Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transplantation ; 105(3): 577-585, 2021 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32265418

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prestorage leukoreduction has the advantage over poststorage leukoreduction in reducing leukocyte-derived molecules in red blood cells (RBC) unit, which induce immunomodulation. Our institution newly introduced prestorage leukoreduction, instead of conventional poststorage leukoreduction, for liver transplant recipients since March 2012. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the risk of posttransplant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after the conversion of poststorage leukoreduction into prestorage leukoreduction for transfused allogeneic RBCs. METHODS: Among 220 patients who underwent living-donor liver transplantation for HCC, 83 of 113 who received only poststorage-leukoreduced RBCs were matched with 83 of 107 who received only prestorage-leukoreduced RBCs using 1:1 propensity score matching based on factors like tumor biology. The primary outcome was overall HCC recurrence. Survival analysis was performed with death as a competing risk event. RESULTS: In the matched cohort, recurrence probability at 1, 2, and 5 years posttransplant was 9.6%, 15.6%, and 18.1% in prestorage group and 15.6%, 21.6%, and 33.7% in poststorage group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 0.28-0.97; P = 0.040). Multivariable analysis confirmed a significance of prestorage leukoreduction (HR, 0.29; 0.15-0.59; P < 0.001). Overall death risk was also lower with prestorage leukoreduction (HR, 0.51; 0.26-0.99; P = 0.049). In subgroup analysis for the unmatched cohort, recurrence risk was significantly lower in prestorage group within the patients who underwent surgery 2 years (HR, 0.24; 0.10-0.61; P = 0.002), 1 year (HR, 0.16; 0.03-0.92; P = 0.040), and 6 months (HR, 0.13; 0.02-0.85; P = 0.034), respectively, before and after the conversion to prestorage leukoreduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a potential benefit of prestorage leukoreduction in reducing the risk of HCC recurrence in liver transplant recipients who received allogeneic RBCs during the perioperative period.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiologia , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Doadores Vivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 96(18): e6801, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28471979

RESUMO

We retrospectively evaluated the effects of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 on postoperative blood loss and acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB).Electronic medical records of 771 patients who underwent OPCAB in our hospital between July 2012 and July 2014 were reviewed, and 249 patients without intraoperative HES-exposure (group NoHES) were matched 1:N with intraoperative HES-exposed 413 patients (group HES) based on propensity score. The effects of intraoperative HES on postoperative cumulative blood loss within the first 24 hours, need for bleeding-related reoperation, and occurrence of postoperative AKI (determined by KDIGO and RIFLE criteria) were analyzed.In our propensity score matched cohort, there were no significant differences between groups for median postoperative 24 hours blood loss (525 mL in group HES vs. 540 mL in group NoHES, P = .203) or need for bleeding-related reoperation (OR, 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-9.34, P = .19). However, postoperative AKI (assessed by 2 criteria) occurred more frequently in group HES than in group NoHES (by KDIGO criteria: 10.7% vs. 3.6%; OR 3.43 [95% CI, 1.67-7.04]; P < .001 and by RIFLE criteria: 9.6% vs. 2%; OR 3.32 [95% CI, 1.34-8.24]; P = .01). The median volume of infused HES per patient weight was 16 mL/kg in group HES.In the patients undergoing OPCAB, intraoperative 6% HES 130/0.4 did not increase postoperative bleeding. However, renal safety remains a concern. Intraoperative use of HES should be determined cautiously during OPCAB.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária sem Circulação Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/administração & dosagem , Substitutos do Plasma/administração & dosagem , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Substitutos do Plasma/efeitos adversos , Pontuação de Propensão , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 154(1): 360-366, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28412111

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Hypoxemia is common during one-lung ventilation (OLV) for thoracic surgery. When hypoxemia occurs, surgery is interrupted for rescue ventilation. Apneic oxygen insufflation (AOI), which provides O2 without applying pressure, may prevent hypoxemia and does not interrupt surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the AOI technique for preventing hypoxemia during OLV in thoracic surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing open or thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy from September to December 2015 were included. Patients were assigned randomly to a non-AOI group or an AOI group (n = 45 each). OLV was initiated and at the 15-minute mark (OLV15), patients in the AOI group received oxygen insufflation at 3 L/min to the nonventilated lung for 30 minutes (OLV45). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of hypoxemia (SaO2 <90%) during OLV. RESULTS: The demographic and operative data were similar between the 2 groups. The incidence of hypoxemia was greater in the non-AOI than the AOI group (18% vs 0%; P = .009). ΔPaO2 (the difference in partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood between OLV 45 and 15 minutes) was smaller in the AOI than the non-AOI group (-29 mm Hg vs -69 mm Hg; P = .005). Duration of surgery and incidence of complications did not vary between groups. CONCLUSIONS: AOI decreases the incidence of hypoxemia and improves arterial oxygenation during OLV for open and thoracoscopic surgery. AOI may be a valuable option to prevent hypoxemia. It can be used before relying on continuous positive airway pressure or intermittent two-lung ventilation and result in fewer interruptions in surgery.


Assuntos
Hipóxia/etiologia , Hipóxia/prevenção & controle , Insuflação , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Ventilação Monopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Oxigênio/administração & dosagem , Pneumonectomia/métodos , Toracoscopia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Hipóxia/epidemiologia , Incidência , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...