Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 305(1): 87-93, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34561716

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study has two aims: determine the prevalence of CIN3 + in patients with discordant cotesting, defined as negative cytology and positive human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and identify factors (including HPV strain) associated with CIN3 + , defined as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or cancer within this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of women age 30-65 with intact cervices who had discordant cotesting results between January 1, 2013 and September 1, 2018, at an academic medical center. We used the t test for continuous variables and the Chi-square test for categorical variables to compare women with and without CIN3 + . To identify factors associated with CIN3 + , we performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The primary outcome was the prevalence of CIN3 + based on pathologic diagnosis following biopsy or excisional procedure. Among 375 patients with discordant co-testing, the mean age was 43.8 years, 58.4% were parous, and 84.8% were white. Overall, 43/375 (12.0%) had CIN3 + and 7/375 (1.9%) had AIS. On logistic regression, only parity ≥ 1 (p = 0.04, adjusted OR = 2.23, CI = 1.06-4.68) was significantly associated with CIN3 + . HPV-18 was less likely to be associated with CIN3 + (p = 0.02, adjusted OR 0.08, CI 0.01-0.65) but was present in 43% of AIS cases. HPV16 and other HR-HPV strains were highly associated with CIN3 + . CONCLUSION: Women with discordant cotesting are at significant risk for CIN3 + . We recommend that biopsy be performed at the time of indicated colposcopy for all patients with discordant cotesting to assess for high-grade dysplasia.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Adulto , Idoso , Colposcopia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Esfregaço Vaginal
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 23(3): 358-63, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26561374

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the complications associated with single-incision laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: A single academic institution. PATIENTS: One hundred fifteen consecutive patients undergoing single-incision laparoscopy with suspected gynecologic oncology conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Single-incision laparoscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred fifteen patients underwent single-incision laparoscopy. The mean age was 55.3 ± 13.1 years. For procedures completed via single-incision laparoscopy (102/115 [88.7%]), the mean operative time was 130.7 ± 55.5 minutes. The average blood loss was 63 ± 111 mL. The conversion to open rate was 13 of 115 (12.17%). The conversion rate of the 55 patients with benign conditions was lower (2/55 [3.64%]) compared with the 60 patients with malignant conditions (11/60 [18.33%]). The hernia rate was 2 of 115 (1.80%), 1 of which was a recurrent hernia. The median time for follow-up was 30 days (range, 5-653 days). CONCLUSION: Single-incision laparoscopy provides a feasible, safe, and promising minimally invasive modality for treating gynecologic oncology patients.


Assuntos
Hérnia Incisional/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Neoplasias Urogenitais/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Urogenitais/complicações , Adulto Jovem
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 213(3): 344.e1-7, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25981843

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify the predischarge predictors of 30-day readmission and the impact of same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing only laparoscopic hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy participated in the study. RESULTS: The 30-day readmission rate was 3.1% (277 of 8890). Factors predictive of higher rates of readmission were diabetes (4.4% vs 3.0%; P = .03), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8.5% vs 3.1%; P = .02), disseminated cancer (20% vs 3.1%; P < .001), chronic steroid use (7.1% vs 3.1%; P = .03), daily alcohol use of more than 2 drinks (12.5% vs 2.5%; P = .04), and bleeding disorder (10.8% vs 3%; P = .001). Operative factors included surgical time of 2 hours or greater (3.5% vs 2.7%; P = .014). After surgery, patients had a higher rate of readmission when they experienced any 1 or more complications prior to discharge, (6.9% vs 3.1%; P = .01) as well as any complication after discharge (3.6% vs 1.6%; P = .01). Infections (35.7%) and surgical complications (24.2%) were the most common reasons of readmissions. Of these patients, 20.9% were discharged the same day (n = 1855) and had a similar rate of readmission (2.6% vs 3.2%; P = n.s.). Laparoscopic hysterectomy readmission score (LHRS) can be calculated by assigning 1 point to diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, disseminated cancer, chronic steroid use, bleeding disorder, length of surgery of 2 hours or longer, and 2 points to any postoperative complication prior to discharge. Readmission rates for the LHRS score were score 1 (2.4%), score 2 (3.3%), score 3 (5.8%), or score 4 (9.5%). CONCLUSION: The overall readmission rate after laparoscopic hysterectomy is low. Patients discharged the same day have similar rates of readmission. Higher LHRS is indicative of higher rates of readmission and may identify a population not suitable for same-day discharge and in need of higher vigilance to prevent readmissions.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/métodos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Ovariectomia/métodos , Alta do Paciente , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Salpingectomia/métodos , Doenças Uterinas/epidemiologia , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...