Effect of application score strategy on interviews offered to postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residency applicants.

OBJECTIVES: Residency programs may need to spend a large amount of time on the application review process in order to invite the best candidates for interviews. By using a different scoring strategy, this process could be made more efficient while still resulting in selection of the most appropriate candidates to interview. The objective of this study was to explore hypothetical scoring strategies for past residency applicants and to determine the percentage of these applicants that would have received an interview offer compared with the program's standard scoring strategy. METHODS: Two years of residency applications to a postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) program providing the majority of clinical experience in ambulatory care were analyzed. Four models were explored: 1) standard model (original method); 2) simplified model (derived from statistical methods); 3) intuition model (criteria thought to best exemplify program success); and 4) objective model (criteria easy to objectively record, e.g., grade point average). All 3 new models were compared with the standard model to determine the percentage of candidates who would have received an interview if their applications had been scored according to the new model. RESULTS: A total of 110 applications were reviewed (42 interviews offered). After a multivariable analysis, academics, leadership, interest in ambulatory care, and professionalism were included in the simplified model, which predicted 81% of the interviews offered through the standard model. The intuition and objective models predicted 71% and 48% of interviews offered through the standard model, respectively. CONCLUSION: Models scoring only 4 of the initial 12 criteria would have likely predicted 71% to 81% of original interview offers. Residency programs should consider periodically reviewing their application review processes to determine areas for improved efficiency.

Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim versus fluoroquinolones for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infections.

OBJECTIVES: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia causes high mortality rates, especially in bloodstream infections (BSIs) where there is a lack of comparative data with fluoroquinolones (FQs) and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT). The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with S. maltophilia BSI who were treated with FQs versus SXT. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to compare FQs (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin) versus SXT for the treatment of S. maltophilia BSI. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included in this retrospective study, including 32 treated with SXT and 22 treated with FQs (11 ciprofloxacin, 5 levofloxacin and 6 moxifloxacin). There were 3 deaths (13.6%) in the FQ group versus 10 (31.3%) in the SXT group (P=0.20). Modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score [odds ratio (OR)=1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.8] and broad-spectrum antibiotics prior to culture (OR=8, 95% CI 1.3-49.8) were significant predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin are possible alternatives to SXT for S. maltophilia BSI; however, further investigation is needed to confirm these findings.

Use of High-Dose Oral Valacyclovir During an Intravenous Acyclovir Shortage: A Retrospective Analysis of Tolerability and Drug Shortage Management.

INTRODUCTION: In late 2011, a shortage of IV acyclovir led to the need to empirically substitute high-dose oral valacyclovir (HDVA) to conserve IV acyclovir for patients with confirmed herpes simplex virus (HSV) meningitis or encephalitis. This report describes the management of the most recent national IV acyclovir shortage by the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) at Northwestern Memorial Hospital (NMH), Chicago, IL, USA, and the use of HDVA. Secondarily, we assessed the safety and tolerability of HDVA as an alternate to IV acyclovir during this shortage. METHODS: We report the step-wise management, restrictions, and guidelines implemented at NMH during a protracted IV acyclovir shortage. The assessment of HDVA was a retrospective, observational cohort study of hospitalized patients receiving HDVA between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013. Appropriate demographic and treatment variables were collected. The primary outcome was percentage of patients experiencing an adverse event. RESULTS: There were 15 adult patients included in the study on a median daily dose of HDVA of 3 g (IQR 2-8). There were four patients with microbiologically confirmed viral CNS infections (n = 1 HSV-1, n = 2 HSV-2, n = 1 VZV encephalitis) and eleven patients with unknown causative pathogens. Six (40%) patients experienced at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR) to HDVA (thrombocytopenia, 33.3%, n = 5; headache, 6.7%, n = 1; nausea, 6.7%, n = 1; rash, 6.7%, n = 1). One patient (6.7%) was readmitted within 30 days with a suspected non-CNS infection. There were no treatment discontinuations or symptomatic therapy necessary to treat any of the ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: The shortage of IV acyclovir was successfully managed by the ASP and HDVA appeared to be well tolerated when used as an alternative to IV acyclovir.