Knowledge of radiation exposure associated with common trauma imaging modalities among orthopaedic surgeons, emergency medicine physicians, and general surgeons in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Few contemporary studies have assessed physicians' knowledge of radiation exposure associated with common imaging studies, especially in trauma care. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge of physicians involved in caring for trauma patients regarding the effective radiation doses of musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging studies routinely utilized in the trauma setting. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to United States orthopaedic surgery, general surgery, and emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. Participants were asked to estimate the radiation dose for common imaging modalities of the pelvis, lumbar spine, and lower extremity, in terms of chest X-ray (CXR) equivalents. Physician estimates were compared to the true effective radiation doses. Additionally, participants were asked to report the frequency of discussing radiation risk with patients. RESULTS: A total of 218 physicians completed the survey; 102 (46.8%) were EM physicians, 88 (40.4%) were orthopaedic surgeons, and 28 (12.8%) were general surgeons. Physicians underestimated the effective radiation doses of nearly all imaging modalities, most notably for pelvic computed tomaography (CT) (median 50 CXR estimation vs. 162 CXR actual) and lumbar CT (median 50 CXR estimation vs. 638 CXR actual). There was no difference between physician specialties regarding estimation accuracy (P=0.133). Physicians who regularly discussed radiation risks with patients more accurately estimated radiation exposure (P=0.007). CONCLUSION: The knowledge among orthopaedic and general surgeons and EM physicians regarding the radiation exposure associated with common MSK trauma imaging is lacking. Further investigation with larger scale studies is warranted, and additional education in this area may improve care.

Backout of Distal Interlocking Screws After Retrograde Femoral Nailing With a Novel Device: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: To report upon a series of patients who have experienced the backout of distal interlocking screws after retrograde femoral nailing with the DePuy Synthes RFN-Advanced Retrograde Femoral Nailing System (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENTS: Twenty-seven skeletally mature patients with femoral shaft or distal femur fractures who underwent operative fixation with the DePuy Synthes RFN-Advanced Retrograde Femoral Nailing System with 8 patients subsequently experiencing backout of distal interlocking screws. INTERVENTION: The study intervention included retrospective review of patient charts and radiographs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The incidence rate of distal interlocking screw backout. RESULTS: Thirty percent of patients experienced the backout of at least 1 distal interlocking screw (mean: 1.625) after undergoing retrograde femoral nailing with the RFN-Advanced system. Thirteen total screws backed out postoperatively. Screw backout was identified an average of 61 days postoperatively (range: 30-139 days). All patients complained of implant prominence and pain along the medial or lateral aspect of the knee. Five patients elected to return to the operating room to remove the symptomatic implant. The oblique distal interlocking screws comprised 62% of screw backouts. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high incidence rate of this complication, the associated costs of reoperation, and patient discomfort, we believe that a further investigation into this implant complication is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Accuracy of self-reported opioid use in orthopaedic trauma patients.

PURPOSE: Opioids have long been a mainstay of treatment for pain in patients with orthopaedic injuries, but little is known about the accuracy of self-reported narcotic usage in orthopaedic trauma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported opioid usage in orthopaedic trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of all new patients presenting to the orthopaedic trauma clinic of a level 1 trauma centre with a chief complaint of recent orthopaedic-related injury over a 2-year time frame was conducted. Participants were administered a survey inquiring about narcotic usage within the prior 3 months. Responses were cross-referenced against a query of a statewide prescription drug monitoring program system. RESULTS: The study comprised 241 participants; 206 (85.5%) were accurate reporters, while 35 (14.5%) were inaccurate reporters. Significantly increased accuracy was associated with hospital admission prior to clinic visit (ß = - 1.33; χ2 = 10.68, P < 0.01; OR: 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.62). Decreased accuracy was associated with higher pre-visit total morphine equivalent dose (MED) (ß = 0.002; χ2 = 11.30, P < 0.01), with accurate reporters having significantly lower pre-index visit MED levels compared to underreporters (89.2 ± 208.7 mg vs. 249.6 ± 509.3 mg; P = 0.04). An Emergency Department (ED) visit prior to the index visit significantly predicted underreporting (ß = 0.424; χ2 = 4.28, P = 0.04; OR: 2.34, 95% CI 1.01-5.38). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that most new patients presenting to an orthopaedic trauma clinic with acute injury will accurately report their narcotic usage within the preceding 3 months. Prior hospital admissions increased the likelihood of accurate reporting while higher MEDs or an ED visit prior to the initial visit increased the likelihood of underreporting.

Variability of orthopedic physician fracture location identification: Implications for bone stimulator treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Aseptic non-union is a significant complication in approximately 5% of long-bone fractures. External bone stimulation treatment is often attempted before more invasive surgical interventions. Bone stimulators can have favorable results, but have a limited 1.7cm therapeutic radius. This study evaluated the accuracy by which clinicians locate a fracture on a cadaveric model. This has implications for the clinician's ability to accurately counsel patients on daily bone stimulator placement. Additionally, physicians (orthopedic attending surgeons and residents) were compared with pre-clinical (M1 and M2) medical students to evaluate if higher levels of training improved accuracy. HYPOTHESIS: Orthopedic physicians and pre-clinical medical students will localize a radiographic fracture within 1.7cm less than 100% of the time, which represents the ideal consistency for patient care. Furthermore, orthopedic physicians will achieve a higher percentage accuracy than pre-clinical medical students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample included 20 orthopedic physicians and 16 pre-clinical medical students. Upper (radius) and lower (tibia) extremity cadaver models were prepared by inducing a single, transverse diaphyseal fracture. Plain reference radiographs of each model were obtained. Participants placed a radiopaque marker onto each model at the perceived fracture location, and radiographs were taken to document placement. Perpendicular marker-to-fracture distance was measured to the nearest mm along each bone's long axis using the PACS system. RESULTS: Placement within the therapeutic radius was achieved by 70-80% of physicians, and 69-75% of medical students. In the remaining participants, improper placement distances were lower among physicians than among medical students (radius: 2.1±0.5 vs. 3.6±0.9cm, p=0.02; tibia: 2.6±0.5 vs 3.5±0.5cm, p=0.89). DISCUSSION: In two cadaveric fracture models, up to 30% of orthopedic surgeons perceived a fracture location to be outside a bone stimulator's 1.7cm therapeutic radius. This finding suggests that physicians and their patients may benefit from additional methods for specifying the location of a non-union before commencing daily bone stimulator treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prospective cohort study-evidence from a well-designed prospective cohort study.