Predictive factors of therapeutic intervention in on-call endoscopy for suspected gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Performing an endoscopy out of hours confer significant burdens on limited health-care resources. However, not all on-call endoscopies lead to therapeutic interventions. The purpose of the present study was to analyze predictive factors for performing therapeutic intervention in patients with suspected gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: We reviewed and analyzed electronic medical records regarding on-call endoscopy that were prospectively collected for quality control. The subjects were patients with suspected gastrointestinal bleeding who underwent on-call endoscopies at night, on weekends and on holidays between April 2013 and January 2017 in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. To determine predictive factors for performing therapeutic intervention, the following variables were analyzed: symptoms, patient status, coexisting disease, laboratory findings and medications. To clarify the association between the likelihood of therapeutic intervention in on-call endoscopy and AIMS65 score, the included variables were divided by cutoffs. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients (male: 72.6%, mean age: 62.6 years) with suspected gastrointestinal bleeding had on-call endoscopies and 153 (56.7%) patients had therapeutic intervention. Gastroscopy, colonoscopy and both endoscopic techniques were performed in 215, 42 and 13 patients, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, hematemesis (p < .001, odds ratio [OR], 2.484) and prolonged prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) (p = .033; OR, 1.958) were correlated with performing therapeutic intervention in on-call endoscopy. AIMS65 score with a cutoff of 2 was associated with the likelihood of intervention (p = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Hematemesis and prolonged PT-INR were predictive factors of therapeutic intervention when on-call endoscopy was performed in patients with suspected gastrointestinal bleeding.

Effects of N-acetylcysteine on First-Line Sequential Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the adjuvant effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on first-line sequential therapy (SQT) for Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: Patients with H. pylori infections were randomly assigned to receive sequential therapy with (SQT+NAC group, n=49) or without (SQT-only group, n=50) NAC. Sequential therapy consisted of rabeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for the first 5 days, followed by rabeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and metronidazole 500 mg for the remaining 5 days; all drugs were administered twice daily. For the SQT+NAC group, NAC 400 mg bid was added for the first 5 days of sequential therapy. H. pylori eradication was evaluated 4 weeks after the completion of therapy. RESULTS: The eradication rates by intention-to-treat analysis were 58.0% in the SQT-only group and 67.3% in the SQT+NAC group (p=0.336). The eradication rates by per-protocol analysis were 70.0% in the SQT-only group and 80.5% in the SQT+NAC group (p=0.274). Compliance was very good in both groups (SQT only/SQT+NAC groups: 95.2%/100%, p=0.494). There was no significant difference in the adverse event rates between groups (SQT-only/SQT+NAC groups: 26.2%/26.8%, p=0.947). CONCLUSIONS: The H. pylorieradication rate was numerically higher in the SQT+NAC group than in the SQT-only group. As our data did not reach statistical significance, larger trials are warranted.

Optimal initiation of Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

AIM: To evaluate when Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy (ET) should be started in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). METHODS: Clinical data concerning adults hospitalized with PUB were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Age, sex, type and stage of peptic ulcer, whether endoscopic therapy was performed or not, methods of H. pylori detection, duration of hospitalization, and specialty of the attending physician were investigated. Factors influencing the confirmation of H. pylori infection prior to discharge were determined using multiple logistic regression analysis. The H. pylori eradication rates of patients who received ET during hospitalization and those who commenced ET as outpatients were compared. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients with PUB were evaluated for H. pylori infection by histology and/or rapid urease testing. Of these patients, 53.7% (127/232) had confirmed results of H. pylori infection prior to discharge. In multivariate analysis, duration of hospitalization and ulcer stage were factors independently influencing whether H. pylori infection was confirmed before or after discharge. Among the patients discharged before confirmation of H. pylori infection, 13.3% (14/105) were lost to follow-up. Among the patients found to be H. pylori-positive after discharge, 41.4% (12/29) did not receive ET. There was no significant difference in the H. pylori eradication rate between patients who received ET during hospitalization and those who commenced ET as outpatients [intention-to-treat: 68.8% (53/77) vs 60% (12/20), P=0.594; per-protocol: 82.8% (53/64) vs 80% (12/15), P=0.723]. CONCLUSION: Because many patients with PUB who were discharged before H. pylori infection status was confirmed lost an opportunity to receive ET, we should confirm H. pylori infection and start ET prior to discharge.