.

Terrible triad of the elbow with an ipsilateral Essex-Lopresti injury: case report.

Terrible triad of the elbow and the Essex-Lopresti injury are both rare lesions with a historically poor clinical outcome. We present the case of a unique association of the two injuries with an elbow dislocation, radial and coronoid process fractures and a distal radioulnar joint dislocation due to an interosseous membrane rupture. The case was managed with closed reduction of the elbow dislocation and distal radioulnar joint followed by open reduction and repair of the damaged structures in the elbow and an unloading of the interosseous membrane. A high index of suspicion with a detailed examination of the elbow, forearm and wrist associated to a comprehensive imaging were mandatory for a complete diagnosis and an adequate treatment. Six months after the accident, the patient made a good recovery.

Non-invasive navigation in total knee arthroplasty : a validation study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate intraope- rative alignment during total knee arthroplasty using a handheld navigation system, iAssist, in comparison with conventional optical surgical navigation. Sixty-two consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study. iAssist was used to determine implant component positioning. Orientation of the cuts were verified using a conventional optical sur- gical navigation system. We compared the iAssist system with the conventional system in terms of accuracy, percentage of outliers, bias, and precision. The occurrence of component malalignment was low. Taking standard radiography as the reference, there were no relevant differences between the handheld device and optical navigation in terms of measure- ment of accuracy or in outlier occurrence. Bias was small for both technologies, and precision was comparable. The study provides preliminary evidence that the use of iAssist leads to satisfactory implant alignment. The results from this study imply that iAssist could be a viable alternative to conventional optical navigation.

Reliability of patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

The aim of this study was to compare the precision between Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) and Conventional Instrumentation (CI) as determined intra-operatively by a pinless navigation system. Eighty patients were included in this prospective comparative study and they were divided into two homogeneous groups. We defined an original score from 6 to 30 points to evaluate the accuracy of the position of the cutting guides. This score is based on 6 objective criteria. The analysis indicated that PSI was not superior to conventional instrumentation in the overall score (p = 0.949). Moreover, no statistically significant difference was observed for any individual criteria of our score. Level of evidence II.

Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: comparative results in a preliminary series of 72 cases.

The aim of this study was to assess the value of navigation in achieving correct positioning of the implants and soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty. We compared the axis alignment achieved in 72 LCS TKA's performed with navigation assistance to a historical cohort of 62 LCS TKA's implanted with the conventional instrumentation. The position of the tibial and femoral implants and the post-operative mechanical axes of the lower limbs were compared in the two series: there was a highly significant improvement in the alignment accuracy in the navigated series (p < 0.0001). There were no outliers in the computer-assisted series whereas 47% of the cases in the conventional series showed deviations of the mechanical axis of the lower limb of more than 2 degrees from neutral alignment. However, the position of the femoral implants in rotation was not improved, suggesting that there may be a need for a more refined technique for rotational alignment of the femur, which was based essentially in the present series on ligament balance in flexion. The height of the joint line was preserved in 89% of the cases, validating the empirical use of the spreader tool prototype used during the study. Navigation eases optimal ligament balancing, by providing information that is used for appropriate release of soft tissue to achieve the proper mechanical axis. No major complication related to the use of navigation was observed. Operation time was lengthened on average by 30 minutes. Long-term studies are necessary to show whether better accuracy in ligament balancing and higher precision in restoration of mechanical axes will improve the functional results and the survival rate of knee arthroplasty.