Serological Responses to the First Three Doses of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study

BackgroundIndividuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are immunocompromised may have a reduced serological response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We investigated serological responses following 1st, 2nd, and 3rd doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in those with IBD. MethodsA prospective cohort study of persons with IBD (n = 496) assessed serological response 1-8 weeks after 1st dose vaccination, 1-8 weeks after 2nd dose, 8 or more weeks after 2nd dose, and at least 1 week after 3rd dose. Seroconversion and geometric mean titer (GMT) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were assessed for antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Multivariable linear regression models assessed the adjusted fold change (FC) in antibody levels. ResultsSeroconversion and GMT increased from post-1st dose to 1-8 weeks post-2nd dose (81.6%, 1814 AU/mL vs. 98.7%, 9229 AU/mL, p<0.001), decreased after 8 weeks post-2nd dose (94.9%, 3002 AU/mL, p<0.001), and rebounded post-3rd dose (99.6%, 14639 AU/mL, p<0.001). Prednisone was the only IBD-related medication associated with diminished antibody response after 3rd-dose vaccination (FC: 0.07 [95% CI: 0.02, 0.20]). Antibody levels steadily decline following the 2nd (FC: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.90, 0.94] per week) and 3rd dose (FC: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.84, 0.92] per week) of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. ConclusionA three-dose regimen of vaccination to SARS-CoV-2 yields a robust antibody response for those with IBD across all classes of IBD therapies except for prednisone. The decaying antibody levels following the 3rd dose of the vaccine should be monitored in future studies.

Changes in ischemic stroke presentations and associated workflow during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A population study in Alberta, Canada

BackgroundPandemics may promote hospital avoidance among patients with emergencies, and added precautions may exacerbate treatment delays. There is a paucity of population-based data on these phenomena for stroke. We examined the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation and treatment of ischemic stroke in an entire population. MethodsWe used linked provincial administrative data and data from the Quality Improvement and Clinical Research Alberta Stroke Program - a registry capturing stroke-related data on the entire population of Alberta(4.3 million)- to identify all patients presenting with stroke in the pre-pandemic(1-January-2016 to 27-February-2020, n=19,531) and pandemic(28-February-2020 to 30-August-2020, n=2,255) periods. We examined changes in thrombolysis and endovascular therapy(EVT) rates, workflow, and in-hospital outcomes. ResultsHospitalizations/presentations for ischemic stroke dropped (weekly adjusted-incidence-rate-ratio[aIRR]:0.48, 95%CI:0.46-0.50, adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, pre-admission care needs), as did population-level incidence of thrombolysis(aIRR:0.49,0.44-0.56) or EVT(aIRR:0.59,0.49-0.69). However, the proportions of presenting patients receiving acute therapies did not decline (e.g. thrombolysis:11.7% pre-pandemic vs 13.1% during-pandemic, aOR:1.02,0.75-1.38). Onset-to-door times were prolonged; EVT recipients experienced longer door-to-reperfusion times (median door-to-reperfusion:110-minutes, IQR:77-156 pre-pandemic vs 132.5-minutes, 99-179 during-pandemic; adjusted-coefficient:18.7-minutes, 95%CI:1.45-36.0). Hospitalizations were shorter but stroke severity and in-hospital mortality did not differ. InterpretationThe first COVID-19 wave was associated with a halving of presentations and acute therapy utilization for ischemic stroke at a population level, and greater pre-hospital and in-hospital treatment delays. Our data can inform public health messaging and stroke care in current and future waves. Messaging should encourage attendance for emergencies and stroke systems should re-examine "code stroke" protocols to mitigate inefficiencies.