Association of Central Auditory Processing Dysfunction With Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether central auditory processing dysfunction measured by the dichotic digit test-1 digit (DDT1) is present in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) individuals who are cognitively normal (CN) older adults with the cerebral beta-amyloid (Aß) deposition and to explore the potential of the DDT1 as a screening test for preclinical AD. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: A prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: CN older adults with a global clinical dementia rating score of 0 were included. The hearing test battery including pure-tone audiometry, speech audiometry, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and DDT1 was administered to participants. RESULTS: Fifty CN older adults were included. Among them, 38 individuals were included in the Aß deposition negative (AN) group and 12 were included in the Aß deposition positive (AP) group. The DDT1 scores of both the better and worse ears were significantly lower in the AP group than in the AN group (p = .008 and p = .015, respectively). No significant differences were observed between the groups in tests of the peripheral auditory pathways. In multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for apolipoprotein E4 positivity, the DDT1 better ear score predicted the AP group (p = .036, odds ratio = 0.892, 95% confidence interval: 0.780-0.985) with relatively high diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that Aß deposition may affect the central auditory pathway even before cognitive decline appears. DDT1, which can easily be applied to the old-age population, may have the potential as a screening tool for preclinical AD.

Electrical dynamic range is only weakly associated with auditory performance and speech recognition in long-term users of cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE: The electrical dynamic range (EDR) has been suggested to be related to auditory performance in cochlear implant (CI) users. However, few reports have evaluated postlingual CI users who have used CIs for long periods in comparison with prelingual CI users. Here, we evaluated auditory perception and speech performance in terms of the EDR in long-term CI users. The EDR, and auditory and speech performances, were compared between pre- and post-lingual CI users. METHODS: We enrolled all patients who received CIs from April 2000 to December 2010 at Seoul National University Hospital, and who had ≥5 years of experience with CIs. The EDRs affording subjective responses at the threshold level (T-level) and comfortable level (C-level) were analyzed in terms of their relationships with pure tone audiometry levels, speech evaluation scores, including those on the Phonetically Balanced (PB) Word List test, vowel and consonant tests, a sentence test, and the Korean version of the Central Institute for the Deaf (K-CID) test; we also calculated Category in Auditory Performance (CAP) scores. RESULTS: We found no significant difference in the average EDR, CAP, K-CID, PB word, consonant, or vowel scores between pre- and post-lingual CI users. The EDR was weakly associated with the PB word (P = 0.003, r = 0.462) and consonant scores (P = 0.005, r = 0.438). Other speech evaluations, such as the CAP, K-CID, and vowel scores, were not significantly associated with the EDR T-level. We found no association between pure tone thresholds at 0.5, 1, or 2 kHz, and the speech evaluation scores or EDRs of low-, middle-, or high-frequency channels. CONCLUSIONS: The EDR was only weakly associated with speech performance, such as scores on consonant and PB word tests in long-term CI users, irrespective of pre- or post-lingual deafness status.