Chemotherapy-induced ileitis associated or not with colitis in digestive oncology patients: An AGEO multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The characteristics and management of ileitis induced by chemotherapy in cancer patients are poorly described in the literature. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre study enroled patients hospitalized in a digestive oncology unit for a symptomatic chemotherapy-induced ileitis. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included, with a regimen based on fluoropyrimidine and/or irinotecan in 95% of cases. Five patients were excluded due to the diagnosis of infectious ileitis (Clostridium difficile in 3 patients, Campylobacter jejuni in 1 patient and cytomegalovirus in 1 patient). The most frequently described symptoms were diarrhoea (77% including 54% of grade 3-4 diarrhoea), abdominal pain (58%), fever (51%) and vomiting (56%). An ileo-colonoscopy was performed in 35% of patients and did not show any specific results or severity criteria. The ileitis was complicated by bowel perforation and/or obstruction in 3 patients. Disease progression was favourable in 1-2 weeks in the vast majority of cases, on symptomatic treatment, allowing resumption of the chemotherapy regimen involved in 67% of patients. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy-induced ileitis is a rare complication that most often involves fluoropyri-midine- and/or irinotecan-based regimens. In most cases, endoscopic examinations were not contributory and do not seem useful in the event of non-severe symptomatology which most often develops favourably on symptomatic therapy, allowing resumption of the chemotherapy involved.

Intentional R1 resection of liver metastases: A new treatment paradigm for patients with advanced colorectal cancer based on a propensity score-Matched case-control analysis.

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after an incomplete microscopic (R1) resection of liver metastases may not differ from those following a microscopically margin negative (R0) resection, when the latest is not feasible because of anatomic issues. We aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of CRC patients with an intentional R1 or with a R0 resection of liver metastases. METHODS: All patients with advanced in CRC and liver metastases consecutively treated by liver resection between February 2005 and January 2019 at in the department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery of Henri Mondor University Hospital (Créteil, France) were included in this retrospective case-control study. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were compared between patients who underwent an intentional (pre-operative decision) R1 resection (iR1) to those who had a R0 resection of liver metastases. To account for confounding, comparison between the 2 groups was performed after adjustment using propensity score analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-six CRC patients treated by iR1 resection of liver metastases were compared to 98 patients treated by R0 resection. Median OS reached 39 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 25-67] and 63 months [95% CI: 52-76] in the iR1 and R0 groups, respectively. After adjustment by inverse probability of treatment weighting, patients' OS and EFS did not differ significantly between the iR1 and R0 groups (hazard ratio (HR): 1.19 [0.54-2.62] and 1.67 [0.93-3.03]), respectively. CONCLUSION: iR1 resection of liver metastases in advanced CRC patients is an acceptable therapeutic strategy, when R0 resection is not feasible.